Coumadin (R/S-warfarin) metabolism plays a critical role in patient response to anticoagulant therapy. Several cytochrome P450s oxidize warfarin into R/S-6-, 7-, 8-, 10, and 4′-hydroxywarfarin that can undergo subsequent glucuronidation by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs); however, current studies on recombinant UGTs cannot be adequately extrapolated to microsomal glucuronidation capacities for the liver.
Herein, we estimated the capacity of the average human liver to glucuronidate hydroxywarfarin and identified UGTs responsible for those metabolic reactions through inhibitor phenotyping. There was no observable activity toward R/S-warfarin, R/S-10-hydroxywarfarin or R/S-4′-hydroxywarfarin.
The observed metabolic efficiencies (Vmax/Km) toward R/S-6-, 7-, and especially 8-hydroxywarfarin indicated a high glucuronidation capacity to metabolize these compounds.
UGTs demonstrated strong regioselectivity toward the hydroxywarfarins. UGT1A6 and UGT1A1 played a major role in R/S-6- and 7-hydroxywarfarin glucuronidation, respectively, whereas UGT1A9 accounted for almost all of the generation of the R/S-8-hydroxywarfarin glucuronide.
In summary, these studies expanded insights to glucuronidation of hydroxywarfarins by pooled human liver microsomes, novel roles for UGT1A6 and 1A9, and the overall degree of regioselectivity for the UGT reactions.
Patients with cancer, particularly those with metastatic cancer, are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which places a huge burden on healthcare resources and can adversely affect patients' prognosis. In addition, VTE can have a negative impact on quality of life and increase the management challenges faced by physicians and nurses. Conventional long-term treatment using vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, presents many practical problems for cancer patients including frequent monitoring and dose adjustment, drug interactions, and disruption of anticoagulation for invasive procedures. The aim of this article is to review the potential advantages of using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of cancer-related VTE in comparison to conventional therapy with warfarin or standard heparin. The potential advantages were determined via a literature review. LMWH is at least as effective as standard heparin or warfarin, and has been shown to have several benefits over warfarin in cancer patients. The simplicity of this therapy enables patients to be treated at home, and has been shown to have a positive impact on overall quality of life. The use of LMWH provides a treatment alternative to patients with cancer offering them hope and optimism regarding their care. 相似文献
Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with almost 300,000 deaths per year in the United States. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) offer an alternative to warfarin-based therapy without monitoring requirements and with fewer drug and food interactions. Edoxaban, a direct Xa inhibitor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), based upon results of the Hokusai-VTE Phase 3 trial. The trial demonstrated that edoxaban administered once daily after initial treatment with heparin was non-inferior in reducing the risk of VTE recurrence and caused significantly less major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding compared to warfarin. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of adults with VTE. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was developed using patient-level data from the Hokusai-VTE trial, clinical event costs from real-world databases, and drug acquisition costs for warfarin of $0.36 and edoxaban of $9.24 per tablet. Results: From a U.S. health-care delivery system perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $22,057 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that edoxaban had an ICER <$50,000 per QALY gained relative to warfarin in 67% of model simulations. The result was robust to variation in key model parameters including the cost and disutility of warfarin monitoring. Conclusion: Despite its higher drug acquisition cost, edoxaban is a cost-effective alternative to warfarin for the treatment of VTE. 相似文献