ABSTRACTIntroduction: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one of the most common causes of blindness among the working population worldwide. Clearly, there is an unmet clinical need to find better treatment options for DR.Areas covered: The literature search was conducted on PubMed with no limitation on language or year of publication. The review focuses on the clinically used drugs/proteins along with a brief background on the pathophysiology of DR. The major focus of this review revolves around three treatment approaches involving drugs/proteins, drug delivery formulations and drug delivery devices. In each category, major advances are discussed along with the possible solutions. We have also discussed the various modes of administration that are currently being evaluated in the clinic. An attempt has been made to address the potential targeted site of action for DR drug delivery, and also to understand the role of Blood Retinal Barrier (BRB).Expert Opinion: In the current scenario, although there have been some advances in the drug delivery devices for delivering drugs/proteins, there are still challenges to be overcome with regard to the particulate systems. For long-term success of DR therapeutics, research options should consider taking into account the 3Ds (drug, delivery and devices). 相似文献
A ‘vascular normalization index'' (VNI) based on the changes in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters Ktrans and cerebral blood volume (CBV), combined with blood sampling, has been shown to correlate with patient outcome in recurrent glioblastoma after a single dose of antiangiogenic therapy. Here, by applying a novel contrast agent extravasation correction method insensitive to variations in tissue mean transit time, we show that a similar VNI parameter can be derived from a single dynamic susceptibility contrast MR acquisition rather than the three parameters shown previously. Our results show that this new VNI parameter, which combines changes in tumoral CBV and an apparent transfer constant from our leakage correction method, may provide prognostic information in an even simpler manner than prior efforts. 相似文献
AIM: To compare the efficacy of low-fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) combinations in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
METHODS: Forty-five previously untreated eyes of 45 patients with exudative AMD whose best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was ≥0.3 (Snellen) were enrolled. 15 patients in Group I underwent low-fluence PDT (25J/cm2-300mW/cm2-83sec) and intravitreal pegaptanib combination, 15 patients in Group II underwent PDT (50J/cm2-600mW/cm2-83sec) and intravitreal pegaptanib combination while, 15 patients in Group III underwent intravitreal pegaptanib monotherapy. Complete ophthalmologic examinations were performed in pre and post treatment visits, and the results were statistically analised. A clinical activity score (CAS) was calculated by using changes in lesion size, amount of hemorrhage, staining pattern in FA and OCT measurement of intra/subretinal fluid. ≤ 3 logMAR lines of decrease in BCVA and decrease in CAS were considered as successful treatment.
RESULTS: The mean age of 19 female (42.2%) and 26 male (57.8%) patients was 72.82±8.02 years. Mean follow-up was 13.93±5.87 months. Lesion type was occult in 28 eyes (62.2%). Treatment success rates according to BCVA assessments were 86.7%, 80%, 60% and mean BCVA decrease were 0.3, 1.0, 2.2 logMAR lines in Group I, II and III, respectively (P>0.05). According to the changes in central macular thickness and CAS, no difference was found among the study groups (P=0.850 and P=0.811, respectively). Patients treated with combination regimens had lower intravitreal injection frequencies (P=0.015).
CONCLUSION: Combination regimen with intravitreal pegaptanib and low-fluence PDT seems to be safe and effective in stabilizing the clinical activity and BCVA in exudative AMD. 相似文献
To evaluate changes in macular morphology due to myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV), using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
Methods
In all, 22 eyes with recent-onset untreated CNV underwent 1 intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), followed by a pro-re-nata regimen. SD-OCT was performed at baseline (before first administration of anti-VEGF treatment) and month 1, and 2; macular morphologic changes and outer retina characteristics (SD-OCT findings) associated with CNV activity were evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for SD-OCT findings using fluorescein angiography (FA) as standard reference.
Results
Mean central retinal thickness (CRT) showed no significant reduction from baseline (284±98 μm) to month 1 (257±74 μm) and month 2 (263±72 μm). A hyper-reflective lesion with fuzzy borders (fuzzy area), and ‘absent or altered'' IS/OS junction were the only SD-OCT findings associated with CNV activity (P<0.0001). Both these SD-OCT findings showed good sensitivity and specificity (95.1 and 96.0% (95% CI: 0.87–0.89), respectively, for the fuzzy area; 87.9 and 66.7% (95% CI: 0.65–0.87), respectively, for ‘absent or altered'' IS/OS junction) when compared with FA leakage (standard reference).
Conclusions
Outer retina characteristics (ie, hyper-reflective lesion with fuzzy borders, and ‘absent or altered'' IS/OS junction) appear more meaningful than CRT in the evaluation of myopic CNV activity. These SD-OCT findings show overall good sensitivity and specificity when compared with FA leakage (standard reference), and could be considered as an alternative diagnostic tool to FA for myopic CNV monitoring. 相似文献
结果:与术前相比,A组患者术后2wk,1mo DCP血流密度显著增加、CMT明显降低、BCVA明显改善(均P<0.05),B组患者术后1mo CMT降低、BCVA改善(均P<0.05)。术后2wk、1mo,A组患者DCP血流密度较B组明显增加(43.37%±2.72% vs 41.03%±2.60%,45.01%±2.28% vs 41.20%±2.43%,均P<0.05),CMT较B组明显降低(303.4±30.36μm vs 329.60±31.47μm,268.67±30.27μm vs 319.40±28.63μm,均P<0.05),BCVA(LogMAR)较B组明显改善(0.28±0.11 vs 0.40±0.13,0.23±0.14 vs 0.38±0.15,均P<0.05)。
AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex®/DEX) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) either naïve or non-naïve to anti-VEGF therapies who switched to DEX implant independent of response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs).
METHODS: This was an audit retrospective review of medical records of patients with DME who switched to the DEX intravitreal implant. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients naïve to antiangiogenic therapy and patients who were previously treated with anti-VEGFs. Data regarding demographics, changes in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) was collected over 6mo. The demographic data mean changes in BCVA, CMT, and IOP were compared. Six-month follow-up data of 47 patients (57 eyes), who either switched to DEX implant irrespective of response to previous treatments or were treatment naïve before receiving DEX implant, was collected.
RESULTS: Improvement in mean BCVA was observed from 1-4mo after injection with a decreased effect at month 6 as expected, with better outcomes in naïve compared to non-naïve patients. A statistically relevant decrease in mean CMT was observed during the follow-up period. An increase in mean IOP was observed in the first 2mo after DEX therapy. The mean number of injections of the overall population during the 6mo was 1.3. A subgroup analysis showed no relevant difference between phakic versus pseudophakic patients relative to measured outcomes. There was no cataract progression during the follow-up period and no adverse events reported.
CONCLUSION: This real-life setting study shows that intravitreal DEX implant is effective and safe. The timings of greater therapeutic impact are concordant with previous studies and suggest that earlier treatment with corticosteroids may have an additional benefit in naïve patients. 相似文献