Effect of Induction Therapy Protocols on Transplant Outcomes in Crossmatch Positive Renal Allograft Recipients Desensitized with IVIG

Here we retrospectively examine the efficacy of two antibody induction regimens using Zenapax or Thymoglobulin in patients with positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches (CDC-CMXs) desensitized with IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin). Between January 1999 and March 2005, 97 patients with (+) CDC-CMXs received kidney transplants (43 deceased donors/54 living donors). All patients received at least 2 g/kg IVIG (maximum four doses) until an acceptable CMX was obtained. Patients were divided into two groups: 1. IVIG + Zenapax (n = 58), 2. IVIG + Thymoglobulin (n = 39). A total of 94% of patients in Group 1 and 84% in G2 have at least 2 years of follow up. Patient and graft survival was 96%/84% in Group 1 and 100%/90% in Group 2, p = NS. The number and severity of AR episodes were similar (36% Group 1 vs. 31% Group 2, p = NS) as was the incidence of C4d (+) antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (Banff Grade II/III) (22% Group 1 vs. 21% Group 2). Mean serum creatinines (SCrs) at 24 months were similar (Group 1: 1.4 +/- 0.7 vs. G2: 1.5 +/- 0.7 mg/dL). Induction therapy with Zenapax or Thymoglobulin results in excellent patient, graft survival and graft function at 2 years. There was no increased risk of viral infections or malignancies with either agent. Neither agent was effective in reducing the incidence of AMR.     

Pulsatile Perfusion Reduces the Incidence of Delayed Graft Function in Expanded Criteria Donor Kidney Transplantation

The use of expanded criteria donors (ECD) has been proposed to help combat the discrepancy between organ availability and need. ECD kidneys are associated with delayed graft function (DGF) and worse long-term survival. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of pulsatile perfusion (PP) on DGF and graft survival in transplanted ECD kidneys. From January 2000 to December 2003, 4618 ECD kidney-alone transplants were reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing. PP was performed on 912 renal allografts. The prognostic factors of DGF were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Risk factors for reduced allograft viability were greater in donors and recipients of PP kidneys. Three-year graft survival of ECD kidneys preserved with PP was similar to cold storage (CS) kidneys. The incidence of DGF in PP kidneys was significantly lower than CS kidneys (26% vs. 36%, p < 0.001). Despite having a greater number of risk factors for reduced graft viability, the ECD-PP kidneys had similar graft survival compared to ECD-CS kidneys. The use of PP, by decreasing the incidence of DGF, may possibly lead to lower overall costs and increased utilization of donor kidneys.     

Infection and Malignancy Outweigh Cardiovascular Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Post Hoc Analysis of the FAVORIT Trial

Objective

Now that long-term survival after successful renal transplantation is no longer limited by excessive cardiovascular risk, the primary care physician should consider that infection and malignancy are leading noncardiovascular causes of death even in the recipient with diabetes.

Conversion From Twice‐Daily Tacrolimus to Once‐Daily Extended Release Tacrolimus (LCPT): The Phase III Randomized MELT Trial

Phase III noninferiority trial examining efficacy and safety of converting stable renal transplant recipients from twice‐daily tacrolimus to a novel extended‐release once‐daily tacrolimus formulation (LCPT) with a controlled agglomeration technology. Controls maintained tacrolimus twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients with efficacy failures (death, graft failure, locally read biopsy‐proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss to follow‐up) within 12 months. Starting LCPT dose was 30% lower (15% for blacks) than preconversion tacrolimus dose; target trough levels were 4–15 ng/mL. A total of 326 patients were randomized; the mITT population (n = 162 each group) was similar demographically in the two groups. Mean daily dose of LCPT was significantly (p < 0.0001) lower than preconversion tacrolimus dose at each visit; mean trough levels between groups were similar. There were four efficacy failures in each group; safety outcomes were similar between groups. Frequency of premature study drug discontinuation was LCPT: 12% versus tacrolimus twice daily: 5% (p = 0.028). LCPT demonstrated noninferiority to tacrolimus twice daily in efficacy failure rates. LCPT may offer a safe and effective alternative for converting patients to a once‐daily formulation. Compared to currently available tacrolimus formulation, LCPT requires lower doses to achieve target trough levels.     

