Assessment of US Radiology Residency Program Websites in the COVID-19 Era

ObjectiveTo provide an updated evaluation of radiology residency program websites in light of virtual interviewing during the COVID-19 pandemic and encourage programs to improve the quality of their online website presence.MethodsWe evaluated the websites of 197 US radiology residency programs between November and December 2021 for the presence or absence of 30 metrics. The metrics chosen are those considered important by applicants when choosing a program and have been used in other similar papers.ResultsOf the 197 programs, 192 (97.5%) had working websites. The average radiology residency website had 16 of 30 (54%) metrics listed on their websites. Five programs did not have accessible websites and were not included in the analysis. The most comprehensive website had 29 of 30 (97%) of metrics listed and the least comprehensive website had 2 of 30 (7%). There is a statistically significant difference in website comprehensiveness between top 20 and non–top 20 radiology program websites.ConclusionAlthough radiology residency program websites have generally become more comprehensive over time, there is still room for improvement, especially in times of virtual interviews when residency applicants are becoming more and more reliant on program websites to gain essential information about a program. Some key areas to include are diversity and inclusion initiatives, resident wellness, applicant information, program benefits, and showcase of people in the program.     

2007年首都医学发展科研基金申请书伦理自评及管理状况调查

目的评价2007年首都医学发展科研基金伦理管理现状。方法采用现况调查方法对基金申请标书做描述性分析,评价基金申请人对临床研究伦理问题的认知和基金伦理管理现状。结果652份申请书覆盖北京地区14区2县128家医院。申请者对伦理问题有一定认识的占88．7％;标书中考虑了受试者知情同意的占72．5％;考虑研究工作可能对受试者造成伤害的潜在风险的占62．0％;说明研究工作将保护受试者个人隐私的占49．4％;但进行受益／风险评估的仅有28．7％。三级医院申请者对伦理问题有一定认识的比例（90．2％）高于二级医院和一级医院（84．6％）。教学系统附属医院申请者对伦理问题有一定认识的比例（93．9％）高于军队系统医院（80．2％）。55岁及以上申请者对伦理问题有一定认识的比例（70．0％）低于其他年龄段申请者（89．2％）。描述性研究和病因学研究申请者对伦理问题的认识低于其它类型的研究者。578份申请书填写了医院伦理委员会或科研管理部门伦理审查意见,其中62．6％的填写基本规范。结论2007年北京地区临床研究基金申请者中多数对l临床研究涉及的伦理问题已有初步认识,但认识水平亟需提高。医院伦理委员会或科研管理部门已开始对临床研究基金申请进行伦理审查管理。在临床研究基余中开展伦弹管理的外部条件已初步具备。     

基于PatSnap的我国卒中领域专利发展态势分析

目的 基于智慧芽（PatSnap）专利信息对我国卒中领域专利发展态势进行分析，为有关政府部门、 医药企业和科研机构的决策规划和科技创新工作提供参考。      

Evaluating resident candidates: does closed file review impact faculty ratings?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine faculty ratings of resident candidates in closed and open file conditions. METHODS: Surgical faculty conducted interviews of 70 resident candidates. Interviewers completed an evaluation following a closed file interview then reviewed the candidate's Electronic Residency Application Service file and completed the evaluation again. RESULTS: A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) yielded significant file x familiarity (P < .01), familiarity x attribute (P < .01), and file x familiarity x attribute (P < .05) interactions. Analyses for each attribute revealed consistent findings in ratings of candidates' intelligence, maturity, interpersonal skills, motivation for learning, ability to work with others, qualifications to succeed in surgery, and likelihood to succeed in surgery. Known candidates were rated higher until files were examined. After file review, unknown candidates were seen to be as strong as or stronger than known candidates. CONCLUSION: Interviewers rate known and unknown candidates differently in open and closed file conditions.     

基于生物医药专利的浙江省与4个直辖市对比分析

以生物医药专利数据统计为基础,对浙江省专利申请量、专利类型构成、专利申请人构成、专利IPC分类号分布等方面进行分析,并和北京市、上海市、天津市、重庆市生物医药专利对比分析,再对结果分析解释,以明确浙江省生物医药专利地位。结果表明,浙江省和四个直辖市专利申请量逐年上升,发明专利、企业占主体地位,专利集中在A61、C07、C12分类号。浙江省需进一步发挥区位优势,加强政府引导、产学研合作,促进生物医药领域创新发展。