Sarcopenia in cirrhosis: from pathogenesis to interventions

Journal of Gastroenterology - Sarcopenia (severe muscle depletion) is a prevalent muscle abnormality in patients with cirrhosis that confers poor prognosis both pre- and post-liver transplantation....     

Should Sarcopenia Increase Priority for Transplant or Is It a Contraindication?

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to discuss the current evidence regarding the impact of sarcopenia on patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation and to determine if its presence should be considered a criterion for expedited transplantation or a contraindication for transplantation.

Recent Findings

Sarcopenia is a negative predictor of survival in patients on a waiting list and after liver transplant. The gut-liver axis and the liver-muscle axis have been explored to understand the complex pathophysiology of sarcopenia.

Summary

Sarcopenia is a frequent finding in patients with cirrhosis. The diagnosis is ideally based on cross-sectional image analysis (CT or MRI) and treatment consists of optimization of caloric and protein intake. To date, prioritizing tools for liver transplantation have not included nutrition or sarcopenia parameters. Patients with a low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) or MELD-Na score and sarcopenia would benefit from prioritization for transplant in order to reduce time on waiting list and therefore mortality.

     

Features associated with treatment failure in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis and predictive value of the model of end-stage liver disease

Autoimmune hepatitis may fail to respond to corticosteroid therapy, but the frequency and bases for this outcome are uncertain. We aimed to determine the frequency and nature of treatment failure in patients with type 1 autoimmune hepatitis, define features associated with its occurrence, and assess if the model for end-stage liver disease can predict this outcome. Patients failing conventional corticosteroid regimens were compared to patients who responded to similar regimens. Fourteen of 214 patients (7%) failed corticosteroid treatment. Patients who failed therapy were younger (33 +/- 3 years versus 48 +/- 1 years, P = 0.0008), had higher serum levels of bilirubin at accession (4.1 +/- 0.9 mg/dL versus 2.3 +/- 0.2 mg/dL, P = 0.02), presented acutely more frequently (43% versus 14%, P = 0.01), and had a higher frequency of HLA (human leukocyte antigen) DRB1*03 (93% versus 53%, P = 0.004) than did patients who achieved remission. An alternative disease (fatty liver disease) emerged in only 1 patient who failed therapy (7%). Scores determined by the model of end-stage liver disease at presentation of patients who failed treatment were higher than those of who achieved remission (16 +/- 1 versus 10 +/- 0.3 points, P < 0.0001), and score greater than 12 points had greater sensitivity (97%) and specificity (68%) for treatment failure than did HLA DRB1*03 or other features. CONCLUSION: Onset at an early age, acute presentation, hyperbilirubinemia, and presence of HLA DRB1*03 characterize patients who fail corticosteroid treatment. The model for end-stage liver disease may be a useful instrument for identifying patients prone to this outcome.     

Clinical significance of HLA DRB103-DRB104 in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: HLA DRB1*03-DRB1*04 combines both susceptibility factors for type-1 autoimmune hepatitis. AIMS: Determine whether this phenotype is a risk factor for autoimmune hepatitis in white North American patients, assess its associations with clinical features and treatment outcome, and determine whether alleles within this phenotype affect prognosis. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-eight patients with type 1 autoimmune hepatitis and 102 normal adults were evaluated. HLA typing was performed by DNA-based techniques. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients had HLA DRB1*03-DRB1*04, and the frequency was higher than in normal subjects (14% vs 4%, OR 4.0%, 95% CI 1.4-11.8, P = 0.01). Patients with DRB1*03-DRB1*04 relapsed less frequently than patients with DRB1*03 (1.3 +/- 0.3 vs 2.1 +/- 0.2, P = 0.04), but they otherwise had outcomes similar to patients with other phenotypes. Patients with DRB1*03-DRB1*04 who had 3-4 alleles encoding lysine at position DRbeta71 within the class II molecule of the major histocompatibility complex developed cirrhosis more commonly (75% vs 9%, P = 0.05) and had a higher frequency of hepatic-related death or liver transplantation (40% vs 0%, P = 0.04) than patients with fewer alleles. CONCLUSIONS: HLA DRB1*03-DRB1*04 is a risk factor for type-1 autoimmune hepatitis, and its impact on outcome relates to the diversity of DRB1*04 alleles that encode a critical motif.     

Transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: predictors of survival

BACKGROUND:

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the mainstay of management for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are not suitable for curative treatments.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine factors associated with mortality after the first TACE procedure.