LCPT once‐daily extended‐release tacrolimus tablets versus twice‐daily capsules: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 trials in important de novo and stable kidney transplant recipient subgroups

African‐American and elderly kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have increased risk for poor clinical outcomes post‐transplant. Management of immunosuppression may be challenging in these patients and contribute to worse outcomes. A novel once‐daily formulation of tacrolimus (LCPT) has demonstrated noninferiority, similar safety, improved bioavailability, a consistent concentration time profile, and less peak and peak‐trough fluctuations vs. tacrolimus twice‐daily (Tac BID). This pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized, controlled trials, including 861 (LCPT N = 428; Tac BID N = 433; 38% of patients were stable KTR, and 62% were de novo KTR) patients, examined the efficacy of LCPT in KTR subgroups (blacks, females, and age ≥65). Overall, treatment failure [death, graft failure, centrally read biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR), or lost to follow‐up] at 12 months was as follows: LCPT: 11.9%, BID Tac: 13.4% [?1.48% (?5.95%, 2.99%)]. BPAR rates were as follows: LCPT: 8.2%, Tac BID: 9.5% [?1.29% (?5.14%, 2.55%)]. Numerically, fewer treatment failure events with LCPT were found in the majority of subgroups, with significantly less treatment failure associated with LCPT among black KTR [?13.82% (?27.22%, ?0.31%)] and KTR ≥65 [?13.46% (?25.27%, ?0.78%)]. This pooled analysis suggests numerically lower efficacy failure rates associated with LCPT among high‐risk subgroups, in particular black KTR and KTR ≥65 years old.     

Bone and mineral disorders after kidney transplantation: Therapeutic strategies

Mineral and bone diseases (MBD) are common in patients with chronic kidney disease who undergo kidney transplantation. The incidence, types and severity of MBD vary according to the duration of chronic kidney disease, presence of comorbid conditions and intake of certain medications. Moreover, multiple types of pathology may be responsible for MBD. After successful reversal of uremia by kidney transplantation, many bone and mineral disorders improve, while immunosuppression, other medications, and new and existing comorbidities may result in new or worsening MBD. Chronic kidney disease is also common after kidney transplantation and may impact bone and mineral disease. In this article, we reviewed the prevalence, pathophysiology, and impact of MBD on post-transplant outcomes. We also discussed the diagnostic approach; immunosuppression management and potential treatment of MBD in kidney transplant recipients.     

Meta-analysis: Effect of hepatitis C virus infection on mortality in dialysis

BACKGROUND: The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection among patients on long-term dialysis treatment remains incompletely understood. Efforts to elucidate the natural history of hepatitis C virus in this population are difficult because of the slowly progressive nature of hepatitis C virus with often an unrecognized onset in patients whose life-expectancy is substantially diminished by end-stage renal disease. AIM: To conduct a systematic review of the published medical literature concerning the impact of hepatitis C virus infection on the survival of patients receiving chronic dialysis. The relative risk of mortality was regarded as the most reliable outcome end-point. METHODS: We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to generate a summary estimate of the relative risk for mortality with hepatitis C virus across the published studies. RESULTS: We identified four clinical trials (2341 unique patients); three (75%) of them were prospective, cohort studies; the fourth was a case-control study. Pooling of study results demonstrated that presence of antihepatitis C virus antibody was an independent and significant risk factor for death in patients on maintenance dialysis. The summary estimate for relative risk was 1.57 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.33-1.86. A test for homogeneity of the relative risks across the four studies gave a P-value of 0.77. As a cause of death, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis were significantly more frequent among antihepatitis C virus-positive than -negative dialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that antihepatitis C virus-positive patients on dialysis have an increased risk of mortality compared with hepatitis C virus-negative patients. The excess risk of death in hepatitis C virus-positive patients may be at least partially attributed to chronic liver disease with its attendant complications. Clinical trials with extended follow-up are currently under way to assess the effect of hepatitis C virus treatment on the excess risk of mortality in this population.     

