Neighborhood resources associated with frailty trajectories over time among community-dwelling older adults in China

Background and objectivesRecent research has identified neighborhoods as an important contributor to later-life frailty. However, little is known about how neighborhood resources are associated with frailty trajectories over time, especially in developing countries. This study examines the impact of neighborhood physical and social resources on the trajectories of frailty over time among older people in China.Research design and methodsUsing the four waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011–2018), 5673 respondents aged 60 and above at baseline were included for analyses. Multilevel growth modeling was fitted to estimate the effects of neighborhood resources on frailty trajectories over a 7-year period, controlling for individual-level characteristics.ResultsOlder Chinese people who lived in neighborhoods with better basic infrastructures and a greater number of voluntary organizations were less frail at baseline. Accessible exercise facilities were associated with a lower initial level of frailty only among rural older adults, while higher community-level socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with a lower initial level of frailty only among urban older adults. Over the 7-year follow-up period, better basic infrastructures and accessible exercise facilities were associated with a slower increase rate of frailty scores among rural residents.Discussion and implicationsNeighborhood resources are important contributors to the level of frailty among older Chinese people. Our findings of significant urban-rural differences have important implications for designing and implementing infrastructure development and community building programs in rural and urban China.     

Patient frailty predicts worse perioperative outcomes and higher cost after radical cystectomy

Background: Relatively few studies investigated the importance of frailty in radical cystectomy (RC) patients. We tested the ability of frailty, using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups indicator, to predict early perioperative outcomes after RC.Methods: RC patients were identified within the National Inpatient Sample database (2000–2015). The effect of frailty, age and Charlson Comorbidity Index were tested in five separate multivariable models predicting: (1) complications, (2) failure to rescue (FTR), (3) in-hospital mortality, (4) length of stay (LOS) and (5) total hospital charges (THCs). All models were weighted and adjusted for clustering, as well as all available patient and hospital characteristics.Results: Of 23,967 RC patients, 5833 (24.3%) were frail, 7721 (32.2%) were aged ≥75 years and 2832 (11.8%) had CCI ≥2. Frailty, age ≥75 years and CCI ≥2 were non-overlapping in 86.3% of the cohort. Any two or three of these features were recorded in 12.4 and 1.3%, respectively. Frailty was an independent predictor of all five examined endpoints and the magnitude of its association was stronger or at least equal than that of age ≥75 years and CCI ≥2.Conclusion: Frailty, advanced age and comorbidities represent non-overlapping patients’ characteristics. Of those, frailty represents the most consistent and strongest predictor of early adverse outcomes after RC. Ideally, all three indicators should be considered in retrospective, as well as prospective analyses. Pre-surgical recognition of frail patients should be ideally incorporate in clinical practice in order to address these patients to multimodal pre-habilitation programs that may potentially improve the perioperative prognosis.     

Frailty评分对枸橼酸伊沙佐米治疗多发性骨髓瘤不良反应的预测价值

目的 探讨Frailty评分对枸橼酸伊沙佐米治疗多发性骨髓瘤(multiple myeloma, MM)不良反应的预测价值。方法 选取MM患者72例,均予以枸橼酸伊沙佐米联合沙利度胺、地塞米松方案治疗,观察治疗效果及不良反应。并根据患者不良反应程度分为Ⅰ～Ⅱ级组和Ⅲ～Ⅳ级组。比较2组Frailty评分;采用Cox回归模型分析化疗相关Ⅲ～Ⅳ级不良反应的影响因素;采用ROC曲线模型分析Frailty评分对化疗相关Ⅲ～Ⅳ级不良反应的预测价值。结果 72例MM患者均实施枸橼酸伊沙佐米治疗,总有效率为80.55%;出现不良反应70例、以乏力占比最高,发生率为72.22%,其次为淋巴细胞降低25.00%、贫血18.06%,未出现任何不良反应2例。Ⅲ～Ⅳ级组Frailty评分高于Ⅰ～Ⅱ级组(P<0.05)。70例出现不良反应患者均随访12个月,其平均生存时间(22.30±2.28)个月。Cox回归分析结果显示,Frailty评分≥2分是MM患者发生Ⅲ～Ⅳ级不良反应的影响因素。ROC曲线分析显示,Frailty评分预测化疗相关Ⅲ～Ⅳ级不良反应AUC值为0.925(95%CI:0.816～1.00...     

