Background:Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is widely applied to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). To elucidate metabolism and toxicity of arsenic, we analyzed time course of arsenic species in red blood cells (RBCs) of APL patients.
Methods:Nine APL patients received ATO (0.16 mg/kg/day) through 18-h infusion. Blood was collected before daily administration (days 2 to 9), and at different time points on day 8. Inorganic arsenic (iAs), monomethylarsonic acid (MMA), and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) were detected by HPLC-ICP-MS.
Results:Arsenic species reached Cmax at 18 h on day 8. Arsenicals gradually accumulated during days 2 to 9, whereas their percentages remained almost constant. The general trend in red blood cells (RBCs) was iAs > MMA > DMA. MMA was consistently the predominant methylated arsenic metabolite in RBCs. iAs, MMA, and tAs (tAs = iAs + DMA + MMA) concentrations (P < 0.0001), MMA/DMA ratios (P = 0.0016) and iAs% (P = 0.0013) were higher in RBCs than in plasma.
Conclusions:Time course of arsenic species reveal kinetic characteristic of ATO metabolites in RBCs. Arsenic species accumulated with administration frequency. Arsenic species in RBCs were remarkably different from those in plasma. Time course of arsenic species in RBCs is important in ATO clinical application. 相似文献
As all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) are widely accepted in treating acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), deescalating toxicity becomes a research hotspot. Here, we evaluated whether chemotherapy could be replaced or reduced by ATO in APL patients at different risks. After achieving complete remission with ATRA-ATO–based induction therapy, patients were randomized (1:1) into ATO and non-ATO groups for consolidation: ATRA-ATO versus ATRA–anthracycline for low-/intermediate-risk patients, or ATRA-ATO–anthracycline versus ATRA–anthracycline–cytarabine for high-risk patients. The primary end point was to assess disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 y by a noninferiority margin of –5%; 855 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 54.9 mo, and 658 of 755 patients could be evaluated at 3 y. In the ATO group, 96.1% (319/332) achieved 3-y DFS, compared to 92.6% (302/326) in the non-ATO group. The difference was 3.45% (95% CI –0.07 to 6.97), confirming noninferiority (P < 0.001). Using the Kaplan–Meier method, the estimated 7-y DFS was 95.7% (95% CI 93.6 to 97.9) in ATO and 92.6% (95% CI 89.8 to 95.4) in non-ATO groups (P = 0.066). Concerning secondary end points, the 7-y cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in ATO (2.2% [95% CI 1.1 to 4.2]) than in non-ATO group (6.1% [95% CI 3.9 to 9.5], P = 0.011). In addition, grade 3 to 4 hematological toxicities were significantly reduced in the ATO group during consolidation. Hence, ATRA-ATO in both chemotherapy-replacing and -reducing settings in consolidation is not inferior to ATRA–chemotherapy (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01987297","term_id":"NCT01987297"}}NCT01987297).The treatment of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) combined with anthracycline-based chemotherapy has remarkably improved the prognosis of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), achieving over 90% complete remission (CR) and 60 to 80% long-term survival (1–6). For patients relapsed from ATRA-chemotherapy, arsenic trioxide (ATO) was initially used as salvage therapy and showed a satisfactory outcome (7–9). Then, the treatment of newly diagnosed APL with an ATRA-ATO combination therapy was reported in 2004, which demonstrated curative effects in 90% of patients (10–13). The advantage of ATO as the front-line treatment of APL has been further validated by a number of international working groups (14–18). Meanwhile, an exploratory study on ATRA-ATO with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, the cytotoxic agent calicheamicin linked an anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody) by the MD Anderson Cancer Center suggested that a deescalating cytotoxic regimen might be feasible for APL patients (14, 19).A large body of evidence has been obtained to show that both ATRA and ATO target the APL-specific PML-RARA oncoprotein and the two agents may exert a synergistic effect in achieving a curative clinical effect in most APL (2, 9). However, in our previous studies, though ATRA-ATO were used as main therapeutic agents for induction, the consolidation was based on chemotherapy rather than ATO, which could cause life-threatening myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity (10, 11). Besides, risk-stratified treatment had not been introduced, leading to probable overtreatment for low- risk (a white blood cell [WBC] count ≤ 10 × 109/L and a platelet count > 40 × 109/L) to intermediate-risk (a WBC count ≤ 10 × 109/L and a platelet count ≤ 40 × 109/L) patients (20). These issues warranted further clinical investigations to address the role of ATRA-ATO in consolidation and to adapt the treatment protocols to distinct clinical risks. In order to optimize the treatment protocols by reducing their relevant toxicities and costs, as well as further improving therapeutic efficacy and tolerance, we proposed a multicenter randomized trial, APL2012, deriving from our previous ATRA-ATO–based therapy taking into consideration of Sanz risk stratification (20). The objective of this study was to examine whether chemotherapy could be replaced or reduced in consolidation therapy by ATO in patients with APL at different risks. 相似文献
In adult therapy, arsenic trioxide (ATO) and all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) are recognized as active treatment of relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The efficacy of this combination in pediatric APL has not yet been well established. We report the case of a 6-year-old girl with relapsed APL, with a PML-RARα mutation, treated with a combination of ATO and ATRA. Over a period of 5 months, she received in total, 75 doses of intravenous ATO and 40 doses of oral ATRA. Currently, 22 months after relapse, she is still in complete remission. Here, we describe treatment of a relapsed APL in a child with limited treatment of ATO and ATRA and review the literature. 相似文献