Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Proposed Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar MSB11455 Versus the Reference Pegfilgrastim Neulasta in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized,Double-blind Trial

PurposeMSB11455 is a proposed biosimilar to the reference pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®). This pivotal equivalence study (NCT03251248) assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of MSB11455 to the reference product.MethodsThis 2-way, 2-sequence, group-sequential, crossover study was conducted in healthy subjects. Subjects received a single subcutaneous dose of MSB11455 or the reference product (both 6 mg/0.6 mL) on Day 1 of each study period. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (absolute neutrophil count; ANC) samples were taken predose and up to day 16 post-dose. Non-compartmental parameters were calculated. Immunogenicity samples were taken pre-dose and up to day 84 after the first dose. Safety was assessed throughout the study.FindingsA total of 292 subjects were randomized to therapy and treated; 244 received both treatments. For all primary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, 90% repeated confidence intervals of geometric means ratio of MSB11455 to the reference product were within the pre-defined equivalence range (80.00%–125.00%) for AUC_0-∞ (96.59–112.82); AUC_0–last (97.29–113.96), C_max (97.13–114.99), maximum observed effect on ANC (98.74–102.39), and area under the effect–time curve from time zero to time to last quantifiable concentration (97.30–100.23). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were comparable between treatments. No filgrastim-specific neutralizing antibodies were detected with either treatment sequence.ImplicationsPharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of MSB11455 and the reference product was shown, with comparable immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability between treatments. The study supports the biosimilarity of MSB11455 to the reference product. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03251248.     

基于药动学与药效学相关联的养阴通脑颗粒主要有效部位正交配伍研究

目的探讨养阴通脑颗粒主要有效部位(总生物碱、总黄酮、总皂苷、总酚酸)配伍后在脑缺血再灌注模型大鼠体内药物浓度及其药动学与药效学变化。方法采用正交试验法组成上述主要有效部位用量配比不同的9个组方,供脑缺血再灌注模型大鼠ig给药,高效液相色谱-二极管阵列检测器(HPLC-DAD)测定不同时间点血浆中的葛根素、阿魏酸和川芎嗪血浆药物浓度。DAS 3.2.6软件以非房室模型拟合药动学参数,并运用总量统计矩法和综合评分法对整体药动学特征进行评价。同时采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法测定大鼠血浆中超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)的含量。最后进行药动学-药效学(PK-PD)模型研究,获得各药物浓度与药效之间的定量方程。结果葛根素、阿魏酸和川芎嗪在模型大鼠体内的药动学特征有所差异。总量统计矩和综合评分研究表明不同配伍对总量零阶矩、总量平均滞留时间、综合评分等参数影响不一。主要有效部位正交配伍给药后,一定程度上会抑制脑缺血再灌注大鼠血浆中SOD和CAT的降低。各PK-PD模型均采用Sigmoid-Emax模型,拟合结果与实测数据之间相关性良好,R值均大于0.85。结论养阴通脑颗粒主要有效部位配伍对模型大鼠体内的药动学行为和抗氧化指标具有一定影响;中药复方多成分药物代谢动力学可采用总量统计矩和综合评分法进行研究;PK-PD结合模型可用于中药复方多成分药动学与药效学之间相关性的评价与预测。     

Design,synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4-(3-chloro-4-(3-cyclopropylthioureido)-2-fluorophenoxy)-7-methoxyquinoline-6-carboxamide (WXFL-152): a novel triple angiokinase inhibitor for cancer therapy

Angiokinases, such as vascular endothelial-, fibroblast- and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (VEGFRs, FGFRs and PDGFRs) play crucial roles in tumor angiogenesis. Anti-angiogenesis therapy using multi-angiokinase inhibitor has achieved great success in recent years. In this study, we presented the design, synthesis, target identification, molecular mechanism, pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) research of a novel triple-angiokinase inhibitor WXFL-152. WXFL-152, identified from a series of 4-oxyquinoline derivatives based on a structure–activity relationship study, inhibited the proliferation of vascular endothelial cells (ECs) and pericytes by blocking the angiokinase signals VEGF/VEGFR2, FGF/FGFRs and PDGF/PDGFRβ simultaneously in vitro. Significant anticancer effects of WXFL-152 were confirmed in multiple preclinical tumor xenograft models, including a patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) model. Pharmacokinetic studies of WXFL-152 demonstrated high favourable bioavailability with single-dose and continuous multi-dose by oral administration in rats and beagles. In conclusion, WXFL-152, which is currently in phase Ib clinical trials, is a novel and effective triple-angiokinase inhibitor with clear PD and PK in tumor therapy.     