老年高血压相关性衰弱的发病机制及运动干预机制的研究进展

随着我国老龄化进程的进一步加剧,衰弱作为常见的老年综合征已成为备受关注的公共卫生问题。高血压与衰弱常共存于老年人,导致出现多种不良健康结局。本文分析了老年高血压相关性衰弱的流行现状及发病机制,包括炎性反应、氧化应激反应、胰岛素抵抗及激素代谢紊乱等,总结了运动干预改善高血压相关性衰弱的可能作用途径,并发现目前关于高血压相关性衰弱的运动作用机制类研究仍然缺乏,而且不同类型的运动干预形式对机体的作用机制也存在一定差异性,未来可以进一步探讨不同的运动干预形式对高血压相关性衰弱的作用靶点及干预效果的不同。     

The Prevalence of Frailty Among Older Adults Living With Dementia: A Systematic Review

ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence of frailty in older adults living with dementia and explore the differences in medication use according to frailty status.DesignSystematic review of published literature from inception to August 20, 2020.Setting and ParticipantsAdults age ≥65 years living with dementia in acute-care, community and residential care settings.MethodsA systematic search was performed in Embase, Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, APA PscyInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened records and conducted quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsSixteen articles met the inclusion criteria, with 7 studies conducted in acute care setting and 9 studies in community-dwelling adults. Five studies recruited people with dementia exclusively, and 11 studies were conducted in older populations that included individuals with dementia diagnosis. Among studies conducted in acute care setting, the prevalence of frailty ranged from 50.8% to 91.8% compared with studies in community-dwelling setting, which reported a prevalence of 24.3% to 98.9%. With respect to medication exposure, 3 studies documented medication use according to frailty status but not dementia status. Higher medications use, measured as total number of medications was reported in frail [7.0 ± 4.0 (SD) ?12.0 ± 9.0 (SD)] compared with nonfrail participants [6.1 ± 3.1(SD) ?10.4 ± 3.8 (SD)].Conclusions and ImplicationsCurrent data suggests a wide range of frailty prevalence in individuals with dementia. Future studies should systematically document frailty in adults living with dementia and its impact on medication use.     

Self-Reported Frailty Screening Tools: Comparing Construct Validity of the Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire and FRAIL

ObjectivesWe examined the construct validity of 2 self-reported frailty questionnaires, the Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire (FPQ) and FRAIL, against the Cardiovascular Health Study frailty phenotype (CHS-FP).DesignCross-sectional data analysis of longitudinal prospective cohort study.Settings and ParticipantsWe included data from 230 older adults (mean age: 67.2 ± 7.4 years) from the “Longitudinal Assessment of Biomarkers for characterization of early Sarcopenia and Osteosarcopenic Obesity in predicting frailty and functional decline in community-dwelling Asian older adults Study” (GeriLABS 2) recruited between December 2017 and March 2019.MethodsWe compared area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), agreement, correlation, and predictive validity against outcome measures [Short Physical Performance Battery, 5 times repeat chair stand (RCS-5), Frenchay activities index, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, life-space assessment, Social Functioning Scale 8 (SFS-8), EuroQol-5 dimensions (utility value)] using logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, and vascular risk factors. We examined concurrent validity across robust versus prefrail/frail for inflammatory blood biomarkers [tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 and C-reactive protein (CRP)] and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition [bone mineral density (BMD); appendicular lean mass index (ALMI), and fat mass index (FMI)].ResultsPrevalence of prefrail/frail was 25.7%, 14.8%, and 48.3% for FPQ, FRAIL, and CHS-FP, respectively. Compared with FRAIL, FPQ had better diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.617 vs 0.531, P = .002; sensitivity = 37.8% vs 18.0%; specificity = 85.6% vs 88.2%) and agreement (AC1-Stat = 0.303 vs 0.197). FPQ showed good predictive validity [RCS-5: odds ratio (OR) 2.38; 95% CI: 1.17–4.86; International Physical Activity Questionnaire: OR 3.62; 95% CI:1.78–7.34; SFS-8: OR 2.11; 95% CI: 1.64–5.89 vs FRAIL: all P > .05]. Only FRAIL showed concurrent validity for CRP, compared with both FPQ and FRAIL for TNF-R1. FRAIL showed better concurrent validity for BMD, FMI, and possibly ALMI, unlike FPQ (all P > .05).Conclusions and ImplicationsOur results support complementary validity of FPQ and FRAIL in independent community-dwelling older adults. FPQ has increased case detection sensitivity with good predictive validity, whereas FRAIL demonstrates concurrent validity for inflammation and body composition. With better diagnostic performance and validity for blood biomarkers and clinical outcomes, FPQ has utility for early frailty detection in the community setting.     

