Postirradiation malignant fibrous histiocytoma expressing cytokeratin. Implications for the immunodiagnosis of sarcomas

A malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the sacrum complicating the course of radiation therapy for endometrial carcinoma is presented. Although the tumor fulfilled the clinical, radiologic, and histologic criteria for a postirradiation malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone, it also expressed cytokeratin. That this immunoreactivity reflected keratin synthesis by the tumor and not an unusual pattern of cross-reactivity with another intermediate filament such as vimentin is strongly suggested by the reproducibility of the immunoreactivity utilizing both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies and extinction of the immunoreactivity following absorption of the primary antiserum with keratin proteins. This is the first reported instance of keratin expression by a malignant fibrous histiocytoma; it indicates that sarcomas apart from synovial sarcoma and epithelioid sarcoma may sometimes express this protein.     

乳腺管状小叶癌

乳腺管状小叶癌（Tubulolobular carcinoma，TLC）最初是被作为小叶癌的管状变型。作者总结了27例TLC的组织学、免疫表型和临床特征，并与纯小管癌和经典型小叶癌进行了比较。此组患者年龄43-79岁（中位年龄60岁）。1例双侧乳腺受累，5例病变为多灶性。肿瘤直径0．5-2．5cm，色灰褐，质硬。组织学观察：TLC的肿瘤细胞形成管状和条索状两种结构模式并相互混杂，且两者比例相当（统称为管状小叶模式）。     

Concurrent and independent genetic alterations in the stromal and epithelial cells of mammary carcinoma: implications for tumorigenesis

The high frequency of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in epithelial cells of mammary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and IDC is a well known phenomenon, whereas the genetic abnormalities in the mammary stroma and its influence on the epithelial component have not been sufficiently studied. Using the PCR, we examined DNA extracts from microdissected stromal and epithelial tissues of 11 breast samples containing DCIS, including five cases associated with IDC. In each case, the mesenchymal tissue consisting of normal-appearing stroma at a distance from DCIS and IDC or stroma close to either DCIS or IDC was manually microdissected. Epithelial cells from morphologically clear-cut normal ducts and lobules, DCIS, and IDC were also microdissected. Twelve polymorphic DNA markers were tested to identify possible genetic alterations in the mesenchymal and epithelial cells on chromosomes 2p, 3p, 11q, 16q, and 17q. Samples from bilateral reduction mammoplasty from 10 women without any clinical, radiological, or pathological abnormalities were also selected as a control (reduction mammoplasty group). Whereas most cases (8/11, 73%) displayed at least one identical LOH in both epithelial and mesenchymal components, LOH at several loci was noted exclusively in stromal cells. The most frequent genetic alterations in the mesenchymal cells were at chromosomes 17q24, 16q23.1-24.2, 3p14.2, and 11q21-23.2, in 87.5, 62, 60, and 45% of informative cases, respectively. The LOH frequency in the stroma close to cancer ranged from 10 to 66.5% for DCIS and from 20 to 75% of informative cases for IDC. Furthermore, 10 of the 12 polymorphic markers revealed LOH in the stroma at a distance, ranging from 11 to 57% of informative cases. None of the control cases (women without any breast disease) revealed LOH either in the epithelial or in the stromal components. Our findings strongly support the concept of stromal-epithelial interaction in the development and progression of mammary neoplasia. Furthermore, this study suggests that genetic alterations in the stromal cells may precede genotypic changes in the epithelial cells. At least in some cases, the mammary stroma in DCIS or IDC apparently represents a neoplastic interactive component rather than a reactive response to the carcinoma. The frequent allelic loss (LOH) in the mammary stroma, identified in our study, may explain some of the fibroblastic abnormalities previously observed in patients with breast carcinoma or a variety of cancer-associated hereditary diseases. We conclude that the mammary stroma may play a key role in inducing neoplastic transformation of epithelial cells, recapitulating its role in normal mammary duct development.     

Comparative analysis of alternative and traditional immunohistochemical markers for the distinction of ovarian sertoli cell tumor from endometrioid tumors and carcinoid tumor: A study of 160 cases

