Cardiac Intervention Before Liver Transplantation

BackgroundCardiovascular complication is one of the leading causes of mortality after liver transplantation (LT). Thus, a thorough cardiac evaluation is a must before proceeding to a liver transplant surgery. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent and to a lesser extent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are both valuable treatment options for patients with coronary artery disease.MethodsA retrospective, single-center study that included patients who underwent cardiac intervention and subsequent LT for end-stage liver disease. All patients who had PCI or CABG were included in the study.ResultsTwenty-nine adult patients out of 51 had a cardiac intervention before liver transplantation. Twenty-four patients had a diagnostic PCI, 3 patients had therapeutic PCI with stent, and 2 had failed PCI and proceeded to CABG before liver transplant. The mean age of the patients was 60.5 years. There were 24 men. All patients had cirrhosis. The 2 CABG cases were done during the same admission with a 13- and 18-day interval between the CABG and the transplantation. Both cases were live-related liver transplantation. No mortality was reported.ConclusionIn case of PCI failure, CABG may be a valuable and safe treatment option for cirrhotic patients as a preparation for liver transplantation. Live donor liver transplantation may be a good back-up for those patients in case they develop hepatic decompensation.     

Organ preservation: experience with University of Wisconsin solution and plans for the future

Transplantation of organs continues to be a primary therapeutic modality for treatment of end-stage organ disease, and 1-year graft survival rates show increasing improvements for most organs. A number of transplant centers show 1-yr graft survival rates approaching 90% or more for the kidney, liver and pancreas. Rejection continues to be the major cause for loss of organs and there is still a major shortage of organs for transplantation. Additionally, many organs showed delayed graft function (or primary nonfunction) which may be related to either donor factors or preservation factors. The University of Wisconsin solution for organ preservation has increased the safe time of preservation for the liver, kidney, and pancreas and helped to increase the quality and number of organs available for transplantation. However, the long-range goal of organ preservation (unlimited preservation) is still far from being reached. In the past, preservation could accurately be categorized as an art and preservation solutions were developed based upon theoretical rationales about the mechanisms of organ injury at hypothermia and what agents would suppress injury. The utility and success of this approach is exemplified by the developments of Collins solution and the UW solution. However, further developments in methods to increase the quality and duration of preservation of all transplantable organs would appear to be dependent upon defining, systematically, how organs are injured and what can be done to suppress the injury.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Liver transplantation from controlled non-heart-beating donors

BACKGROUND: The use of organs from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) has been proposed as one way to increase the donor pool. However, few centers have transplanted livers from NHBDs. We report here the results of 19 liver transplants from controlled NHBDs. METHODS: From January 1993 through August 1999, 364 liver transplantations were performed from heart-beating donors (HBDs) and 19 liver transplantations were performed from NHBDs. Donor and recipient characteristics, posttransplant complications, and patient and allograft survival were compared. RESULTS: No differences in hepatic artery, portal vein, or biliary complications were noted between the groups. However, the rate of primary nonfunction was higher in recipients of livers from NHBDs (10.5% vs. 1.3%; P = .04). No difference in patient survival was seen between recipients of NHBDs or HBDs (72.6% vs. 84.8%; P =.36); however, allograft survival was lower in recipients who received livers from NHBDs (53.8% vs. 80.9%; P =.007). CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation from controlled NHBDs results in similar patient survival and post-transplant complications. However, primary nonfunction was higher and allograft survival was less in recipients of livers from NHBDs. The results of liver transplantation from controlled NHBDs are encouraging and should continue to be cautiously pursued as one way to help alleviate the current shortage of donor livers.     

Long‐term analysis of phase II studies of single‐agent lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a type of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with aggressive disease characteristics resulting in multiple relapses after initial treatment. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent approved in the US for patients with relapsed/refractory MCL following bortezomib based on results from 3 multicenter phase II studies (2 including relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL and 1 focusing on MCL post‐bortezomib). The purpose of this report is to provide longer follow‐up on the MCL‐001 study (follow‐ups were 6.8 [NHL‐002], 7.6 [NHL‐003], and 52.2 [MCL‐001] months). The 206 relapsed MCL patients treated with single‐agent lenalidomide (25 mg/day PO, days 1 to 21 every 28‐days) had a median age of 67 years (63% ≥65 years), 91% with stage III/IV disease, and 50% with ≥4 previous treatment regimens. With a median follow‐up of X, the combined best overall response rate (ORR) was 33% (including 11% with complete remission [CR]/CR unconfirmed CRu). Lenalidomide produced rapid and durable responses with a median time to response of 2.2 months and median duration of response (DOR) of 16.6 months (95% CI: 11.1%‐29.8%). The safety profile was consistent and manageable; myelosuppression was the most common adverse event (AE). Overall, single‐agent lenalidomide showed consistent efficacy and safety in multiple phase II studies of heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, including those previously treated with bortezomib.     