METHODS:

From January 2004 to May 2008, 60 patients underwent TACE as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical and biochemical parameters before TACE, and response after TACE, were evaluated with conventional classifications (WHO, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST], and European Association for the Study of the Liver [EASL] criteria) and with one-, two- and three-dimensional assessment.

RESULTS:

Overall median survival after the first TACE procedure was 17.1±3.4 months. According to Cox regression analysis, having an alpha-fetoprotein level of greater than 200 ng/mL (HR 2.35 [P=0.02]) and a Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of greater than 10 (HR 4.19 [P=0.001]) were associated with higher risk of mortality; whereas reduction in tumour size measured in one dimension (HR 0.96 [P=0.005]), two dimensions (HR 0.98 [P=0.004]) and three dimensions (HR 0.98 [P=0.001]) was associated with lower risk of mortality. Moreover, reduction in tumour size by 3% or more assessed in one, two or three dimensions was associated with lower risk of mortality (HR 0.48 [P=0.04]; HR 0.36 [P=0.01]; HR 0.31 [P=0.003], respectively). The three conventional classifications were not useful for predicting mortality (WHO: HR 1.07 [P=0.9]; RECIST: HR 0.94 [P=0.9]; EASL: HR 0.94 [P=0.9]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Having an alpha-fetoprotein level of greater than 200 ng/mL and a MELD score of greater than 10 before undergoing TACE was associated with a greater risk of mortality. Conventional classifications of response were not useful for predicting mortality. Reduction in tumour size after the first TACE procedure was associated with better survival, primarily if patients had more than a 3% reduction in tumour size assessed by three-dimensional measurement.     

Locoregional radiological treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma; Which, when and how?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent and deadliest cancers worldwide. Liver transplantation, surgical resection or local ablation offer the best survival advantages but most patients either present when the tumor is in an advanced stage or the degree of underlying liver disease precludes these options. Several therapies have been proposed for these patients with proven survival benefits. These therapies comprise the locoregional treatment for HCC, and include percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and drug-eluting bead (DEB). PEI and RFA are considered curative treatments for early stage HCC; whereas TACE is a standard of care for intermediate stages. Additionally, evaluation of response to locoregional treatment in HCC is important, as objective response may become a surrogate marker for improved survival. Currently, there are several criteria for response assessment, including the World Health Organization (WHO), the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the European Association for the Study of the Liver Criteria (EASL), and the modified RECIST (mRECIST); however, there has been poor correlation between the clinical benefit provided by locoregional interventional therapies and conventional methods of response assessment.The aim of our study was to review and analyze the current evidence for radiological interventions in HCC, and to propose evidence based recommendations to improve the management of these patients.     

Predictive factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis

OBJECTIVE:  Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an uncommon but serious occurrence in autoimmune hepatitis. Our objective was to determine predictors for this neoplasm to improve screening strategies.
METHODS:  Two hundred twenty-seven patients underwent hepatic ultrasonography and serum alpha fetoprotein determinations at 6–12-month intervals.
RESULTS:  Nine patients developed HCC (4%), and each had cirrhosis ≥73 months prior to the malignancy (mean, 110 ± 7 months). By univariate Cox analysis, features at accession associated with a higher risk of HCC were: male gender (Hazard Ratio [HR] 7.0, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.87–26.1, P = 0.004), history of blood transfusion (HR 5.6, 95% CI 1.51–21.1, P = 0.01), thrombocytopenia (HR 7.3, 95% CI 1.89–28.3, P = 0.004), ascites (HR 23.8, 95% CI 4.65–121.8, P = 0.0001), esophageal varices (HR 7.9, 95% CI 1.96–31.8, P = 0.004), and any sign of portal hypertension (HR 19.1, 95% CI 3.91–93.3, P = 0.0003). Features after accession associated with a higher risk of malignancy were: treatment for ≥3 yr (HR 7.6, 95% CI 1.25–18.2, P = 0.02), worsening laboratory tests during corticosteroid therapy (HR 7.6, 95% CI 1.81–32.1, P = 0.006), and cirrhosis for ≥10 yr (HR 8.4, 95% CI 1.69–41.9, P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS:  Male gender, features of portal hypertension, history of blood transfusions, immunosuppressive treatment for ≥3 yr, treatment failure, and cirrhosis of ≥10 yr duration identify patients at risk for HCC. These risk factors should focus screening in autoimmune hepatitis.