Transitions Between Frailty States and Its Predictors in a Cohort of Community-Dwelling Spaniards

ObjectivesStudy the frequency and determinants of frailty transitions in a community-dwelling older population.DesignPopulation-based prospective longitudinal study [The Toledo Study of Healthy Ageing (TSHA)].Setting and Participants1748 community-dwelling individuals aged >65 years living in Toledo, a Spanish province.MethodsFrailty was measured with the Fried phenotype. Logistic models were used to assess the associations of sociodemographic, clinical, life-habits, functional, physical performance, and analytical variables with frailty transitions (losing robustness, transitioning from prefrailty to robustness, and from prefrailty to frailty) over a median of 5.2 years.ResultsMean age on enrolment was 75 years, and 55.8% were females. At baseline, 10.3% were frail and 43.1% prefrail. At follow-up, 35.8% of the frail individuals recovered to a prefrail and 15.1% to a robust state. In addition, 43.7% of the prefrail participants became robust, but 14.5% developed frailty. Of those robust at baseline, 32.9% became prefrail and 4.2% frail. In multivariate logistic models, chair-stands had a predictive role in all transitions studied: linearly in keeping robustness and with a floor effect (5 stands) in transitions from prefrailty to robustness and (inversely) from prefrailty to frailty. More depressive symptoms were associated with unfavorable transitions. Not declaring the amount of alcohol drunk and low grip strength were associated with loss of robustness. Hearing and cognitive impairment, low physical activity and smoking with transitioning from prefrailty to frailty. Autonomy for instrumental activities of daily living and uricemia were associated with transitions between robustness and prefrailty in both directions. Increasing body mass index in the range of moderate to severe obesity hampered regaining robustness.Conclusions and ImplicationsSpontaneous improvement of frailty measured with the Fried phenotype is frequent, mainly to prefrailty. Most of the variables associated with transitions are modifiable and suggest research topics and interventions to reduce frailty in clinical and social care settings.     

Frailty in Nursing Homes—A Prospective Study Comparing the FRAIL-NH and the Clinical Frailty Scale

ObjectivesFrailty is common in nursing home (NH) residents, but its prevalence in German institutions is unknown. Valid and easy-to-use screening tools are needed to identify frail residents. We used the FRAIL-NH scale and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) to (1) obtain the prevalence of frailty, (2) investigate the agreement between both instruments, and (3) evaluate their predictive validity for adverse health events in German NH residents.DesignProspective cohort study.Setting and participantsGerman NH residents (n = 246, age 84 ± 8 years, 67% female).MethodsFrailty status was categorized according to FRAIL-NH (nonfrail, frail, most frail) and CFS (not frail, mild to moderately frail, severely frail). Agreement between instruments was examined by Spearman correlation, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% CI, and sensitivity and specificity using the “most frail” category of FRAIL-NH as reference standard. Adverse health events (death, hospital admissions, falls) were recorded for 12 months, and multivariate cox and logistic regression models calculated.ResultsAccording to FRAIL-NH, 71.1% were most frail, 26.4% frail, and 2.5% nonfrail. According to CFS, 66.3% were severely frail, 26.8% mild to moderately frail, and 6.9% not frail. Both scales correlated significantly (r = 0.78; R² = 60%). The AUC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.96). Using a CFS cutoff of 7 points, sensitivity was 0.90 and specificity 0.92. The frailest groups according to both instruments had an increased risk of death [FRAIL-NH hazard ratio (HR) 2.19, 95% CI 1.21-3.99; CFS HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.43-4.58] and hospital admission [FRAIL-NH odds ratio (OR) 1.95, 95% CI 1.06-3.58; CFS OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.01-3.20] compared to less frail residents. The FRAIL-NH predicted recurrent faller status (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.23-5.39).Conclusions and implicationsFrailty is highly prevalent in German NH residents. Both instruments show good agreement despite different approaches and are able to predict adverse health outcomes. Based on our findings and because of its simple administration, CFS may be an alternative to FRAIL-NH for assessing frailty in NHs.     

老年患者胃肠肿瘤根治手术术前衰弱与术后并发症的相关性

目的 探讨老年患者胃肠肿瘤根治手术术前衰弱与术后并发症的相关性。
方法 回顾性分析2018年9月至2021年1月择期全麻下行胃肠肿瘤根治手术的老年患者567例,男416例,女151例,年龄≥65岁,ASA Ⅰ—Ⅴ级。收集患者临床资料及相关临床指标等围术期资料,采用改良衰弱指数（mFI）评估患者术前衰弱状态。根据术后30 d是否发生并发症将患者分为三组：无并发症组,一般并发症组和严重并发症组。收集并记录年龄、ASA分级等围术期相关临床资料。采用Logistic回归分析术后并发症的危险因素。
结果 术后30 d内共有276例（48.7%）患者发生一般并发症,51例（9.0%）患者发生严重并发症。单因素分析显示,与无并发症组比较,一般并发症组和严重并发症组年龄明显增大,ASA Ⅲ或Ⅳ级比例、衰弱比例明显升高（P＜0.05）。Logistic回归分析结果显示术前衰弱是术后30 d内严重并发症的独立危险因素（OR=3.545,95%CI 1.294～9.711,P=0.014）。
结论 术前衰弱是老年患者胃肠肿瘤根治手术术后30 d内发生严重并发症的独立危险因素。