Controlling treatment allocation bias in a registry analysis when comparing calcineurin inhibitors

Previous analyses of outcomes between immunosuppressive regimens included data from the early years of tacrolimus use and frequently included all Tacrolimus- or cyclosporine-based regimens. We now evaluate clinical outcomes associated with only the two most commonly prescribed regimens--Tacrolimus (Tac)-mycophenylate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine (CsA)-MMF--using recent data reported to the UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry. Data from living donor kidney transplants was chosen to minimize selection bias between treatment groups. Outcomes are reported only for recent years (1998 to 1999 with 3-year follow-up) because acute rejection rates were markedly higher in 1995 to 1997 compared to 1998 to 2000 (38% to 68% vs 21% to 32%) and clinical practice has evolved since 1995, which would have biased results in favor of more recent immunosuppressive regimens. Three-year graft survival for patients transplanted from 1998 to 1999 was significantly higher in living donor kidney transplant patients receiving CsA-MMF (91.1%, n = 4686) versus Tac-MMF (88.1%, n = 2393) (P =.0006). After adjustment for potential confounding variables, risk of graft failure at 3 years was significantly higher in patients receiving Tac-MMF versus CsA-MMF for both all-cause graft failure (hazard ratio 1.28, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.49, P =.002) and death-censored graft failure (hazard ratio 1.25, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.49, P =.013). In view of the reduced rejection rate that has been reported using Tac-MMF versus CsA-MMF in clinical trials, it is possible that the nonimmunologic effects of calcineurin inhibitors may now play an increasingly important role in determining graft survival rates. In conclusion, this large-scale registry analysis demonstrates that graft survival in living donor kidney transplant patients is significantly improved using CsA-MMF compared to Tac-MMF.     

Dual kidneys from marginal adult donors as a source for cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States

The current organ shortage has led to the utilization of double kidney transplants from marginal adult donors, but outcomes data are limited. The United Network for Organ Sharing registry database was used to compare the outcomes of 403 dual adult kidney transplantations (DKT) and 11,033 single kidney transplantations (SKT) from 1997 to 2000. Graft and patient survival and the effect of multiple risk factors were evaluated. It was found that DKT patients were older, less sensitized, and received grafts from older, more mismatched donors with longer cold ischemia times. There was also a greater percentage of donors with a history of diabetes or hypertension and African-American recipients and donors in the DKT group. Graft survival was inferior in the DKT group, with a 7% lower graft survival rate at 1 yr. There was a higher incidence of primary nonfunction in the DKT group, although the incidence of delayed graft function, early rejection treatment, and graft thrombosis did not differ. Multivariate analysis was used to identify African-American recipient ethnicity and retransplant as risk factors for graft loss. Graft survival was comparable in DKT and SKT with donors over 55 yr of age. DKT resulted in inferior graft outcomes compared with SKT. When compared with SKT with donors over 55 yr of age, DKT resulted in similar graft outcomes. These otherwise discarded kidneys should be cautiously considered as a source of marginal donors.     

Case Report: First Reported Combined Heart-Liver Transplant in a Patient With a Congenital Solitary Kidney

We report a case of successful combined heart liver transplant in a patient with a congenital solitary kidney. The patient had normal renal function before combined heart-liver transplantation and developed acute kidney injury requiring slow continuous dialysis and subsequent intermittent dialysis for almost 8 weeks post transplantation. Her renal function recovered and she remains off dialysis now 7 months post transplantation. She only currently has mild chronic renal insufficiency. We believe this is the first reported case of successful heart liver transplant in a patient with a congenital solitary kidney.