导引功法结合腹部按摩预防亚健康人群向慢性疲劳综合征转化的临床研究

摘要：目的 观察导引功法结合腹部按摩预防亚健康人群向慢性疲劳综合征转归的临床疗效。方法 将纳入研究的144例患者随机分成观察组（n=72）和对照组（n=72），两组患者均给予标准化的健康教育干预，在此基础上观察组运用导引功法结合腹部按摩干预，2组疗程均为12周，分别在干预前、干预后采用疲劳评定量表（FSS）、中医症候积分量表及生活质量量表（SF-36）进行评价。结果 两组各随机选完成研究的36例进行组内比较：两组均较干预前显著改善，有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；组间比较：干预后，观察组疲劳评定总分和中医症候积分显著低于对照组，生活质量评分高于对照组，均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 导引功法结合腹部按摩预防亚健康人群向慢性疲劳综合征转归效果明显，能有效摆脱疲劳状态，提高生活质量，值得临床推广应用。     

«Omepralith»: un modelo de simulación novedoso para el entrenamiento en sialoendoscopia

IntroductionThere are no previously described training models for learning or teaching how to remove lithiasis from the salivary ducts. Therefore, we present a new simulation model to enable us to faithfully represent the process of endoscopic lithiasis extraction by sialoendoscopy.Materials and methodsA simulation model was developed using a pig's head, omeprazole spheres were used to simulate lithiasis in the various ducts of each salivary gland and a Dormia basket was used to train in extraction of the lithiasis model.ResultsTwenty-seven residents in training and/or young specialists were successfully trained in this technique using this model. Twenty-six (96.3%) considered the model useful for training in the use of baskets; all of them were able to capture the omeprazole sphere in the salivary duct. A satisfaction rate of 92.25 out of 100 points was obtained through an anonymous survey.ConclusionWe describe a novel simulation model using omeprazole spheres, which allows the surgeon to practice how to diagnose and treat obstructive pathology of the salivary glands in a risk-free environment guaranteeing the reproducibility of the technique in conditions similar to those of normal practice.     

The effect of massage therapy on pain after surgery: A comprehensive meta-analysis

BackgroundFindings on the usefulness of massage therapy (MT) in postoperative pain management are often inconsistent among studies.ObjectivesThis study’s aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to clarify the effects of massage therapy in the treatment of postoperative pain.MethodsThree databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for RCTs published from database inception through January 26, 2021. The primary outcome was pain relief. The quality of RCTs was appraised with the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. The random-effect model was used to calculate the effect sizes and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidential intervals (CIs) as a summary effect. The heterogeneity test was conducted through I². Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Possible publication bias was assessed using visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry.ResultsThe analysis included 33 RCTs and showed that MT is effective in reducing postoperative pain (SMD, −1.32; 95 % CI, −2.01 to −0.63; p = 0.0002; I² = 98.67 %). A similar significant effect was found for both short (immediate assessment) and long terms (assessment performed 4–6 weeks after the MT). Remarkably, we found neither the duration per session nor the dose had an impact on the effect of MT and there seemed to be no difference in the effects of different MT types. In addition, MT seemed to be more effective for adults. Furthermore, MT had better analgesic effects on cesarean section and heart surgery than orthopedic surgery.LimitationsPublication bias is possible due to the inclusion of studies in English only. Additionally, the included studies were extremely heterogeneous. Double-blind research on MT is difficult to implement, and none of the included studies is double-blind. There was some heterogeneity and publication bias in the included studies. In addition, there is no uniform evaluation standard for the operation level of massage practitioners, which may lead to research implementation bias.ConclusionsMT is effective in reducing postoperative pain in both short and long terms.     

点穴推拿治疗颈源性失眠临床研究

目的:观察点穴推拿治疗颈源性失眠的临床疗效。方法:将100例颈源性失眠患者按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组50例。对照组给予艾司唑仑片治疗,观察组给予点穴推拿治疗,2组均连续治疗10 d。对比2组临床疗效和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)。结果:观察组总有效率94.00%,高于对照组的72.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,2组PSQI各项细则评分及总分均较治疗前降低,观察组PSQI各项细则评分及总分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:点穴推拿治疗颈源性失眠疗效优于艾司唑仑片。     

不同直腿抬高扳腿法对推拿治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效的影响

目的探讨不同直腿抬高扳腿法对推拿治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效的影响。方法选择2018年5月—2019年1月在广西中医药大学第一附属医院推拿科治疗的腰椎间盘突出症患者100例,随机分为对照组与观察组各50例。2组均采用相同的松解类推拿手法治疗,治疗过程中观察组采用改进的直腿抬高扳腿法,对照组采用常规的直腿抬高扳腿法。2组均以治疗6次为1个疗程,疗程之间间隔1 d,共治疗4个疗程。观察2组治疗效果及治疗前后患侧直腿抬高角度、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)、日本骨科学会腰椎功能量表评分(JOA评分)变化和治疗过程中可能发生的不良反应。结果观察组与对照组愈显率分别为74%(37/50)、54%(27/50),总有效率分别为96%(48/50)、94%(47/50),观察组愈显率明显高于对照组(P<0.05),2组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与治疗前比较,治疗后2组患者患侧直腿抬高角度均显著增大(P均<0.05),VAS评分均显著降低(P均<0.05),JOA评分均显著升高(P均<0.05);治疗后2组比较,观察组患侧直腿抬高角度显著大于对照组(P<0.05),VAS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05),JOA评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者均未出现疼痛症状加重等手法反应,对照组有7例患者出现不同程度的腰臀疼痛症状加重。结论在采用推拿手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症时,改进的直腿抬高扳腿法较常规的直腿抬高扳腿法疗效更为显著,可能发生的不良反应更少。     

耳穴贴压联合涌泉穴按摩对老年原发性高血压患者血压变异性的影响

目的:探讨耳穴贴压联合涌泉穴按摩治疗老年原发性高血压的效果及对患者血压变异性(BPV)的影响。方法:将94例老年原发性高血压患者随机分为对照组(n=47)和观察组(n=47)。常规西医治疗基础上,观察组给予王不留行籽耳穴贴压联合涌泉穴按摩治疗。比较两组治疗前后收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)水平、SBP/DBP下降幅度并评估降压疗效,BPV根据24 h动态血压监测结果评估,计算两组治疗前后24h SBP标准差(24h SBP)、24h DBP标准差(24h DBP)、白天SBP标准差(dSSD)、白天DBP标准差(dDSD)、夜间SBP标准差(nSSD)和夜间DBP标准差(nDSD),记录两组治疗期间不良反应情况。结果:观察组治疗后SBP、DBP水平和下降幅度均优于对照组(P<0.05); 观察组降压总有效率97.87%明显高于对照组82.98%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 对照组治疗后24h SBP、24h DSD、dSSD、dDSD较治疗前有明显下降(P<0.05),观察组治疗后24h SBP、24h DSD、dSSD、dDSD、nSSD显著低于治疗前(P<0.05),观察组治疗后24h SBP、24h DSD、dSSD均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 两组不良反应以头晕、头痛、恶心和眩晕为主,症状程度均较轻,患者耐受性好,组间不良反应率比较差异均无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:常规西医治疗基础上给予中医耳穴贴压联合涌泉穴按摩,不仅能有效降低老年原发性高血压患者血压水平和增益降压疗效,而且能显著降低BPV。