“317护”宣教平台联合肠道准备评估单在结肠镜检查前的应用

目的评价“317护”宣教平台联合肠道准备评估单在肠镜检查前的应用效果。方法选取2020年10月-2021年1月我科行结肠镜检查的住院患者120例为研究对象。根据住院时间分为观察组和对照组,各60例。观察组实施“317护”宣教平台联合肠道准备评估单进行肠道准备,对照组使用肠道准备评估单进行肠道准备。比较两组肠道清洁度、肠道清洁剂服用方法正确率、肠道准备满意度。结果观察组肠道清洁度评分、肠道清洁剂服用方法正确率及肠道准备满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论应用“317护”宣教平台联合肠道准备评估单在肠镜检查前进行健康宣教后,提高了患者肠道清洁度、肠道清洁剂服用方法正确率及肠道准备满意度。     

高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定雷公藤制剂中5种有效成分的含量

目的:建立高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定雷公藤制剂中雷公藤甲素、雷公藤内酯酮、雷公藤晋碱、雷公藤次碱和雷公藤红素的含量。方法:采用电喷雾正电离模式和多反应监测模式。雷公藤甲素、雷公藤内酯酮、雷公藤晋碱和雷公藤次碱含量测定,以含5 mmol·L^-1碳酸氢铵的水溶液和纯甲醇作为流动相,采用梯度洗脱方式在ACE UltraCore SuperPhenylHexyl(2.1 mm×50.0 mm,5 μm)色谱柱上进行分离。雷公藤红素含量测定,以含0.5%甲酸的水溶液和含0.1%甲酸的乙腈作为流动相,采用等度洗脱在ACE Excel C₁₈-AR(2.1 mm×50.0 mm,5 μm)色谱柱上进行分离。结果:雷公藤甲素、雷公藤内酯酮、雷公藤晋碱、雷公藤次碱和雷公藤红素分别在2.4~1 200,2.0~1 000,80~40 000,80~40 000和10~5 000 ng·mL^-1范围内线性关系良好,平均加样回收率分别为 94.56%,102.36%,93.27%,95.67%和99.82%,RSD均低于5.13%。结论:本方法运行时间短,灵敏度高,精密度和重复性好,适用于雷公藤制剂中雷公藤甲素、雷公藤内酯酮、雷公藤晋碱、雷公藤次碱和雷公藤红素5种活性成分定量检测,可为雷公藤制剂多指标质量控制提供实验依据。     

Factors affecting community pharmacist work: A scoping review and thematic synthesis using role theory

Many community pharmacists ideologically support recent changes to their roles in primary healthcare. However, their antithetical resistance towards practice change could have systemic causes (i.e. role stresses), which may account for increased job dissatisfaction, burnout, and job turnover in the profession. Deeper comprehension was sought using a role theory framework.ObjectiveTo identify factors leading to role stresses and strain responses for community pharmacists, and to create a framework for community pharmacist role management.MethodPubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched for qualitative studies identifying community pharmacist role stress and strain using scoping review methodology from 1990 to 2019. Content and thematic analysis using the framework method was performed, and themes were reported using thematic synthesis.ResultsScreening of 10,880 records resulted in 33 studies identified, with 41 factors categorised into four domains: Interpersonal Interactions, Social Setting, Individual Attributes, and Extra-Role. All role stresses were present. Reported role strains suggest role system imbalance.ConclusionCommunity pharmacists are in a multifactorial transitional environment. Reported role stresses may be a function of past pharmacist roles and increased role expectations, amplified by many requisite interactions and individual pharmacist characteristics. Social science theories were found to be applicable to the community pharmacy setting.     

基于数据挖掘对治疗口疮的成方制剂的用药规律分析*

目的分析治疗口疮的成方制剂的剂型、功能主治、组方用药规律及核心组合，为临床治疗口疮的辨证用药及新药研发提供参考。方法 收集《中华人民共和国卫生部药品标准·中药成方制剂》(以下简称《中药成方制剂》)、《中华人民共和国药典：2015年版》(以下简称2015年版《中国药典》)中治疗口疮的成方制剂的名称、处方、剂型、功能与主治，录入Microsoft Excel及中医传承辅助平台(V2.5)，统计用药频次；运用Apriori算法及关联规则对处方核心组合进行统计分析(支持度为10%，置信度100%)；采用熵聚类算法统计2-3个不同成分间的关联系数(支持度为8，惩罚度为2)；根据无监督的熵层次聚类法提取内在核心组合和新方组合。结果 挖掘得出86种成方制剂及其处方，以丸剂、散剂、片剂等多见，包含药物148味，使用频次较高为冰片、甘草、大黄、黄芩等，药物四气五味以苦寒为主，主要归肺胃心脾经，治疗证型较多为热毒炽盛证、热毒攻喉证等，常用核心配伍包括“黄芩-大黄”“黄连-甘草”等，挖掘得出新方组合“珍珠-川贝母-灯心草-天花粉-没药”等4首。结论 利用数据挖掘分析治疗口疮的成方制剂的组方规律，由核心药物组合成新方，可为临床辨证使用及研发治疗口疮成方制剂、新药提供依据和参考。     

利用聚多巴胺制备丹参注射液缓释制剂的研究

目的:利用聚多巴胺(PDA)对丹参注射液中多成分进行负载,构建丹参注射液(SMI)缓释制剂(PDA-SMI)。方法:建立丹参注射液的原儿茶醛、迷迭香酸和丹酚酸B3种成分的分析方法并进行含量测定;制备PDA,在pH值2.5的条件下对SMI进行负载,制备PDA-SMI;对PDA-SMI体外释放行为进行考察。结果:SMI中原儿茶醛、迷迭香酸、丹酚酸B的浓度分别为0.344、0.214、0.262 mg/mL;PDA-SMI对原儿茶醛、迷迭香酸、丹酚酸B的载药量分别为8.59%,15.90%和20.57%;PDA-SMI中原儿茶醛、迷迭香酸、丹酚酸B体外累计释放率分别为84.05%,77.57%和63.12%。结论:PDA可以负载SMI的多种成分,载药量较高,并具有良好的缓释效应。     

Posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice and longitudinal analysis of the effect of routine laboratory measurements on posaconazole concentrations

Posaconazole is indicated for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of posaconazole is used to optimise drug exposure. The aim of this study was to analyse and describe the TDM practices and exposure of posaconazole tablets. Patients who received posaconazole for treatment or prophylaxis of fungal infections were included in the study. The following therapeutic window was defined: if concentration was low (<0.7 mg/L for prophylaxis or < 1.5 mg/L for treatment) or high (>3.75 mg/L), the hospital pharmacist provided the physician with dosage advice, which implementation to patient care was analysed. A longitudinal analysis was performed to analyse if different confounding variables had an effect on posaconazole concentrations. Forty‐seven patients were enrolled resulting in 217 posaconazole trough concentrations. A median of 3 (IQR 1‐7) samples was measured per patient. The median concentration was 1.7 mg/L (IQR 0.8‐2.7) for prophylaxis and 1.76 mg/L (IQR 1.3‐2.3) for treatment. Overall, 78 posaconazole concentrations were out of the therapeutic window. For 45 (54%) of these concentrations, a dosage change was recommended. In the longitudinal analysis, the laboratory markers and patient baseline variables did not have an effect on posaconazole concentrations. Adequate posaconazole exposure was shown in 64% (affected 28 patients) of the measured concentrations. TDM practice of posaconazole can be improved by increasing the implementation rate of dose recommendation by a multidisciplinary antifungal stewardship team.