The main neoplasms in the differential diagnosis for primary ovarian tumors with a tubule-rich pattern are pure Sertoli cell tumor, endometrioid tumors (including borderline tumor, well-differentiated carcinoma, and the sertoliform variant of endometrioid carcinoma), and carcinoid tumor. Because traditional immunohistochemical markers [pan-cytokeratin (pan-CK), low molecular weight cytokeratin (CK8/18), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), inhibin, calretinin, CD99, chromogranin, and synaptophysin] can occasionally have diagnostic limitations, the goal of this study was to determine whether or not any alternative markers [cytokeratin 7 (CK7), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), CD10, and CD56] have better diagnostic utility when compared with traditional markers for this differential diagnosis. Immunohistochemical stains for alternative, as well as traditional, markers were performed on the following primary ovarian tumors: pure Sertoli cell tumor (n = 40), endometrioid borderline tumor (n = 38), sertoliform endometrioid carcinoma (n = 13), well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma (n = 27), and carcinoid tumor (n = 42). Extent and intensity of immunostaining were semiquantitatively scored. In addition, immunohistochemical composite scores (ICSs) in positive cases were calculated on the basis of the combination of extent and intensity scores. Cytokeratin 7 (CK7) was positive in 97% of endometrioid tumors, 13% of Sertoli cell tumors, and 24% of carcinoid tumors. The differences in the mean ICSs for endometrioid tumors versus Sertoli cell tumor or carcinoid tumor were statistically significant (P values ranging from <0.001 to 0.018). ER and PR were positive in 87% and 86% of endometrioid tumors, 8% and 13% of Sertoli cell tumors, and 2% each of carcinoid tumors, respectively. The differences in the mean ICSs for endometrioid tumors versus Sertoli cell tumor were statistically significant (P values ranging from <0.001 to 0.012). Among the epithelial markers, EMA seemed to be the most discriminatory but only slightly better than CK7, ER, or PR. Pan-CK and CK8/18 were not helpful. CD10 showed overlapping patterns of expression in all categories of tumors. Among the sex cord markers, CD10 was markedly less useful than inhibin or calretinin; CD99 was not discriminatory. CD56 showed overlapping patterns of expression in all categories of tumors. Among the neuroendocrine markers, CD56 was less useful than chromogranin or synaptophysin. When traditional immunohistochemical markers are problematic for the differential diagnosis of ovarian Sertoli cell tumor versus endometrioid tumors versus carcinoid tumor, adding CK7, ER, and/or PR to a panel of markers can be helpful. Endometrioid tumors more frequently express CK7, ER, and PR and show a greater extent of immunostaining in contrast to Sertoli cell tumor and carcinoid tumor. Compared with traditional epithelial markers, CK7, ER, and PR are nearly as advantageous as EMA. Inhibin is the most discriminatory sex cord marker, and CD10 is not helpful in the differential diagnosis. Chromogranin and synaptophysin are excellent discriminatory markers for carcinoid tumor, and CD56 is neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific enough for this differential diagnosis to warrant its use in routine practice.     

Primary malignant fibrous histiocytoma (myxofibrosarcoma/pleomorphic sarcoma not otherwise specified) of the breast: clinicopathologic study of 19 cases

We present 19 cases of primary breast malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) or myxofibrosarcoma/pleomorphic sarcoma not otherwise specified, the largest series to date, and compare our results with those in the literature to better define MFH in this anatomical location. Twenty-seven cases (MFH, myxofibrosarcoma, or pleomorphic sarcoma not otherwise specified) were reviewed using World Health Organization and French Federation of Cancer Centers criteria. Inclusion required location within breast parenchyma without extensive chest wall involvement. Morphological features were recorded, and immunohistochemistry was applied. Clinical data were extracted from patients' medical records. Clinically, there was 1 male patient. Of 15 patients with follow-up, 5 (33% overall) died of disease within an average of 7 months after diagnosis. Distant metastases and older patient age were associated with poor survival. Storiform-pleomorphic subtype was most common (10/19) with myxofibrosarcoma (6/19) and giant cell subtype (1/19) also observed. Unique lymphocyte-rich (1/19) and pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor–like (1/19) morphologies are presented. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated expression of CD68 (71%), focal smooth muscle actin (36%), with rare focal estrogen and progesterone receptor immunoreactivity. All cases were negative for CD34, S-100 protein, desmin 33, and keratins, including CK7, CK20, CK5/6, and CK18. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma occurs as a primary lesion in breast parenchyma. Attention to morphological detail and immunohistochemistry avoids misdiagnosis. Entrapped breast ductal epithelium should not be misinterpreted as the epithelial component of a biphasic tumor. A florid lymphoid response should not be confused with metaplastic carcinoma. Pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor–like features may be observed in MFH. Our study confirms the presence of MFH in breast and presents unique morphological observations of primary breast MFH.     

Genetic abnormalities in mammary ductal intraepithelial neoplasia-flat type ("clinging ductal carcinoma in situ"): a simulator of normal mammary epithelium

