Preventing Adverse Drug Reactions After Hospital Discharge (PADR-AD): Protocol for a randomised-controlled trial in older people

BackgroundAdverse drug reactions (ADRs) and adverse drug events (ADEs) in older people contribute to a significant proportion of hospital admissions and are common following discharge. Effective interventions are therefore required to combat the growing burden of preventable ADRs. The Prediction of Hospitalisation due to Adverse Drug Reactions in Elderly Community Dwelling Patients (PADR-EC) score is a validated risk score developed to assess the risk of ADRs in people aged 65 years and older and has the potential to be utilised as part of an intervention to reduce ADRs.ObjectivesThis trial was designed to investigate the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce ADR incidence in older people and to obtain further information about ADRs and ADEs in the 12–24 months following hospital discharge.MethodsThe study is an open-label randomised-controlled trial to be conducted at the Royal Hobart Hospital, a 500-bed public hospital in Tasmania, Australia. Community-dwelling patients aged 65 years and older with an unplanned overnight admission to a general medical ward will be recruited. Following admission, the PADR-EC ADR score will be calculated by a research pharmacist, with the risk communicated to clinicians and discussed with participants. Following discharge, nominated general practitioners and community pharmacists will receive the risk score and related medication management advice to guide their ongoing care of the patient. Follow-up with participants will occur at 3 and 12 and 18 and 24 months to identify ADRs and ADEs. The primary outcome is moderate-severe ADRs at 12 months post-discharge, and will be analysed using the cumulative incidence proportion, survival analysis and Poisson regression.SummaryIt is hypothesised that the trial will reduce ADRs and ADEs in the intervention population. The study will also provide valuable data on post-discharge ADRs and ADEs up to 24 months post-discharge.     

“317护”宣教平台联合肠道准备评估单在结肠镜检查前的应用

目的评价“317护”宣教平台联合肠道准备评估单在肠镜检查前的应用效果。方法选取2020年10月-2021年1月我科行结肠镜检查的住院患者120例为研究对象。根据住院时间分为观察组和对照组,各60例。观察组实施“317护”宣教平台联合肠道准备评估单进行肠道准备,对照组使用肠道准备评估单进行肠道准备。比较两组肠道清洁度、肠道清洁剂服用方法正确率、肠道准备满意度。结果观察组肠道清洁度评分、肠道清洁剂服用方法正确率及肠道准备满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论应用“317护”宣教平台联合肠道准备评估单在肠镜检查前进行健康宣教后,提高了患者肠道清洁度、肠道清洁剂服用方法正确率及肠道准备满意度。     

Defining Textbook Outcome in liver surgery and assessment of hospital variation: A nationwide population-based study

IntroductionTextbook outcome (TO) is a composite outcome measure covering the surgical care process in a single outcome measure. TO has an advantage over single outcome parameters with low event rates, which have less discriminating impact to detect differences between hospitals. This study aimed to assess factors associated with TO, and evaluate hospital and network variation after case-mix correction in TO rates for liver surgery.MethodsThis was a population-based retrospective study of all patients who underwent liver resection for malignancy in the Netherlands in 2019 and 2020. TO was defined as absence of severe postoperative complications, mortality, prolonged length of hospital stay, and readmission, and obtaining adequate resection margins. Multivariable logistic regression was used for case-mix adjustment.Results2376 patients were included. TO was accomplished in 1380 (80%) patients with colorectal liver metastases, in 192 (76%) patients with other liver metastases, in 183 (74%) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and 86 (51%) patients with biliary cancers. Factors associated with lower TO rates for CRLM included ASA score ≥3 (aOR 0.70, CI 0.51–0.95 p = 0.02), extrahepatic disease (aOR 0.64, CI 0.44–0.95, p = 0.02), tumour size >55 mm on preoperative imaging (aOR 0.56, CI 0.34–0.94, p = 0.02), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (aOR 0.73, CI 0.54–0.98, p = 0.04), and major liver resection (aOR 0.50, CI 0.36–0.69, p < 0.001). After case-mix correction, no significant hospital or oncological network variation was observed.ConclusionTO differs between indications for liver resection and can be used to assess between hospital and network differences.     

