排序方式： 共有26条查询结果，搜索用时 828 毫秒
1.
《Vaccine》2018,36(44):6509-6511
Most members of the general public use the internet to research health topics. However, the quality of vaccine-related material available online is mixed and internet search engines often bring web users to low-quality anti-vaccine websites.We present a case study of a pro-vaccine information hub launched in 2011. Vaccines Today provides high-quality information about vaccines and diseases, expert interviews, answers to frequently asked questions, parent/patient stories and videos/infographics. Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Instagram are used to share this content and to engage with various online audiences.This Commentary outlines what works in online communication about vaccines and offers proposals for improving the impact of online vaccine advocacy. The value of networking to boost visibility and search engine ranking is emphasised. Furthermore, we present the case for the sharing and application of best practice in online communication. 相似文献
2.
介绍了南京军区神州总医院网站建设的成功经验：一是以人为本，设置网站栏目和功能；二是突出医院文化的独特内涵；三是充分利用网络优势，实现互动交流；四是努力建成为医务人员继续教育的园地；五是建立有效的运作机制。 相似文献
3.
采用网络信息计量学的方法评价国内医科院校网站的影响力,建立评价体系并确定指标权重,收集数据并进行规范化,所得出的排名基本和各高校综合实力相符。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
本文以中国公众健康网(CHealth)和国际上最具影响力的公众健康网站MedlinePlus?为对象,从健康信息权威性、资源建设、信息组织与利用、网站设计几方面对两网站做比较分析,并提出几点建议,以期为我国公众健康网站建设提供有价值的参考。 相似文献
7.
8.
《Patient education and counseling》2022,105(4):933-941
Objectives and methodsA wealth of online anxiety information exists but much of it is not evidence-based or well-balanced. This study evaluated anxiety websites (N = 20) on readability, quality, usability, visual design, and content.ResultsOverall, websites were of reasonable quality but only half were considered understandable according to the PEMAT usability scale (70% cutoff value). The average reading level across websites was 11.2 (SMOG), which is higher than NIH recommended grade 6–7 level. Websites had variable design features and a trending association suggested websites with better design come up earlier in search results. The number of topics covered varied across websites and most did not adequately cover all topics of interest. Most websites included information about psychological and self-help treatments, how treatment works, and what treatment entails. The Top 5 websites were: (1) Anxiety BC, (2) ADAA, (3) Mind, (4) Beyond Blue, and (5) Web MD.ConclusionsThis is the first study to evaluate existing anxiety information websites based on the dimensions described above and their relationship to Google search results.Practice implicationsThis study highlights the importance of considering several dimensions in developing mental health resources and provides direction for strategies to improve existing websites and/or develop new resources. 相似文献
9.
A. Barrow S. Palmer S. Thomas S. Guy J. Brotherton L. Dear J. Pearson 《Physiotherapy》2018,104(3):318-326
Background
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition that affects over 8.75 million people in the UK. Approximately 43% of people in the UK search for health and medical information online. However, health information on the internet is of variable quality. Research into the quality of online OA information is dated and there is a need to evaluate the existing information.Objectives
To assess the quality of websites which provide educational information for patients with OA.Design
Electronic cross-sectional survey.Methods
The search term ‘osteoarthritis’ was entered into the five popular UK-based search engines in order to identify 50 unique websites. These websites were appraised by two assessors using criteria developed from the available literature and recent guidelines of the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. The appraisal considered the general quality of the website and OA-specific content.Results
Most of the websites evaluated (34/50, 68%) scored more than half of the maximum available quality score (max score 59). The median total score was 41. For general quality of the website, the median score was nine (range three to 16, out of 16), and for OA-specific content, the median score was 31 (range two to 43, out of 43). Websites of higher quality were created more recently, disclosed sources of information, had external seals of approval and directed the reader on to other relevant websites.Conclusions
The internet is a potentially useful tool for educating and empowering healthcare consumers. The websites evaluated were generally of a ‘high’ standard; however, there was wide variation in the quality of information. 相似文献10.