The impact of age and sex on the reporting of cough and angioedema with renin–angiotensin system inhibitors: a case/noncase study in VigiBase

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of age and sex on the reporting of cough and angioedema related to renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors. A case/noncase study was performed in VigiBase. Two case groups were identified, reports of cough and reports of angioedema, and noncases were all reports of all other adverse events. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between reporting of cough and angioedema with each class of RAS inhibitors stratified by age/sex and to control for confounding. The reporting of cough with angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors was significantly higher in women than in men [adjusted reporting odds ratio (ROR): 44.0, 95% CI (43.2–44.8) for women vs. 29.2, 95% CI (28.5–29.9) for men]. There was no difference in reporting of cough linked to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and aliskiren between men and women. In contrast, the reporting of angioedema with ACE inhibitors and ARBs was significantly higher in men than in women, but for aliskiren, women had a significantly higher ROR than men [adjusted ROR: 5.20, 95% CI (4.18–6.46) for women vs. 3.04, 95% CI (2.30–4.02) for men]. The reporting of cough with ACE inhibitors was increased with age until reaching a plateau at middle adulthood (40–59 years) and the reporting of angioedema with ACE inhibitors was increased with age until elderly (60–79 years). Age had only a slight effect on the reporting of cough and angioedema with ARBs and aliskiren. Both age and sex have substantial effects on the reporting of cough and angioedema with RAS inhibitors and in particular ACE inhibitors. Further study is needed to determine whether these differences mainly express different adverse drug reaction risks in subgroups or also can be explained by factors influencing reporting.     

Adverse drug reactions of statins in children and adolescents: a descriptive analysis from VigiBase,the WHO global database of individual case safety reports

In adults, statins safety profile is well known. However, literature data on their adverse drug reactions (ADRs) remain scarce in children in real-life setting. In order to better characterize ADRs related to ‘real-life’ use of statins in children, we reviewed statin-related ADRs recorded in the World Health Organization (WHO) global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs), VigiBase. Methods. Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) in children (2–11 years) and adolescents (12–17 years) associated with statins from January 1, 1987, to July 18, 2017, were extracted from VigiBase. Characteristics of ICSRs, type of ADRs according to MedDRA classification (SOC and PT), and ICSR seriousness were described using SAS 9.4. A total of 311 ICSRs were identified for 8 statins with 712 ADRs. Musculoskeletal disorders (n = 85, 27.3%) were the first registered ADRs followed by general disorders (n = 67, 21.5%; mainly asthenia and pain). More than 1 out of 5 ADRs were ‘injury, poisoning and procedural complications’ (n = 67), mainly accidental or intentional exposures (n = 44, 14.1%), overdoses (n = 14, 4.5%), or off-label use (n = 11, 3.5%). Overall, 133 (42.8%) reports were ‘serious’, including 11 deaths. Deaths mainly involved adolescents with intentional overdose and completed suicide with other associated drugs in 75% of reports. Our study identified rare but serious safety issues (rhabdomyolysis, myalgia, and hepatocellular injury). These ADRs can impact quality of life or lead to life-threatening complications in children. Our results should be supplemented with other data sources. Spontaneous statin ADR reports in children to pharmacovigilance networks must be promoted.     

Safety assessment and adverse drug reaction reporting of tea tree oil (Melaleuca aetheroleum)

Tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) essential oil is widely used as an antiseptic. It mainly consists of monoterpenes with terpinen-4-ol as the major constituent. The aim of this study was to review literature on safety data about tea tree oil and to assess its safety by investigating 159 cases of adverse reactions possibly caused by the oil, reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) from December 1987 until September 2021. To extract these data, VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports maintained by the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC), was used. All cases were categorized and analysed and 16 serious cases further assessed. It was concluded that tea tree oil should never be administered orally, as it can lead to central nervous system depression and pneumonitis. Applied topically, skin disorders may occur, especially when the oil had been exposed to light or air. This yields monoterpene oxidation products, being potent skin irritants. Tea tree oil stored under appropriate conditions and not exceeding the expiration date should be considered safe to use by non-vulnerable people for non-serious inflammatory skin conditions, although the occurrence of adverse reactions such as contact allergies is difficult to predict.