Esophageal Calibration with Soft Orogasrtric Tube During Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication may Reduce Postoperative Transient Dysphagia

Gastroesophageal reflux is the most common benign disorder of the esophagus and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has become the standard surgical treatment for its treatment. In our area, where the use of bougie calibration is debatable, postoperative dysphagia is encountered often after this surgery although it is usually not permanent. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using a soft silicone tube 39 F in diameter for esophageal calibration during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication on the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. We divided cases scheduled to undergo laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication between January 2009 and November 2010 into two groups, each consisting 25 patients. Esophageal calibration with a 39 F silicone orogastric tube was used for the first group while there was no operative calibration in the second group. The surgical duration was recorded; the presence and severity of the postoperative dysphagia was calculated by using a dysphagia severity scoring system during the 1-year postoperative follow-up. The dysphagia severity scores were significantly lower in group 1 than group 2 on the postoperative second day and at the end of the first week and first month. We did not find a significant difference at the end of the 6-month and first year. There was also no significant difference regarding surgery duration. The use of a soft orogastric tube 39 F in diameter for esophagus calibration during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative transient dysphagia without affecting the duration of surgery. Although dysphagia gradually resolves in the majority of patients, a safe and easy calibration method for its prevention is worth developing, and we believe that the use of our method in larger series could be beneficial.     

Results of Surgery in General Surgical Patients Receiving Warfarin: Retrospective Analysis of 61 Patients

The aim of this study is to investigate postoperative complications, mortality rates, and to determine the factors affecting mortality on the patients receiving warfarin therapy preoperatively, as well as comparing the results obtained from emergency and elective surgeries. Surgical outcomes of 61 patients on long-term oral anticoagulation with warfarin who underwent surgery in our center were retrospectively reviewed over an 8-year period. Thirty-three (54.1%) patients were female, with a mean age of 53 years. Mitral valve replacement (62.3%) was the most frequent indication for chronic anticoagulation therapy. Twelve out of 61 (19.2%) patients underwent emergency surgery; 59 (96.7%) operations were classified as major surgery. We did not observe any thromboembolic events on patients receiving our bridging therapy protocol. Cardiopulmonary dysfunction (CPD; 19.7%) and hemorrhage (16.4%) were the most encountered postoperative complications. Presence of CPD, bleeding, endocarditis, and mortality were statistically significant for emergency surgeries when compared with the results obtained from elective surgeries. There were 5 (8.2%) deaths observed during follow-up. It was found that advanced age, prolonged duration of operations, and presence of CPD had a statistically significant effect on mortality (P < 0.05). The patients receiving oral anticoagulant had high postoperative complication and mortality rates. This case was more evident in emergency surgeries. It is recommendable that as mortality is more apparent in the patients who undergo emergency surgeries—being older, having long duration of operations as well as CPD. Therefore during the postoperative follow-up process, the patients should be closely monitored.Key words: Emergency, Postoperative complications, Morbidity, Mortality, WarfarinThromboembolism is a major global health concern contributing to more than 0.5 million deaths in Europe and up to 300,000 deaths in the United States each year.¹ Versatile arrays of anticoagulant and/or anti-aggregant agents are available. They are used to treat and prevent thrombosis occurring as a result of venous stasis, valvular heart disease, prosthetic valves, atrial fibrillation, or myocardial infarction. After using these medications, patients who require elective or emergency surgery represent a specific population; moreover, they are prone to developing either excessive bleeding or thrombosis.The annual incidence of major bleeding as a result of oral anticoagulant (OAC) use is reported between 2 and 5%.² Patients on OAC may require elective or sometimes emergency surgical or invasive procedures. There is no consensus on standard protocol to follow for those who require perioperative management.³In the current literature, there are limited numbers of studies regarding the discussions about the operations in general surgery patient population receiving warfarin treatments. In this retrospective study, our aim was to document the complications and outcomes of general surgical procedures implemented on patients receiving warfarin. Along with the comparison of the emergency and elective surgeries performed, we also aimed to determine the factors affecting mortality.     

Hypothenar island flap: A safe and excellent choice for little finger defects

Soft-tissue defects of the little finger are challenging especially when bone, tendon or vascular pedicle is exposed because of trauma. The hypothenar island flap is easy to harvest and has a good colour and texture match to the little finger pulp. We present nine clinical cases of soft tissue defects of the little finger covered using the reversed hypothenar fasciocutaneous island flap. This article intends to highlight the ease of elevation and good clinical results of the hypothenar flap which is rarely used.KEY WORDS: Hypothenar island flap, island flap, soft-tissue defects of the little finger     

Long-term results of the application of solvent-dehydrated bone xenograft and duramater xenograft for the healing of oroantral osseous defects: a pilot experimental study

Abstract –  The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of the use of human cadaveric solvent-dehydrated bone graft and duramater as a barrier membrane for the treatment of oroantral communication. Standard oroantral osseous defects were created in five minipigs. Subjects received cancellous bone graft in the form of block or microchips, duramater or a combination of bone and membrane. Uneventful healing was achieved in all of the subjects, clinically including the control site which did not receive any material. The operated bone segments were evaluated both by radiological and histological examinations after 6 months. Radiological evaluation was carried out using bone density analysis software and histological evaluation made by light microscopy. Radiological and histological results revealed that bone grafting of oroantral osseous defects improved the bone quality. However, application of duramater did not change this activity, both alone or combined with bone grafts. Within the limits of this experimental study, although solvent-dehydrated bone grafts were found superior and could be applied for the healing of osseous oroantral defects, resorbable membranes did not contribute to this process.     

The effectiveness of analgesics in traumatic injuries of the extremities

In this study, the effectiveness of different analgesics was investigated in patients who presented to the emergency room with traumatic injuries or fractures of the extremities. We observed 100 patients (42 male, 58 female) who presented to the Konya State Hospital emergency service with isolated traumatic injuries of the extremities. We used different analgesics intravenously or intramuscularly in those patients with a high or moderate level of pain according to a visual analog pain scale. Patient pain levels were assessed 15, 30, and 45 minutes after administration of the analgesics. Metamizole sodium 1 g IV was used in 36 patients and diclofenac sodium 75 mg IM was given to 40 patients; tramadol hydrochloride 100 mg IV was administered to 24 patients. Pain became less severe after 15 minutes in 92% of patients who received tramadol IV; pain became less severe after 30 minutes in 72% of those who received metamizole IV. In contrast, pain became less severe after 45 minutes in 65% of patients who received diclofenac IM. Tramadol was the most effective analgesic and was also more effective earlier than the other analgesics tested.     

The status of alternative treatment in cancer patients in Turkey

This study was designed to measure the frequency at which Turkish patients with cancer resort to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). A total of 704 patients referred to the Gülhane Military Medical Academy and Ankara Numune Training Hospital between September 2002 and January 2003 were asked about the CAM therapies they used. Of these, 276 patients (39.2%) had used CAM. Gender, marital status, educational status, age, financial status, severity of pain, history of cancer in the family, and their own ideas concerning CAM therapies were found to be correlated with the frequency of resorting to CAM. Resorting to CAM may lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment, adverse drug interactions, treatment withdrawal, and disease progression. Therefore, it is very important to inform patients about these potential dangers. Further studies are needed to clarify the reasons that lead patients to resort to CAM.