Needs and needs assessment: their components and definitions with reference to dementia

The concept of need and the practice of needs assessment are both subject to a wide range of interpretations, to the likely detriment of individual assessments and to multidisciplinary working. Clear definition is important for individual assessment, for the development of multidisciplinary tools and in gathering planning information. The concept of need is clarified, firstly by distinguishing between need and the difficulties that engender it, and secondly through a taxonomy of need. These assist clear definitions of both need and needs assessment when linked with a consideration of the current help a person receives and a specification of the type of help required by a person to meet their needs. Such definitions have implications for the role of needs assessment in individual assessment, service evaluation, service management and planning and in the development of multidisciplinary needs assessment tools.     

What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study

OBJECTIVE: To obtain consensus on the principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. DESIGN: Consensus methods were used. An expert workshop, employing the nominal group technique was used to generate potential principles and indicators. A two-round postal Delphi process was used to obtain consensus on the principles and indicators. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were drawn from health, social care, universities and consumer organizations. A purposive sampling strategy was used to identify people who had experience and/or knowledge of consumer involvement in NHS research. Six researchers and seven consumers participated in an expert workshop. Ninety-six people completed both rounds of the Delphi process. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consensus on principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. RESULTS: Eight principles were developed through an expert workshop and Delphi process, and rated as both clear and valid. Consensus was reached on at least one clear and valid indicator by which to measure each principle. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus has been obtained on eight principles of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. They may help commissioners, researchers and consumers to deepen their understanding of this issue, and can be used to guide good practice.     

A comparison of sources of nursing stress and job satisfaction among mental handicap and hospice nursing staff

This study compares sources of nursing stress and job satisfaction among 181 mental handicap and 24 hospice nurses. It was hypothesized that nursing stress varies as a consequence of nursing specialty. Analysis of variance revealed differing features of nursing stress between the two specialties. Hospice nurses reported stress as primarily associated with death and dying and inadequate preparation to meet the emotional needs of patients and their families, while mental handicap nurses reported stress related to workload, conflict with other nurses and nursing environment. The results suggest that two additional factors that did not differ between specialties require further examination, namely patient behaviour and purposelessness of nursing care. Job satisfaction also differed between specialties with hospice nurses reporting higher satisfaction with supervision, co-workers, and pay, and lower satisfaction with promotion in comparison to mental handicap nurses. Within the mental handicap groups nursing stress correlated with job satisfaction, state-trait anxiety and non-psychotic psychiatric disturbance in predicted directions. Analysis of the above variables with respect to mental handicap nursing grade was also undertaken. Overall results indicate the importance of nursing specialty as a major factor influencing nursing stress.     

Comparison of two warming interventions in surgical patients with mild and moderate hypothermia

Two interventions: a forced warm-air device (Bair-Hugger series 500, Augustine Medical Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, USA), group 1; and a standardized approach to the use of warmed blankets (group 2) are compared with the aim of enhancing thermoregulation in surgical patients with mild and moderate hypothermia in the immediate recovery period. One hundred and twenty patients in a post-anaesthetic care unit were systematically allocated to group 1 or group 2 so each group consisted of 110 participants. No significant differences were found between the groups in gender, age, time in surgery, use of warmed intravenous fluids or muscle relaxants, or type of surgery. After exclusion of orthopaedic patients, significant differences in the mean rewarming rates were found, with more rapid rewarming occurring within group 1 (the group rewarmed with a forced warm-air device, t = 2.15, df = 92, P = 0.03) compared with group 2. No significant differences were found in the mean rewarming time, or heat gain between groups, and subsequent power estimates were less than 0.80. This study supports improved rewarming rates in select surgical patients (with mild or moderate hypothermia) using the Bair-Hugger^TM compared with a standardized blanket rewarming intervention and identifies the need for patient comfort and cost-benefit analysis to be considered in future studies.     

