首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   2篇
  免费   0篇
临床医学   2篇
  2006年   1篇
  2004年   1篇
排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1
1.
We compared rates of motor blockade, analgesia, adverse effects and patient satisfaction of 0.1% ropivacaine+fentanyl versus 0.2% ropivacaine-alone in a randomized, controlled trial. Fifty-four women who had undergone abdominal hysterectomy were randomly allocated into two groups to receive an epidural block at L1–2 or L2–3: group R received 0.2% ropivacaine-alone and group RF received 0.1% ropivacaine plus 2 μg fentanyl/ml, both at 8 ml/h. Rescue analgesia was provided via a morphine-loaded PCA device. Motor blockade (using a modified Bromage scale), pain intensity (visual analogue scale (VAS)), morphine consumption, level of sensory blockade and adverse effects, were measured at 4, 8 and 21 h after infusion. Patient satisfaction with pain management was assessed at the end of the study. The rates of motor blockade were not different at 8 h after infusion but at 21 h, group RF had significantly less motor blockade than group R. There were no differences in VAS, level of sensory blockade, adverse effects and patient satisfaction. Morphine consumption at each measurement was comparable but the total amount used by group RF was less than group R (12 mg versus 20 mg, P=0.049). Therefore, 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 μg/ml appears to offer advantages over 0.2% ropivacaine-alone.  相似文献   
2.
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号