Apoptotic DNA binds to HLA class II molecules inhibiting antigen presentation and participating in the development of anti-inflammatory functional behavior of phagocytic macrophages

Resident macrophages are mainly responsible for the clearance of apoptotic cells from tissue by phagocytosis. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells is not accompanied by activation of inflammatory mechanisms, unlike what happens when necrotic phenomena occur. We analyzed the effect of phagocytosis of apoptotic bodies on macrophage cell functions. After phagocytosis of apoptotic cells macrophages were unable to present an exogenous antigen to autologous antigen-specific T-cell lines. The inhibition was mediated by different mechanisms including binding of apoptotic DNA to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II molecules of macrophages, decreased expression of co-stimulatory molecules and increased secretion of tumor growth factor beta (TGFbeta). When dendritic cells were cultured with macrophages phagocytosing apoptotic cells, or with their supernatant, impaired dendritic cell antigen presenting activity and reduced tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) secretion were found. Our results suggest that: (1) the phagocytosis of apoptotic bodies inhibits macrophage antigen presentation; (2) such inhibition is mediated by the binding of apoptotic DNA to macrophage HLA class II molecules as well as by the activation of biological mechanisms that induce an anti-inflammatory functional behavior in macrophages; and (3) macrophages phagocytosing apoptotic cells inhibit antigen presentation of neighboring dendritic cells via TGFbeta secretion. These events are likely related to the preservation of healthy tissues from the onset of inflammation.     

Immunohistochemical classification of non-BRCA1/2 tumors identifies different groups that demonstrate the heterogeneity of BRCAX families.

Around 25% of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families have mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The search for other genes has until now failed, probably because there is not one single BRCAX gene, but rather various genes that may each be responsible for a small number of breast cancer families and/or may interact according to a polygenic model. We have studied 50 tumors from probands belonging to non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families (BRCAX), using 25 immunohistochemical markers. The objective was to classify these tumors and confirm that they are heterogeneous. Unsupervised cluster analysis showed the existence of the following two main groups of tumors: high-grade and estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors (50%), and low-grade and ER-positive tumors (50%). In addition we identified five subgroups, three among the high-grade and two among the low-grade groups; one overexpressing HER-2 (18%); one with a basal-like phenotype (14%); one with a normal breast-like phenotype (18%); a luminal A subgroup (36%), and a luminal B subgroup (14%). Hypermethylation of the BRCA1 gene was observed in 42% of the cases, spread across all five subgroups, but only 37% of those had loss of heterozygosity as well. These latter cases were all clustered in the high-grade group and the majority of them in the basal-like subgroup. Our results show that familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors are heterogeneous and suggest a polygenic model for explaining the majority of BRCAX families. In addition we have defined a subset of them that have somatic inactivation of the BRCA1 gene.     

Immunohistochemical expression of DNA repair proteins in familial breast cancer differentiate BRCA2-associated tumors.

PURPOSE: Morphologic and immunohistochemical studies of familial breast cancers have identified specific characteristics associated with BRCA1 mutation-associated tumors when compared with BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 tumors, but have not identified differences between BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 tumors. Because BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes participate in the DNA repair pathway, we have performed an immunohistochemical study with markers related to this pathway to establish the profile of the three groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have studied two tissue microarrays that include 103 familial and 104 sporadic breast tumors, with a panel of DNA repair markers including ATM, CHEK2, RAD51, RAD50, XRCC3, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. RESULTS: We found more frequent expression of CHEK2 in BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors than in non-BRCA1/2 and sporadic tumors. We found absence of nuclear expression and presence of cytoplasmic expression of RAD51 in BRCA2 tumors that differentiate them from other familial tumors. We validated these results with a new series of patient cases. The final study with 253 familial patient cases (74 BRCA1, 71 BRCA2, 108 non-BRCA1/2), and 288 sporadic patient cases, has allowed us to confirm our preliminary results. Because BRCA2 tumors present a specific immunohistochemical profile for RAD51 and CHEK2 markers that is different from non-BRCA1/2 tumors, we have built a multivariate model with these markers that distinguish both tumors with an estimated probability of at least 76%. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that BRCA2 tumors demonstrate more cytoplasmic and less nuclear RAD51 staining, and increased CHEK2 staining. This pattern may distinguish BRCA2 from familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors.     

Nonlinear dynamics of heart rate variability in response to orthostatism and hemodialysis in chronic renal failure patients: Recurrence analysis approach

We studied the response of heart rate variability to hemodialysis and orthostatism using traditional linear indexes and 9 recurrence quantification analysis indexes to reveal changes in the heart rate dynamics. Twenty healthy subjects and 19 chronic renal failure patients treated with hemodialysis thrice a week were included. Five-minute heart rate variability time series were obtained during supine position (clinostatism) and orthostatism from each participant; recordings in renal patients were repeated after hemodialysis. Linear indexes were consistent with sympathetic predominance in response to orthostatism in the control group. Renal patients before hemodialysis showed increased sympathetic predominance in clinostatism, with further increase in orthostatism and hemodialysis. In response to orthostatism, 4 recurrence indexes changed in the control group, while in renal patients any of them changed before hemodialysis and 1 changed after hemodialysis. In clinostatism, renal patients (both before and after hemodialysis) had higher laminarity, trapping time, and recurrence time than the control group. Recurrence indexes showed that the heart rate dynamics in renal patients are different from healthy subjects, suggesting loss of access to some regulatory conditions. These findings are consistent with reports of sympathetic stimulation induced by hemodialysis and active standing.