浙江省2007－2017年罕见病住院病例特征分析

目的 分析2007-2017年浙江省24 388例罕见病住院病例特征，为制定罕见病防控策略提供依据。方法 收集2007-2017年浙江省10家三级甲等（三甲）医院罕见病住院病例资料和各年度住院数，进行描述性统计分析。结果 罕见病病例共24 388例，占住院总例数的2.69‰（24 388/9 054 201），病例数居前3位的疾病类型依次为"血液和造血器官疾病以及某些涉及免疫机能的异常"（占32.81%，8 001/24 388）、"先天性畸形、变形和染色体异常"（占24.87%，6 065/24 388）和"神经系统疾病"（占19.01%，4 635/24 388）；2007-2017年罕见病病例数呈逐年增长趋势，年均增幅19.69%，而罕见病例数占同期住院总例数比例仅在2016-2017年明显上升，各类型罕见病时间分布呈不同特征；罕见病的病例数男女性别比为1.35：1（13 990/10 398），男女性别比最高的3类疾病依次为"消化系统疾病"（4.45：1，1 180/265）、"损伤、中毒和外因的某些其他后果"（3.51：1，281/80）和"神经系统疾病"（2.26：1，3 213/1 422）；各年龄段罕见病类型、各类型罕见病年龄分布均呈不同特征；病例数居前10位的疾病占全部罕见病例数的53.55%（13 060/24 388），其中前3位疾病分别为成人粒细胞缺乏症（14.41%，3 515/24 388）、皮质基底核退化症（7.60%，1 854/24 388）和亨诺克-舍恩莱因紫癜（6.01%，1 466/24 388）。结论 本研究分析的浙江省2007-2017年24 388例罕见病住院病例的特征资料，是推动我国罕见病的研究、监测或登记数据库构建、制定防控策略的参考依据。     

Stroke and stroke risk factors in women of reproductive age with a history of metabolic or bariatric surgery

ObjectiveTo determine the odds of stroke in women of reproductive age who have had metabolic or bariatric surgery (MBS).MethodsWe used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), a publicly available dataset that samples 20% of hospital discharges. The study population includes women between the ages of 20 and 44 without a maternal admission code. Weighted logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the odds of stroke in women with history of MBS compared to other women of reproductive age. Adjustment of odds was done for the following covariates: age, race, primary payer, severity of illness, depression, and obesity.ResultsWomen with a history of MBS had 52% lower adjusted odds of having a stroke than women who did not have MBS (OR = 0.48, 95%CI = 0.42-0.55). Additionally, women who had MBS had lower odds of risk factors for stroke, including diabetes (OR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.59-0.63), hypertension (OR = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.81-0.84), hypercholesterolemia (OR=0.72, 95%CI =0.68-0.77), and migraine with aura (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.74-0.99).ConclusionsAmong women of reproductive age with a history of MBS, there were lower odds of having a stroke and stroke risk factors when compared to women who did not have MBS. Additionally, this study showed a modest decrease in the odds of stroke among women with obesity when adjusted for other risk factors. Future research should focus on examining this finding further, with a focus on the moderation of the impact of having obesity on stroke risk independent of other stroke risk factors.     

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery: a review of the literature

Day-case surgery (DCS) in digestive surgery is a hot topic, and new indications for DCS in the field of gastrointestinal surgery have recently been described. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a popular bariatric procedure in recent years. LSG is a reproducible, standardized procedure with a short operating time and possibly simple perioperative management. It therefore meets the criteria to be performed as a DCS procedure. Recently published series of LSG as DCS have demonstrated its feasibility. In this review on LSG performed as DCS, we focused on the management of risks associated with DCS and the results of such type of management. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Embase databases. Six studies were selected, comprising a total of 6227 patients. Most published series were retrospective single-center studies. Inclusion criteria were similar between most studies (primary sleeve gastrectomy for most series, patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m² or a body mass index ≥35 kg/m² in the presence of co-morbidities), while exclusion criteria were based on literature data for some studies (using series on risk factors for morbidity and mortality after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) and personal experience for other series. The mortality rate of LSG as DCS ranges 0%–.08%, while the overall complication rate ranges 0%–10%. The unplanned overnight admission rate after LSG ranges .8%–8%. The unscheduled hospitalization rates range 2.1%–8.5%. LSG performed as DCS is feasible with good results, but cannot be proposed for all patients. Good selection is necessary in others to avoid increased risk of morbidity and mortality.