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiling of imipenem in patients admitted to an intensive care unit in India: A nonrandomized,cross-sectional,analytical, open-labeled study

Results:The difference in the plasma imipenem concentration between the gastrointestinal and the nongastrointestinal groups was significant at 2 h (P = 0.015) following drug dosing; while the difference was significant between the skin/cellulitis and nonskin/cellulitus groups at 2 h (P = 0.008), after drug dosing. The imipenem levels were above the MIC and 5 times the MIC for the isolated organism in 96.67% and 50% of the patients, respectively.Conclusions:The pharmacokinetic profile of imipenem does not vary according to the locus of an infection in critically ill patients. Imipenem, 3 g/day intermittent dosing, maintains a plasma concentration which is adequate to treat most infections encountered in patients admitted to an ICU. However, a change in the dosing regimen is suggested for patients infected with organisms having MIC values above 4 mg/L.     

Understanding the Influence of Nanocarrier-Mediated Brain Delivery on Therapeutic Performance Through Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling

This study aimed at evaluating how encapsulation in a regular nanocarrier (NC) (providing extended circulation time) or in a brain-targeting NC (providing prolonged circulation time and increased brain uptake) may influence the therapeutic index compared with the unformulated drug and to explore the key parameters affecting therapeutic performance using a model-based approach. Pharmacokinetic (PK) models were built with chosen PK parameters. For a scenario where central effect depends on area under the unbound brain concentration curve and peripheral toxicity relates to peak unbound plasma concentration, dose-effect and drug-side effect curves were constructed, and the therapeutic index was evaluated. Regular NC improved the therapeutic index compared with the unformulated drug due to reduced peripheral toxicity, while brain-targeting NC enhanced the therapeutic index by lowering peripheral toxicity and increasing central effect. Decreasing drug release rate or systemic clearance of NC with drug still encapsulated could increase the therapeutic index. Also, a drug with shorter half-life would therapeutically benefit more from a NC encapsulation. This work provides insights into how a NC for brain delivery should be optimized to maximize the therapeutic performance and is helpful to predict if and to what extent a drug with certain PK properties would obtain therapeutic benefit from nanoencapsulation.     

Pharmacogenetics of immunosuppressant drugs: A new aspect for individualized therapy

In recent years, pharmacogenetics has emerged as an important tool for choosing the right immunosuppressant drug and its appropriate dose. Indeed, pharmacogenetics may exert its action on immunosuppressant drugs at three levels. Pharmacogenetics identifies and studies the genes involved in encoding the proteins involved in drug pharmacokinetics and in encoding the enzymes involved in drug degradation. Pharmacogenetics is also relevant in encoding the enzymes and proteins involved in codifying the transmembrane proteins involved in transmembrane passage favoring the absorption and intracellular action of several immunosuppressants. Pharmacogenetics concern the variability of genes encoding the proteins involved as immunosuppressant triggers in the pharmacodynamic pathways. Of course, not all genes have been discovered and studied, but some of them have been clearly examined and their relevance together with other factors such as age and race has been defined. Other genes on the basis of relevant studies have been proposed as good candidates for future studies. Unfortunately, to date, clear conclusions may be drawn only for those drugs that are metabolized by CYP3A5 and its genotyping before kidney, heart and lung transplantation is recommended. The conclusions of the studies on the recommended candidate genes, together with the development of omics techniques could in the future allow us to choose the right dose of the right immunosuppressant for the right patient.     

Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents III: The 2023 Geneva revision

The set of guidelines for good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents was developed following an international consensus conference in Copenhagen in 1996 (Viby-Mogensen et al., Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996, 40 , 59–74); the guidelines were later revised and updated following the second consensus conference in Stockholm in 2005 (Fuchs-Buder et al., Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51 , 789–808). In view of new devices and further development of monitoring technologies that emerged since then, (e.g., electromyography, three-dimensional acceleromyography, kinemyography) as well as novel compounds (e.g., sugammadex) a review and update of these recommendations became necessary. The intent of these revised guidelines is to continue to help clinical researchers to conduct high-quality work and advance the field by enhancing the standards, consistency, and comparability of clinical studies. There is growing awareness of the importance of consensus-based reporting standards in clinical trials and observational studies. Such global initiatives are necessary in order to minimize heterogeneous and inadequate data reporting and to improve clarity and comparability between different studies and study cohorts. Variations in definitions of endpoints or outcome variables can introduce confusion and difficulties in interpretation of data, but more importantly, it may preclude building of an adequate body of evidence to achieve reliable conclusions and recommendations. Clinical research in neuromuscular pharmacology and physiology is no exception.