2022年北京冬奥会定点医院医疗卫生保障实践

2022年北京冬奥会是全球瞩目的盛事，如何有效提升延庆赛区定点医院医疗卫生保障能力是冬奥会筹办过程中需要解决的重大课题。文章系统总结延庆赛区冬奥定点医院医疗保障特点、主要做法和经验，旨在为今后大型赛事定点医院的医疗保障提供参考。     

高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定雷公藤制剂中5种有效成分的含量

目的:建立高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定雷公藤制剂中雷公藤甲素、雷公藤内酯酮、雷公藤晋碱、雷公藤次碱和雷公藤红素的含量。方法:采用电喷雾正电离模式和多反应监测模式。雷公藤甲素、雷公藤内酯酮、雷公藤晋碱和雷公藤次碱含量测定,以含5 mmol·L^-1碳酸氢铵的水溶液和纯甲醇作为流动相,采用梯度洗脱方式在ACE UltraCore SuperPhenylHexyl(2.1 mm×50.0 mm,5 μm)色谱柱上进行分离。雷公藤红素含量测定,以含0.5%甲酸的水溶液和含0.1%甲酸的乙腈作为流动相,采用等度洗脱在ACE Excel C₁₈-AR(2.1 mm×50.0 mm,5 μm)色谱柱上进行分离。结果:雷公藤甲素、雷公藤内酯酮、雷公藤晋碱、雷公藤次碱和雷公藤红素分别在2.4~1 200,2.0~1 000,80~40 000,80~40 000和10~5 000 ng·mL^-1范围内线性关系良好,平均加样回收率分别为 94.56%,102.36%,93.27%,95.67%和99.82%,RSD均低于5.13%。结论:本方法运行时间短,灵敏度高,精密度和重复性好,适用于雷公藤制剂中雷公藤甲素、雷公藤内酯酮、雷公藤晋碱、雷公藤次碱和雷公藤红素5种活性成分定量检测,可为雷公藤制剂多指标质量控制提供实验依据。     

Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy by using the transperineal (TP) versus transrectal (TR) route in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) remains to be revealed. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2019 was conducted. We pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for csPCa detected by TP and TR MRI-targeted biopsy. The relative sensitivity (or risk ratio) between TP and TR route was synthesized. We also pooled the diagnostic sensitivity of either approach using the combined biopsy results as the reference standard. A total of 328 patients with positive multiparametric MRI underwent TP MRI-targeted biopsy, and 315 patients underwent TR MRI-targeted biopsy. The TP route detected more csPCa, with a detection rate of 62.2% (204/328) compared to 41.3% (130/315) for the TR route (odds ratio = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.71-3.26). After adjusting for differences in cancer prevalence, TP MRI-targeted biopsy detected 91.3% (105/115) of csPCa compared to 72.2% (83/115) by the TR route (risk ratio = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.54). The pooled diagnostic sensitivity of the TP route (86%; 95% CI, 77-96) was better than the TR route (73%, 62-88%). The TR approach missed more csPCa located at the anterior zone of the prostate (20 vs. 3). The TP route performed better than the TR route in MRI-targeted biopsy, especially in detecting csPCa located at the anterior prostate. More large prospective randomized or head-to-head comparison studies comparing the two approaches are warranted.     

人性化护理模式在手术室护理中的应用价值评价

目的讨论人性化护理模式对手术室患者治疗效果。方法回顾分析我院2018年1月-2018年12月份手术室收治的160例患者,按照患者的个人意愿随机分为常规护理组和人性化护理组,每组各80例。分别采取常规护理和人性化护理,对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果根据数据统计结果显示,人性化护理组患者的护理满意度(73.75%)高于常规护理组(58.75%),P<0.05,具有统计学意义。结论由于手术室患者的病情较重,而且很容易对手术产生明显的恐惧情绪。而人性化护理模式能够照顾患者情绪,有效减少手术时间,增强患者的手术信息,确保整个手术顺利进行,也能够促进术后患者的康复效果。