BACKGROUND: Mammary ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (DIN)-flat type ("clinging ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]") generally is a subtle epithelial alteration characterized by one or a few layer(s) of atypical cells replacing the native epithelium. The "low power" appearance of DIN-flat type can be misinterpreted easily as "normal" because of the frequent absence of multilayered proliferation and often subtle cytologic atypia. Because it presents as an often unrecognized lesion or in association with tubular carcinoma, to the authors' knowledge the clinical and biologic significance of this lesion has not been well established. METHODS. Using polymerase chain reaction, the authors examined DNA extracts from microdissected areas of 22 cases with extensive "clinging DCIS," including 13 cases associated with infiltrating ductal carcinoma as well as 5 cases associated with more conventional types of DCIS. Eight polymorphic DNA markers with a high rate of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in classic types of DCIS were selected to identify possible genetic alterations on chromosomes 2p, 3p, 11q, 16q, and 17q. Two cases also were used for the assessment of clonality by means of X chromosome inactivation (methylation pattern of the human androgen receptor [HUMARA] gene). RESULTS. LOH was detected in 17 of 22 lesions (77%), and monoclonality was established in the 2 cases analyzed. The most common genetic alterations were at chromosomes 11q21-23.2, 16q23.1-24.2, and 3p14.2 with LOH in 50%, 45%, and 41%, respectively, of informative cases. The DIN-flat type showed the same genetic alterations (LOH) identified in adjacent in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma. In contrast to the DIN-flat type, the perfectly normal mammary epithelium was associated very infrequently (1 of 16 cases; 6%) with LOH. CONCLUSIONS. The DIN-flat type represents one of the earliest, morphologically recognizable, neoplastic alterations of the breast. Recognition of the DIN-flat type is important not only for the early detection of intraductal neoplasia but also to prevent misinterpretation and utilization of this lesion as a normal control in studies. This distinctive lesion could be crucial as an explanation for at least part of the > 20% reported incidence rate of breast carcinoma recurrence observed despite ostensibly "negative" margins of breast biopsies.     

Tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast: an analysis of 27 cases of a tumor with a hybrid morphology and immunoprofile

Tubulolobular carcinoma (TLC) is a rare subtype of mammary carcinoma that has eluded precise classification, exhibiting features of both ductal and lobular differentiation. The clinicopathologic features of 27 cases of TLC were analyzed by both hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical stains for E-cadherin and 34betaE12 (high molecular weight cytokeratin). Five cases of both pure tubular and classic lobular carcinoma were included as controls. Patients with TLC ranged in age from 43 to 79 years (median, 60 years). Tumor characteristics were as follows: size, 0.5 cm to 2.5 cm (median, 1.4 cm); bilaterality, 1 of 27 (4%); and multifocality, 5 of 27 (19%). Twenty-two of the 27 cases (81%) contained an in situ component: 8 (36%) lobular (LIN); 4 (18%) ductal (DIN); and 10 (46%) mixed. All 27 cases were intensely positive (3+) for E-cadherin, a feature of ductal differentiation, while 25 of 27 (93%) cases showed variable positivity for 34betaE12 (1 to 3+), a feature far more common in tumors with lobular differentiation. Clinical follow-up was available on 25 of 27 (93%) patients. Three of 24 (13%) patients developed axillary lymph node metastases and 1 of 25 (4%) patients developed a local recurrence over a follow-up period of 2 to 91 months (median, 39 months). In conclusion, TLCs are a distinct subtype of mammary carcinoma with overlapping morphologic features that are mirrored by a hybrid immunohistochemical profile. The uniform 3+ expression of E-cadherin in TLC supports the ductal differentiation of these tumors, despite a dominant lobular growth pattern. The prognosis of these tumors appears to be excellent, especially in those cases that are unilateral and less than 2 cm in size.     

Evidence that Leydig cells in Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors have a reactive rather than a neoplastic profile

BACKGROUND: Leydig cells are a variable and an inconstant feature of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLCT). Controversy exists regarding their neoplastic versus reactive nature, and their molecular biologic profile is unknown. METHODS: Six SLCT and one pure Leydig cell tumor were studied. Mitotic counts and immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 were performed in all cases. Leydig cells, neoplastic tissues, and normal nonneoplastic tissues were microdissected. DNA extracts of these samples were assessed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) by polymerase chain reaction amplification with ten polymorphic DNA markers that have shown high rates of LOH in a variety of human tumors. Three SLCT and the Leydig cell tumor were assessed for clonality by examining the DNA methylation pattern at a polymorphic site on the androgen receptor gene. RESULTS: Leydig cells in SLCT had a low mitotic count (0-1/50 high-power fields [HPF]) compared with the neoplastic stroma (median, 40/50 HPF). Ki-67 was positive in < 2% of Leydig cells in all SLCT, compared with a median of 7% in the neoplastic stroma. Clonality analysis confirmed the monoclonality of the neoplastic cells in the Leydig cell tumor. However, the Leydig cells from three SLCT were polyclonal, whereas the monoclonal nature of the neoplastic Sertoli tubules was confirmed in one of these cases and that of mucinous heterologous elements in another case. The Leydig cell tumor showed LOH at four of the eight loci evaluated. Leydig cells from five SLCT were evaluated: one showed LOH at one locus, two showed LOH at two loci, and the remaining two showed no LOH. CONCLUSIONS: The demonstration that Leydig cells from SLCT are polyclonal strongly suggests that they are nonneoplastic in nature. This is supported by a low proliferation fraction and a lower fraction of LOH compared with the truly neoplastic Leydig cells.