儿童肥胖症机理与少儿推拿综合调理

儿童单纯性肥胖症是以儿童过度营养、运动不足和行为异常为特征的全身脂肪组织过度增生性疾病,不仅影响少儿身心健康,还为成年后多种疾病埋下隐患。单纯性肥胖已成为21世纪威胁儿童健康的头号杀手,也是人们关注的严重公共卫生问题之一。通过中西医对儿童肥胖症机理的不同认识,特别是中医对儿童肥胖症的病因病机进行分析,提出儿童肥胖症的治疗要根据肥胖症患儿临床表现辨证施术,以少儿推拿为主的综合治疗调理方法,配合中药、针灸、拔罐、刮痧等疏通经脉、调和气血、平衡阴阳,调整脏腑功能,辅助心理治疗及行为矫正,在瘦身、强身的同时亦关注少儿心理健康。     

推拿手法安全性的研究进展

中医推拿疗法是一种传统的、有效的理疗方法。在临床实践中具有独特的优势。它可以弥补许多疾病和损伤的药物治疗的不足,具有不可替代的疗效。推拿是部位和手法的综合作用,意外事件的发生主要是因为有的医者求效心切,不关注治疗部位和手法,疗效不明显,而且增加了患者的痛苦并危及患者的健康。本文试从施术部位和手法的不同,分析推拿操作中的意外事件,总结产生损伤的原因,并厘清操作要点,以期指导临床推拿操作的安全实施。     

按法对大鼠脑卒中后肌痉挛的影响及其机理研究

目的:观察按法干预后脑卒中后肌痉挛大鼠血浆及脊髓L1-L3节段灰质前角组织中γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)和甘氛酸(Gly)含量的变化,探讨按法缓解脑卒中后肌痉挛的作用机制。方法:健康成年雄性Sprague-DawIey(SD)大鼠80只,随机抽取10只为空白组,其余70只造模。采用左颈外动脉插入线栓法建立大鼠大脑中动脉局灶性脑缺血(MCAO)模型。Longa神经功能评定为2-3分,且改良Ashworth肌张力评分评定为;1+、1+及2级的30只大鼠纳入实验。用随机数字表法将30只造模成功的大鼠随机分为模型组、按肌腱组和按肌腹组。造模成功2 d后,按肌腱组及按肌腹组大鼠分别接受大鼠按法橾作治疗仪按股四头肌肌腱和按股四头肌肌腹治疗,压力控制在(350±50)g,按压频率为5s/次,每次15 min,每日1次,连续治疗5d。各组于治疗第5次后,采用改良Ashworth#挛评定标准对大鼠股四头肌的张力进行评定。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)法观察大鼠血浆及脊髓L1-L3节段中Gly的含量变化,采用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)观察大鼠血浆及脊髓L1-L3节段中GABA的含量变化。结果:各组改良Ashworth量表肌张力评定中,按肌腱组大鼠肌张力下降较按肌腹组更为明显(P<0.01);按肌腱组血浆及香髓L1-L3节段组织中Gly及GABA的含量增加较按肌腹组更为明显(均P<0.01)。结论:基于腱器官“反牵张反射”理论,采用按法刺激腱器官诱发“反牵张反射”对大鼠肌痉挛状态的改善效果优于按压肌腹。大鼠血浆和脊髓L1-L3节段中Gly和GABA含量的增加,可能是按法刺激腱器官改善大鼠肌痉挛状态的作用机制之一。     

BOPPPS教学模型在推拿学教学中的实践和探索——以[扌衮]法实训为例

BOPPPS教学模型是以建构主义和交际法为理论依据的教学设计模型,学生积极的参与式互动和教师的及时评价反馈,促成高效的课程教学。本次研究以推拿学中的代表性手法——[扌衮]法实训教学为例,探讨BOPPPS教学模型在推拿学课程的有效构建,使学生能更好地掌握[扌衮]法的理论和实践操作,进一步优化推拿学的教学设计。     

降黄散熏蒸联合捏脊、推拿治疗湿热蕴蒸型新生儿病理性黄疸临床研究

目的:观察降黄散熏蒸联合捏脊、推拿治疗湿热蕴蒸型新生儿病理性黄疸的临床疗效。方法:将92例湿热蕴蒸型病理性黄疸患儿按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各46例。对照组给予蓝光照射治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加降黄散熏蒸联合捏脊、推拿治疗,2组均治疗5 d。对比2组临床疗效和治疗前后的血清总胆红素水平、免疫球蛋白(Ig)及T细胞亚群的变化,记录黄疸消退时间。结果:观察组临床疗效优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,2组血清总胆红素水平均较治疗前下降(P<0.05),观察组血清总胆红素水平比对照组下降更明显(P<0.05);观察组黄疸消退时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,2组血清IgA、IgG、IgM水平均较治疗前升高(P<0.05),观察组IgA、IgG、IgM水平均比对照组升高更明显(P<0.05)。治疗后,2组CD3^+、CD4^+、CD4^+/CD8^+值均较治疗前升高(P<0.05),观察组CD3^+、CD4^+、CD4^+/CD8^+值均比对照组升高更明显(P<0.05)。结论:降黄散熏蒸联合捏脊、推拿治疗湿热蕴蒸型新生儿病理性黄疸,可以有效降低患儿的血清总胆红素水平,缩短退黄时间,提高机体免疫功能。     

