Comparison of fentanyl with clonidine as adjuvants for epidural analgesia with 0.125% bupivacaine in the first stage of labor: a preliminary report

48 primiparae received epidural analgesia in labor with 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:800 000, and then were divided in 4 equal groups (n = 12) to receive one of the following: 5 ml saline (B); 100 mug of fentanyl (BF); 150 microg of clonidine (BC); 75 microg of clonidine and 50 microg of fentanyl (BCF). All the patients had satisfactory analgesia. Onset was similar in the 4 groups but the duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged by the addition of either 100 microg of fentanyl or 150 microg of clonidine (respectively 89.8 min and 92.5 min vs 62.5 min) (P < 0.0001). The addition of both clonidine (75 microg) and fentanyl (50 microg) produced a considerably prolonged analgesia (177.5 min) (P < 0.0001). No episodes of bradycardia were observed. Hypotension, reversed by i.v. ephedrine, occurred in 2 patients of BCF group and in 1 patient of BF and BC groups. Only patients receiving fentanyl had pruritus. Both fentanyl and clonidine produced sedation, but both incidence and severity were greater with the mixture. No differences in neonatal outcome assessed by Apgar scores and NACS, were observed.     

Anaesthesia for ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval: midazolam/remifentanil versus propofol/fentanyl regimens

To evaluate the quality of intra-operative anaesthesia and recovery characteristics of two different anaesthesia regimens, 60 healthy women undergoing ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization procedures were randomly allocated to receive either a propofol/fentanyl or a midazolam/remifentanil based anaesthesia. The surgical procedure was successful in all patients and no severe side effects were reported by any patient. Four patients in the midazolam/remifentanil group (13%) would not accept the same anaesthetic procedure for further in vitro fertilization treatment due to intra-operative awareness, while all propofol/fentanyl patients were prepared to accept the same procedure again (P < 0.05). Patients in the propofol/fentanyl group required manual ventilation more frequently through a facemask than those patients treated with the midazolam/remifentanil combination (50% and 30%, respectively; P < 0.05). The time to achieve an Aldrete's score of 10 was shorter in the midazolam/remifentanil patients (2 +/- 2 min) than in those who received propofol/fentanyl (4 +/- 2 min) (P < 0.001), but no differences were observed in the time required to be 'fit to discharge' from the post-anaesthesia care unit. We conclude that the use of a midazolam/remifentanil regimen is as effective and safe as a fentanyl/propofol regimen in patients undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization procedures.     

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and lethal diseases: A new perspective

Lethal cancer and chronic untreatable viral disease with life threatening consequences are among the major burden for morbidity and mortality in the western world. A large number of resources are employed every year in identification of new drugs to treat this condition. A remarkable percentage of resources are wasted for safety concerns about possible acute cardiac or pulmonary toxicity of the new identified compounds, that are rejected without further development even when promising. ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is an established technique to support and replace cardio-pulmonary function that underwent rapid technologic improvement in the last years, resulting in reduced complication rate. ECMO has been used with success to treat acute life-threatening cardiac and pulmonary toxicity. Our hypothesis is that the new ECMO technological improvement could make this technique available to other setting, such as lethal cancer and infectious diseases, where it can provide a safe base to overwhelm acute cardiac and pulmonary toxicity of chemotoxic drugs and techniques. New drugs and old promising compounds rejected for toxicity could thus be re-introduced and employed, opening a new scenario in the treatment of life-threatening diseases.     

"Ultrasound comet-tail images": a marker of pulmonary edema: a comparative study with wedge pressure and extravascular lung water

BACKGROUND: Echographic examination of the lung surface may reveal multiple "comet-tail images" originating from water-thickened interlobular septa. These images could be useful for noninvasive assessment of interstitial pulmonary edema. STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung comet-tail images compared with chest radiography, wedge pressure, and extravascular lung water (EVLW) quantified by the indicator dilution method (PiCCO System, version 4.1; Pulsion Medical Systems; Munich, Germany). METHODS AND PATIENTS: We enrolled 20 patients (mean age, 62.6 +/- 11.5 years [+/- SD]). Patients were studied before, immediately after, and 24 h following cardiac surgery with chest ultrasound, chest radiography, pulmonary artery catheterization, and the PiCCO system. Performing echo scanning (right and left hemithorax, from second to fourth intercostal space, from parasternal to midaxillary line), an individual patient comet score was obtained by summing the number of comets in each scanned space. RESULTS: A total of 60 comparisons were obtained. Significant positive linear correlations were found between comet score and EVLW determined by the PiCCO System (r = 0.42, p = 0.001), between comet score and wedge pressure (r = 0.48, p = 0.01), and between comet score and radiologic lung water score (r = 0.60, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence and the number of comet-tail images provide reliable information on interstitial pulmonary edema. Therefore, ultrasonography represent an attractive, easy-to-use, bedside diagnostic tool for assessing cardiac function and pulmonary congestion.     

The effect of concomitant radiofrequency ablation and surgical technique (repair versus replacement) on release of cardiac biomarkers during mitral valve surgery

All patients undergoing heart surgery experience a certain amount of nonspecific myocardial injury documented by the release of cardiac biomarkers and associated with poor outcome. We investigated the role of unipolar radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation on the release of cardiac biomarkers in 71 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery and concomitant left atrial ablation case-matched with 71 patients undergoing isolated mitral surgery. The study was powered to detect a 3 ng/mL difference. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of cardiac troponin I (10 +/- 5.3 versus 12 + 10.4 ng/mL; P = 0.7) or creatine kinase-MB (50 +/- 21.8 versus 57 +/- 62.0 ng/mL; P = 0.5) release. Postoperative peak cardiac troponin I levels had univariate associations with the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (P = 0.002) and aortic cross-clamping (P = 0.001) and with the surgical technique (15 +/- 12 ng/mL for mitral valve replacement versus 9 +/- 4.8 for mitral valve repair; P = 0.0007) at univariate analysis. Mitral valve replacement was the only independent predictor of postoperative peak release of cardiac troponin I identified with multivariate analysis (P = 0.005). Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation does not significantly increase cardiac biomarker release compared with isolated mitral surgery; mitral valve repair is associated with less release of cardiac biomarkers compared with mitral valve replacement.