路径式营养管理在食管癌患者围术期的应用研究

目的 探讨路径式营养管理在食管癌围术期患者中的应用效果。方法 选取2018年1月至2018年7月在四川省肿瘤医院胸外科接受食管癌根治手术治疗的患者156例，随机分为干预组（n=78）和对照组（n=78），干预组采用路径式营养管理，对照组采用常规营养管理，比较两组患者在术后7d血红蛋白、前白蛋白、体质指数（BMI）、预后营养指数（PNI）等营养指标、术后并发症发生率及术后住院时间。结果 干预组患者术后7d血红蛋白（126.09±16.69）g/L、前白蛋白（208.74±38.51）mg/L、BMI（22.28±2.05）kg/m2、PNI（46.62±4.03）优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；干预组患者胸腔积液发生率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（t=4.02，P=0.04）；干预组患者住院时间短于对照组，差异有统计学意义（t=6.53，P=0.03）。结论 路径式营养管理能有效改善食管癌围术期患者营养状况、降低并发症发生率、缩短术后住院时间。     

Management recommendations for patients with chronic kidney disease during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic

COVID-19 has become a pandemic and it has already spread to at least 171 countries/regions. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global public health problem with a total of approximately 850 million patients with CKD worldwide and 119.5 million in China. Severe COVID-19 infection may damage the kidney and cause acute tubular necrosis, leading to proteinuria, hematuria and elevated serum creatinine. Since the SARS-CoV-2 enters the cells by binding to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, some doctors question its ability to increase the risk and severity of developing COVID-19. Neither clinical data nor basic scientific evidence supports this assumption. Therefore, patients who take angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker are not advised to change their therapy. Patients with CKD are generally the elderly population suffering from multiple comorbidities. Moreover, some patients with CKD might need to take glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. Dialysis patients are recurrently exposed to a possible contaminated environment because their routine treatment usually requires three dialysis sessions per week. Considering all the above reasons, patients with CKD are more vulnerable to COVID-19 than the general population. The development of COVID-19 may worsen the impaired kidney function and further lead to rapid deterioration of kidney function and even death. Strict comprehensive protocols should be followed to prevent the spread of COVID-19 among patients with CKD. In this review, we provide some practical management recommendations for health care providers, patients with CKD, dialysis patients and dialysis facilities.     

中药调剂管理中药配方颗粒与中药饮片应用对比分析

目的:探讨中药调剂管理过程中,中药配方颗粒与中药饮片的应用效果差异。方法:对医院开具的中药处方情况以及23名工作人员和200例患者的调查结果进行分析,探讨中药调剂管理过程中,中药配方颗粒与中药饮片的应用效果差异。结果:使用中药配方颗粒的发药出错率和调配出错率均少于使用中药饮片的方式(P<0.05)。在对23名药房工作人员的调查结果中显示,工作人员对于中药配方颗粒的每项态度均优于中药饮片(P<0.05)。在对200名患者的调查结果中显示,患者对于中药配方颗粒的每项态度均优于中药饮片(P<0.05)。结论:在中药调剂的管理过程中,中药配方颗粒的管理方式具有较多的优势,得到患者与医务工作者双方的认可。     

Pseudoquistes abdominales,una complicación rara de los sistemas de derivación ventrículo-peritoneal: revisión sistemática de la literatura

Since the first report in 1954, abdominal pseudocysts have been recognized as a particularly uncommon complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunts of CSF, so their etiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic management remain very controversial.Our objective is to offer a critical and updated systematic review of those controversial points, using a thorough search and review of the most relevant literature available.The clinical presentation of pseudocysts is normally through non-specific abdominal symptoms. The most validated etiology consists on the existence of a concomitant infection of the CSF shunt system, and so, treatment needs of antibiotherapy and total or partial substitution of the system. However, the pseudocyst itself doesn’t need an active treatment, except for some specific cases. This management, algorithmically presented in the present work, achieves a lower recurrence rate than other options, but this one is still important, and is also associated with other complications of those shunts related with several other factors which need to be taken in account.     

Current thinking in the management of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is an aggressive, rare, malignant tumour that accounts for about 1% of all head and neck neoplasms and 10% of all salivary gland tumours. It is characterised by frequent local recurrences and distant metastases. Growth is slow but relentless, and progression poses a challenge to head and neck clinicians. Many small retrospective studies have described its clinical management, but the lack of multicentre, randomised, controlled trials has resulted in inconsistencies in management globally. We have focused on three key management-related controversies: the role of elective neck dissection (END) for the N0 neck; the role of adjuvant treatment or radiotherapy; and finally, the follow-up protocol, particularly cross-sectional surveillance imaging of the full body or chest computed tomography (CT) alone, and options for treatment if metastases are found. The paucity of published studies may reflect the inconsistencies that exist in the management of ACC of the head and neck in the UK. The collaboration of head and neck centres would, we think, help to correct the imbalance in these three domains of care.     

Impact of Spinal Manipulation on Lower Extremity Motor Control in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients: A Small-Scale Assessor-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of a single lumbar spinal manipulation (SM) intervention on the leg movement performance of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients in a small-scale registered randomized clinical trial.MethodsParticipants with LSS (n = 14) were tested at baseline for pain, lumbar range of motion, and behavioral or kinematic motor performance (using an established Fitts’ Law foot-pointing task), then underwent covariate adaptive randomization to receive SM or no intervention. Postintervention all dependent measures were repeated. Experimenters were blinded to patient group allocation. University ethics board approval was attained.ResultsFor the primary outcome movement time, there was no significant difference between groups. As predicted by Fitts’ Law, all participants had longer movement times as task difficulty increased. Secondary kinematic outcomes yielded no significant between-group differences. Consistent with Fitts’ Law, kinematic measures changed significantly with task difficulty. Pairwise comparisons revealed the kinematic variables were more adversely affected by greater movement amplitudes than target size changes. No exploratory differences in pain or lumbar range of motion were observed.ConclusionChanges in motor performance were not observed in this chronic pain population after a single SM intervention compared with a control group. Given the sample size, the study may have been underpowered to detect meaningful differences. Fitts’ Law was observed for the lower extremity–pointing task for an LSS population and may provide an objective measure of motor performance.