经筋手法结合改良小角度矢状位扳法治疗寰枢关节半脱位40例的临床疗效观察

目的：探讨对寰枢关节半脱位采用经筋手法结合改良小角度矢状位扳法与常规推拿疗法治疗的临床疗效观察,为临床治疗该病症提供参考。方法：对80例寰枢关节半脱位患者随机分组,观察两组的治愈率、好转率和治疗前后影像学寰齿间隙差值等指标,并统计结果。结果：治疗组治愈率为70.00%,对照组为42.50%,治疗组总有效率为97.472%,对照组为82.50%,两组经χ2 检验差异有显著性;治疗前后影像学寰齿前间隙及齿状突侧间隙差值比较（P＜0.05）,差异有统计学意义。结论：经筋手法结合改良小角度矢状位扳法治疗寰枢关节半脱位疗效优于常规推拿疗法,本法值得临床进一步推广。     

推拿配合整脊手法治疗颈型类冠心病30例

目的观察推拿配合颈椎整脊手法治疗颈型类冠心病的临床疗效。方法试验组采用推拿配合颈椎整脊手法调整,对照组采用传统推拿手法,1个疗程后比较临床疗效、症状、体征积分及颈椎生理曲度。结果 2组治疗后,试验组总有效率90.0%,对照组总有效率66.67%,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05);症状、体征积分比较、颈椎生理曲度比较均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论推拿手法配合颈椎整脊手法治疗颈型类冠心病优于单纯推拿手法。     

On English translation of infant Tuina points in traditional Chinese medicine

1 Introduction In recent years,several international standardized traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) nomenclatures have been published,including the major ones A Proposed Standard International Acupuncture Nomenclature by World Health Organization (WHO) in 1991[1],International Standard Terminologies on Traditional Medicine in the Western Pacific Region[2] by WHO in the Western Pacific Region (WPRO) in 2007 and International Standard Chinese-English Basic Nomenclature of Chinese Medicine[3] by the World Federation of Chinese Medicine Societies (WFCMS) in 2007.However,an English translation of points applied in infant Tuina therapy is neither contained in any of these standardized nomenclatures,nor in major Chinese-English dictionaries of Chinese medicine[4-6].Infant Tuina is an effective and common therapy used in the pediatric department of Chinese medicine.As the points used in infant Tuina therapy are different from the points used in standard acupuncture,and are essential to practice,the authors believe it is important to make an English translation of infant Tuina points and explore the principles and protocol of their translation.     

推拿局部镇痛机制的概述

既往对推拿镇痛的研究多集中在脊髓或中枢水平对疼痛的调制方面,而中医经筋疾病的治疗原则是"以痛为腧",在患者的局部给予推拿治疗后,其疼痛往往能够得到减轻或消除,而其局部的某些物质究竟发生了如何的变化值得研究者进行观察,本研究就是探讨推拿手法与局部镇痛物质和致痛物质之间的关系,为中医"以痛为腧"的理论提供客观的依据。     

A systematic review of Tuina for irritable bowel syndrome: Recommendations for future trials

ObjectivesThis systematic review assessed whether Tuina (therapeutic massage) is more effective and safer than no treatment or routine medical treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).MethodsEleven databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of IBS diagnosed based on Manning or Rome criteria. Tuina with or without routine treatments (RTs) was tested against RTs. The Cochrane risk of bias was evaluated for each trial. RevMan 5.3 was used to conduct a meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 8 trials (5 IBS-diarrhea and 3 IBS-constipation) with 545 participants using 8 different manipulations were included. All trials were published in Chinese. For overall symptom improving rate (> 30 % improvement in overall symptom scores), it had not been shown that Tuina was significantly better than RTs (RR 1.23, 95 % CI 0.94–1.60, 197 participants, 3 studies, I² = 65 %) for IBS-diarrhea, and Tuina combined with RTs showed more benefit than RTs alone (RR 1.29, 95 % CI 1.08–1.54, 115 participants, 3 studies) for IBS-diarrhea. All trials did not report adverse effect in relation to Tuina. Risk of bias was generally unclear across all domains.ConclusionsTuina combined with RTs may be superior to RTs for improving overall symptom of IBS-diarrhea. Due to the existing methodological issues and the heterogeneity of Tuina manipulation, current findings need to be confirmed in large scale, multicenter, and robust randomized trials (especially on outcome assessing blinding and allocation concealment).