Drug-related admissions to an Australian hospital

This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of drug-related hospital admissions in southern Tasmania, Australia. The causes of consecutive admissions to medical wards of the Royal Hobart Hospital were reviewed. Comprehensive data were collected over a 10-week period on 691 admissions (median age: 67 years and range: 11–97 years; 50.8% males). Sixty-eight (9-8%) of the admissions were classified as being either probably or definitely drug-related. Most of these admissions were attributable to intentional overdose (38.2%) or an adverse drug reaction (30.9%). The overdoses often involved benzodiazepines or antipsychotics. Gastrointestinal bleeding related to the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was the most common adverse drug reaction (38.1% of all reactions). Other drug-related admission categories were poor compliance (14.7%), dosage decrease or therapy cessation by a doctor producing an exacerbation of symptoms (7.4%), substance abuse (4.4%) and drug interaction (4.4%). Patients with a drug-related admission were, on average, younger than the other medical admissions, with no significant difference in gender. Patients admitted due to an overdose or substance abuse were younger than other drug-related admissions and non-drug related admissions. In conclusion, this study has determined that almost 10% of medical admissions to the hospital are drug-related and it is estimated that 40 to 50 elderly people are admitted each year suffering from gastrointestinal bleeding related to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.     

Further Validation and Responsiveness Assessment of the Herpes Outbreak Impact Questionnaire and Herpes Symptom Checklist

Objective:  The Herpes Outbreak Impact Questionnaire (HOIQ) and Herpes Symptom Checklist (HSC) are patient-completed questionnaires for assessing genital herpes outbreaks. This report describes the validation of paper-and-pencil versions of the scales and responsiveness assessments in an Australian clinical trial.
Methods:  Acceptability of the language of the original UK versions was tested with Australians. The HOIQ and HSC were then field-tested with patients. The new versions were validated using patients' daily responses to the questionnaires in a famciclovir study.
Results:  The HOIQ and HSC were readily adapted into Australian English and were acceptable to patients. Psychometric sample: N = 151; 81 (54%) male; mean age 39.9 ± 11.6 years; mean outbreaks 5.1 ± 3.0 per year. Internal consistency was good (alphas at outbreak 1 ranged 0.84–0.90 HOIQ and 0.73–0.87 HSC). Rasch analysis showed item stability over time. Correlations between HOIQ and HSC ranged from 0.46 to 0.60. Both scales distinguished outbreak healing presence or absence at day 6 ( P  = 0.001), and the HOIQ scale distinguished between symptom severity groups ( P  < 0.001). Scale scores declined significantly over study duration, exhibiting large effect sizes.
Conclusions:  The paper-and-pencil HOIQ and HSC were reliable, valid, and responsive in a clinical trial setting. These instruments are recommended for use in clinical studies.     

Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research

Objective  To investigate health researchers' attitudes to involving the public in research.
Background  Public involvement in research is encouraged by the Department of Health in the UK. Despite this, the number of health researchers actively involving the public in research appears to be limited. There is little research specifically addressing the attitudes of health researchers towards involving the public: how they interpret the policy, what motivates and de-motivates them and what their experiences have been to date.
Design  A qualitative research design, using semi-structured telephone interviews.
Setting and participants  Fifteen purposively sampled UK-based University health researchers were the participants. Interviews were conducted over the telephone.
Findings  The participants suggested varying constructions of public involvement in research. Arguments based on moral and political principles and consequentialist arguments for involving the public in research were offered and most participants highlighted the potential benefits of involving the public. However, feelings of apprehension expressed by some participants imply that a number of researchers may still be uncomfortable with involving the public, as it presents a different way of working.     

Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study

Background Public involvement is central to health and social research policies, yet few systematic evaluations of its impact have been carried out, raising questions about the feasibility of evaluating the impact of public involvement. Objective To investigate whether it is feasible to evaluate the impact of public involvement on health and social research. Methods Mixed methods including a two‐round Delphi study with pre‐specified 80% consensus criterion, with follow‐up interviews. UK and international panellists came from different settings, including universities, health and social care institutions and charitable organizations. They comprised researchers, members of the public, research managers, commissioners and policy makers, self‐selected as having knowledge and/or experience of public involvement in health and/or social research; 124 completed both rounds of the Delphi process. A purposive sample of 14 panellists was interviewed. Results Consensus was reached that it is feasible to evaluate the impact of public involvement on 5 of 16 impact issues: identifying and prioritizing research topics, disseminating research findings and on key stakeholders. Qualitative analysis revealed the complexities of evaluating a process that is subjective and socially constructed. While many panellists believed that it is morally right to involve the public in research, they also considered that it is appropriate to evaluate the impact of public involvement. Conclusions This study found consensus among panellists that it is feasible to evaluate the impact of public involvement on some research processes, outcomes and on key stakeholders. The value of public involvement and the importance of evaluating its impact were endorsed.