Comparison of the prognostic value of F-18 FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters of primary tumors and MRI findings in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of metabolic parameters of pretreatment primary tumor and regional lymph nodes with F-18-FDG PET/CT compared with MRI findings for the prognostic value and disease-free survival (DFS) in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Results of Surgery in General Surgical Patients Receiving Warfarin: Retrospective Analysis of 61 Patients

The aim of this study is to investigate postoperative complications, mortality rates, and to determine the factors affecting mortality on the patients receiving warfarin therapy preoperatively, as well as comparing the results obtained from emergency and elective surgeries. Surgical outcomes of 61 patients on long-term oral anticoagulation with warfarin who underwent surgery in our center were retrospectively reviewed over an 8-year period. Thirty-three (54.1%) patients were female, with a mean age of 53 years. Mitral valve replacement (62.3%) was the most frequent indication for chronic anticoagulation therapy. Twelve out of 61 (19.2%) patients underwent emergency surgery; 59 (96.7%) operations were classified as major surgery. We did not observe any thromboembolic events on patients receiving our bridging therapy protocol. Cardiopulmonary dysfunction (CPD; 19.7%) and hemorrhage (16.4%) were the most encountered postoperative complications. Presence of CPD, bleeding, endocarditis, and mortality were statistically significant for emergency surgeries when compared with the results obtained from elective surgeries. There were 5 (8.2%) deaths observed during follow-up. It was found that advanced age, prolonged duration of operations, and presence of CPD had a statistically significant effect on mortality (P < 0.05). The patients receiving oral anticoagulant had high postoperative complication and mortality rates. This case was more evident in emergency surgeries. It is recommendable that as mortality is more apparent in the patients who undergo emergency surgeries—being older, having long duration of operations as well as CPD. Therefore during the postoperative follow-up process, the patients should be closely monitored.Key words: Emergency, Postoperative complications, Morbidity, Mortality, WarfarinThromboembolism is a major global health concern contributing to more than 0.5 million deaths in Europe and up to 300,000 deaths in the United States each year.¹ Versatile arrays of anticoagulant and/or anti-aggregant agents are available. They are used to treat and prevent thrombosis occurring as a result of venous stasis, valvular heart disease, prosthetic valves, atrial fibrillation, or myocardial infarction. After using these medications, patients who require elective or emergency surgery represent a specific population; moreover, they are prone to developing either excessive bleeding or thrombosis.The annual incidence of major bleeding as a result of oral anticoagulant (OAC) use is reported between 2 and 5%.² Patients on OAC may require elective or sometimes emergency surgical or invasive procedures. There is no consensus on standard protocol to follow for those who require perioperative management.³In the current literature, there are limited numbers of studies regarding the discussions about the operations in general surgery patient population receiving warfarin treatments. In this retrospective study, our aim was to document the complications and outcomes of general surgical procedures implemented on patients receiving warfarin. Along with the comparison of the emergency and elective surgeries performed, we also aimed to determine the factors affecting mortality.     

The Impact of Method on Kidney Graft and Patient Survival in Kidney-Pancreas Transplantations for Type I Diabetes Mellitus

Patients who develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with Type I Diabetes Mellitus may receive kidney alone (KA) transplantation, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation, or a pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation. The goal of this study is to examine the long-term impact of pancreas transplantation on kidney graft and patient survival rates. A total of 85 transplantation cases, consisting of 30 that received living donor KA, 21 that received SPK, and 34 that received PAK, from 2003–2010 at Akdeniz University Organ Transplantation Institute were retrospectively screened. There was a graft loss in 4 cases from the KA group, and in 1 case from each of the SPK and PAK groups. The five-year kidney graft survival rates were 86.7% in KA, 95.2% in SPK, and 97.1% in PAK. There was a single patient loss in both KA and SPK. The kidney survival percentages were higher in SPK and PAK groups compared to the KA group. Therefore, SPK should be the primary preference in these patients; however, for the cases that have a living donor, pancreas transplantation should be considered after kidney transplantation, or the patients can be followed-up on with close blood sugar control.Key words: Kidney, Pancreas, Transplantation, Kidney survival, Patient survivalThe discovery of insulin in 1921 enabled the transition from diabetic ketoacidosis and diabetic coma to an increasing number of patients with prolonged life expectancies in the clinical course of diabetes mellitus (DM). However, with prolonged lifetime, increases in the neurological, ocular, and renal complications of DM have become evident. With a 40% rate, DM is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States.¹ In patients with type I DM-related kidney failure, kidney transplant is highly more preferable in terms of the negative effects of long-term dialysis on the patient survival and quality of life compared with the benefits of kidney transplants.² In patients who develop type I DM-related kidney failure, kidney-alone transplantation (KA) from a living donor or a cadaver, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK), or pancreas-after-kidney transplantation (PAK) are among the transplantation alternatives. The 10-year life expectancy in patients receiving hemodialysis for ESRD, and in those undergoing living donor or a cadaveric renal transplantation, was reported to be 4.4, 32.9, and 59.3% in the United States, respectively.³ Similarly, while the average life expectancy for diabetes patients waiting for kidney transplantation was 8 years, the average life expectancy after kidney transplantation was determined to be 22 years.² When pancreas transplantation is added to kidney transplantation, prolonged kidney and patient survival rates can be attained along with other benefits, such as protection from the secondary effects of diabetes and an increase in patients'' quality of life. While the 4-year mortality rate in the selected dialysis patients on the waitlist for pancreas-kidney was 40%, it was 10% in patients who received SPK transplantation.⁴ The goal of this study is to compare the impact of the KA, SPK, and PAK transplantation methods on kidney graft and patient survival rates in patients with ESRD associated with type I diabetes.     

Effectiveness of tenoxicam and ibuprofen for pain prevention following endodontic therapy in comparison to placebo: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

Tenoxicam is an effective analgesic and anti-inflammatory agent for symptomatic treatment of various conditions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinically the effectiveness of prophylactic tenoxicam and prophylactic ibuprofen in reducing post-endodontic pain compared with placebo. A total of 48 patients consented to a double-blind, single dose, prophylactic oral administration of 20 mg of tenoxicam, 200 mg of ibuprofen, or a placebo before root canal treatment. The root canal treatment was performed in one visit. The patients registered their degree of discomfort on a 100-mm visual analog scale, immediately postoperative, and 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after initiation of root canal treatment. The two-way ANOVA test and Tukey HSD post hoc test showed that in the 6-h period, both 20 mg of tenoxicam and 200 mg of ibuprofen provided significantly better pain relief than the placebo. Prophylactic administration of a single dose of 20 mg tenoxicam or 200 mg ibuprofen before RCT provides an effective reduction at 6 h (P < 0.05). Because of the advantages of tenoxicam, it may be useful as a prophylactic analgesic when post-endodontic pain is anticipated.