同型半胱氨酸、维生素D、C、E、B12及叶酸与胃癌关系的研究进展北大核心

胃癌作为临床最常见的肿瘤之一,常因确诊疾病较晚而影响治疗效果,胃镜活检后的病理虽然作为确诊的金标准,但是由于此方式过程痛苦,操作复杂,费用较高,且具有侵入性,可能会导致患者拒绝操作而难普及于临床,因此积极找寻胃癌有效的监测指标十分必要。近年来,很多学者研究维生素与胃癌的相关关系,并试图通过摄取某些维生素降低胃癌发生率,延缓病情及改善预后,也有通过检测血清中维生素的水平给早期胃癌的诊断提供帮助。本文就同型半胱氨酸、维生素D、维生素C、维生素E、维生素B12及叶酸在胃癌中的作用机制,及其在血清中水平与胃癌关系的相关研究进展进行简要综述,为临床胃癌诊疗提供新思路。     

Renal sympathetic denervation in resistant hypertension: The association between vitamin D and positive early response in systolic blood pressure

Aims and objectivesVitamin D deficiency is a common finding and there is a suggested association with hypertension. Resistant hypertension is a clinical problem observed in 5–30% of hypertensive patients. Renal denervation (RDN) has been used for patients with resistant hypertension and has proven to lower blood pressure. Our primary goal was to assess the vitamin D serum concentration as a predictor of blood pressure response to RDN in highly selected patients.MethodsThis prospective, nonrandomized, single-center study included 24 patients treated with RDN. Based on their one-year response after RDN, patients were classified as responders or non-responders at six months or at 12 months.ResultsThe median follow-up was 52 months (range, 14-91 months). After RDN, 17 patients (70.8%) had a reduction >5 mmHg in the mean systolic blood pressure, at the first six months of follow-up. At 12 months, 20 patients (83.3%) were responders. Vitamin D levels at baseline (15.1±4.8 vs. 24.2±8.8 ng/ml) and at six months (16.6±7.2 vs. 25±9.2 ng/ml) were lower in early non-responders compared to early responders (p=0.008), without significant variation during follow-up. Even though Vitamin D levels were lower in the total responder's group, no statistically significant differences were found (p=ns).ConclusionIn patients with resistant hypertension, low vitamin D concentrations were associated with an absence of early response to RDN.     

注意缺陷多动障碍患儿血清25（OH）D及微量元素表达水平及临床意义

目的 探究注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患儿血清25羟基维生素D[25(OH)D]、微量元素表达水平及临床意义。方法 选取2019年4月至2020年11月本院诊治的84例ADHD患儿进行研究(ADHD组),依据ADHD分型标准将患儿分为注意缺陷为主型组(28例)、多动为主型组(33例)、混合型组(23例),并选取同期84例体检健康儿童进行对照研究(对照组)。采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法检测所有受试儿童血清25(OH)D水平；检测血清铁(Fe)、磷(P)、镁(Mg)、钙(Ca)、铜(Cu)、锌(Zn)、铅(Pb)水平；Pearson法分析ADHD患儿血清25(OH)D水平与Cu、Zn、Pb水平的相关性；Logistic回归分析ADHD发生的影响因素；受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析血清25(OH)D、Zn、Pb水平对ADHD的诊断价值。结果 ADHD组血清25(OH)D、Cu、Zn水平均显著低于对照组(P<0.05),Pb水平显著高于对照组(P<0.05)；注意缺陷为主型组、多动为主型组、混合型组患儿血清25(OH)D、Fe、P、Mg、Ca、Cu、Zn、Pb水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；ADHD患儿血清25(OH)D水平与Cu、Zn水平均呈正相关(P<0.05),与Pb水平呈负相关(P<0.05)；25(OH)D、Zn是影响ADHD发生的保护因素(P＜0.05),Pb是影响ADHD发生的危险因素(P＜0.05)；血清25(OH)D、Zn、Pb水平诊断ADHD的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.773、0.770、0.772,截断值分别为21.01 ng/mL、16.05 μmol/L、50.69 μg/L,相应灵敏度分别为82.1%、77.4%、63.1%,特异度分别为67.9%、71.4%、88.1%；三者联合诊断ADHD的AUC为0.883,其灵敏度、特异度分别为81.0%、81.0%。结论 ADHD患儿血清25(OH)D、Cu、Zn水平降低,Pb水平升高,25(OH)D、微量元素水平与ADHD患儿类型无关,25(OH)D、Zn、Pb联合有助于临床筛查ADHD患儿。     

Interpretation,pitfalls of biomarkers in diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases

BackgroundInvasive Fungal Diseases (IFD), account for high morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised and seriously ill patients worldwide. Early, faster and accurate diagnosis with timely and appropriate patient management is critical for improved patient outcome and antifungal stewardship. Clinical/radiological presentations in IFD are non-specific and microscopy/culture based tests have low sensitivity and long turnaround time. Biomarkers have clinical utility for diagnosing IFD but their interpretation is not straight forward.ObjectivesThis review discusses the salient characteristics, clinical usefulness and limitations of common biomarkers such as Galactomannan (GM), 1–3, β D glucan (βDG), mannan, anti-mannan antibody (Mn/antiMn), Cryptococcal antigen test (CrAg), Nucleic Acid Amplification (NAA) tests and next generation sequencing for diagnosing IFD.ContentsFungal biomarkers are useful adjuncts as screening and diagnostic tools for IFD and are much more suited for ‘ruling out’ rather than ‘ruling in’ disease. GM, NAA tests are promising biomarkers for screening of invasive Aspergillosis in high risk asymptomatic patients who are not on antifungal therapy and for diagnosis of breakthrough infections in symptomatic patients. 1–3, β D glucan has limitations both as a ‘rule in’ and ‘rule out’ test and is useful in only specific clinical settings. Two consecutive positive 1-3-βDG tests or combined positivity with GM increases its specificity. Mn/antiMn, T2Candida nano diagnostic panel are promising candidates for diagnosing invasive candidiasis. Combining two or more biomarkers improves the sensitivity for prompt initiation of antifungal therapy and the negative predictive value for suspension of empirical treatment.Serum CrAg test is a good ‘rule in’ rather than a ‘rule out’ test in immunocompetent patients but has good diagnostic accuracy in immunocompromised patients. Detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms by next generation sequencing is useful for fungal characterization and identification of host determinants responsible for increased susceptibility to fungal infections but is still in experimental stages.