Cadaveric renal transplantation with quadruple immunosuppression in patients with a positive antiglobulin crossmatch

The significance of the antiglobulin crossmatch in the cyclosporine era remains controversial. Over an 11-month period, 124 recipients of cadaveric renal allografts (109 primary, 15 nonprimary) were retrospectively crossmatched via the antiglobulin technique. Criteria for recipient selection for transplantation included a negative T lymphocytotoxic (CDC) crossmatch for current and historical sera. Fourteen patients (11.3%) underwent transplantation in the setting of a negative T and positive antiglobulin crossmatch. The patient group included 10 female and 4 male patients with a mean age of 43.8 years. All but one patient received a primary transplant, and current sera were positive in the antiglobulin crossmatch in all cases. The mean HLA-ABDR match was 1.4 (range 0-4). Preoperative PRA titers ranged from 0 to 80% (mean 18.3%). All patients underwent successful renal transplantation with quadruple immunosuppression consisting of prednisone, azathioprine, and the sequential use of MALG/cyclosporine. There were no episodes of hyperacute rejection. However, 10 patients (71.4%) experienced acute rejection, including 7 episodes within 4 days of transplant. Early rejection was significantly more common in patients with a positive antiglobulin test (50% vs. 20.9%, P less than 0.05). The mean one-month serum creatinine was 1.7 mg/dl. Actual patient and allograft survival are 92.9% and 85.7%, respectively. Risk factors for a positive antiglobulin crossmatch included female sex and prior sensitization as measured by PRA. Although these patients represent a high-risk group for early rejection, no adverse effect on patient or graft survival was noted with quadruple immunotherapy. In conclusion, a positive antiglobulin crossmatch is no longer a contraindication to renal transplantation with current immunosuppressive strategies.     

Human liver allograft acceptance and the "tolerance assay": in vitro anti-donor T cell assays show hyporeactivity to donor cells, but unlike DTH, fail to detect linked suppression.

Human allograft acceptance is associated with immune regulation, characterized by donor-antigen-linked suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH). We wished to determine if "classical" in vitro assays of alloreactivity could also detect linked suppression and thus be useful in the clinical diagnosis of active immune regulation. We analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a group of eight liver transplant recipients, one of whom had stopped all immunosuppression 4.5 years ago yet continues to have good graft function (graft acceptor). The regulator phenotype was defined as the ability to suppress a DTH response to a recall antigen in the presence of donor antigen. Using the trans vivo DTH test, we identified four regulators, and four nonregulators. When we tested two of the regulators for in vitro mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses to B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (B-LCL), we found both patients to be specifically hyporesponsive to donor compared with third-party B-LCL stimulators. However, in contrast to the linked suppression of DTH seen when a given B-LCL expressed donor-type HLA-B antigens, there was no evidence of linked suppression in vitro, either in CTL, proliferative, or interferon-gamma cytokine release assays. The primary CTL hyporesponsiveness to donor B-LCL could not be reversed by neutralizing antibodies to transforming growth factor beta or interleukin-10, which could restore a strong DTH response to donor B-LCL. We conclude that DTH analysis can readily detect donor antigen-linked suppression in liver transplant recipients. CTL and MLC tests failed to do so. These findings may be relevant to the development of a tolerance assay suitable for use in clinical trials.     

Superior Long-Term Results of Simultaneous Pancreas–Kidney Transplantation from Pediatric Donors

The shortage of cadaveric donors for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation has prompted the use of cadaveric organs from pediatric donors. The long-term outcome and its impact on overall long-term survival are unknown. A total of 680 recipients receiving cadaver Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation from pediatric and adult donors between July 1986 and September 2001 were analyzed and compared. Ten-year kidney and pancreas graft survival for SPK transplantation from donors aged <18 years (n = 142) were 80% and 72%, respectively, compared to 61% pancreas and kidney graft survival from donors > or =18 years of age (n = 538; p = 0.03 and 0.05, respectively). Five years post-transplant, blood glucose, HbA1c and creatinine clearance were significantly better in recipients from pediatric donors (85.3 +/- 13 mg/dL, 5.5 +/- 3.5% and 65.6 +/- 16 mL/min, respectively), compared to recipients from adult donors (95.1 +/- 29 mg/dL, 5.9 +/- 3.5% and 58.3 +/- 17 mL/min; p = 0.001, 0.01 and 0.002, respectively). Causes of graft failure for kidney and pancreas transplants were similar between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was observed in patient survival between recipients from pediatric donors compared to adult donors (85% vs. 76%, p = 0.29). When recipients of SPK from pediatric donors were stratified according to age (3-11 years and 12-17 years) and compared, no difference in kidney or pancreas graft survival was observed (kidney 76.4% vs. 81.3%, p = 0.15; pancreas 75% vs. 76%, p = 0.10, respectively). Pediatric donors represent a valuable source of organs, providing excellent short- and long-term outcomes. Wide utilization of pediatric organs will substantially increase the donor pool.     

The use of UW solution in clinical transplantation. A 4-year experience.

The development of the University of Wisconsin (UW) cold storage solution has extended safe preservation of the liver and pancreas from 6 to 24 hours or more. From May 1987 until November 1991, 288 livers and 163 simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplants were performed using UW solution. The mean preservation times were: liver, 12.7 +/- 4.4 hours, pancreas 17.2 +/- 4.4 hours, and kidney, 19.2 +/- 4.3 hours. Included in this series were 35 reduced-sized liver transplants, 7 cluster transplants, and 132 combined liver/pancreas retrievals. No differences in allograft function or graft-related complications were seen in organs preserved for less than or longer than 12 hours or in grafts from combined liver/pancreas retrievals. All pancreas/kidney transplants and most liver transplants were performed semi-electively. Actuarial 1-month patient and graft survival after liver transplantation was 91.4% and 80.2%, and at 4 years was 74.0% and 62.0%, respectively. After pancreas/kidney transplantation, the actuarial patient survival at 1 month and 4 years was 99.4% and 90.5%, respectively, whereas pancreatic and renal allograft survival at 1 month was 97.5% and 96.8%, and at 4 years was 83.0% and 83.4%, respectively. The ability to extend preservation times with UW solution has many advantages; however, the most important contribution of UW solution to clinical transplantation has been the increased utilization of scarce donor organs for more recipients because the previously imposed constraints on preservation time have been removed.