Safety and immunogenicity of NVX-CoV2373 (TAK-019) vaccine in healthy Japanese adults: Interim report of a phase I/II randomized controlled trial

BackgroundWe evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of NVX-CoV2373, a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nanoparticle vaccine, in healthy Japanese participants.MethodsThis phase 1/2, randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Japan (two sites), enrolled healthy Japanese adults aged ≥ 20 years with no history/risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and no prior exposure to other approved/investigational SARS-CoV-2 vaccines or treatments. Participants were stratified by age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years) and randomized to receive two doses of either NVX-CoV2373 (5 μg SARS-CoV-2 rS; 50 μg Matrix-M1) or placebo, 21 days apart. Primary outcomes were safety and immunogenicity assessed by serum IgG antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 rS protein on day 36. Herein, we report the primary data analysis at 4 weeks after the second dose, ahead of 12-month follow-up completion (data cut-off: 8 May 2021).ResultsBetween 12 February 2021 and 17 March 2021, 326 subjects were screened, and 200 participants enrolled and randomized: NVX-CoV2373, n = 150; placebo, n = 50. Solicited adverse events (AEs) through 7 days after each injection occurred in 121/150 (80.7%) and 11/50 (22.0%) participants in the NVX-CoV2373 and placebo arms, respectively. In the NVX-CoV2373 arm, tenderness and injection site pain were the most frequently reported solicited AEs after each vaccination, irrespective of age. Robust immune responses occurred with NVX-CoV2373 (n = 150) by day 36: IgG geometric mean fold rise (95% confidence interval) 259 (219, 306); seroconversion rate 100% (97.6, 100). No such response occurred with placebo (n = 49).ConclusionTwo doses of NVX-CoV2373 given with a 21-day interval demonstrated acceptable safety and induced robust anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in healthy Japanese adults. Funding: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04712110.     

Evolution of left-sided thoracoscopic approach for long gap esophageal atresia repair

BackgroundLeft-sided repair for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) has been described for patients with a large leftward upper pouch, no thoracic tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) nor tracheobronchomalacia (TBM), or as salvage plan after prior failed right-sided repair. We describe our experience with left-sided MIS traction induced growth process.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent Foker process for LGEA at two institutions between December 2016 and November 2021. Patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and outcomes were reviewed.Results71 patients underwent Foker process. Of 34 MIS cases, 28 patients (82%) underwent left-sided repair (median gap length 5 cm) at median age 4 months with median 3 (range 2–8) operations and median 13.5 (IQR 11–21) days on traction until esophageal anastomosis. 9 patients (32%) underwent completely MIS approach, whereas 5 patients (18%) converted to open at first operation and 14 patients (50%) converted to open later in the traction process. Traction was internal in 68%, external in 11%, and combination in 21%. Median follow-up was 15.4 (IQR 7.5–31.7) months after anastomosis. 14% had anastomotic leak managed with antibiotics and/or esophageal vacuum therapy. Median number of esophageal dilations was 3.5 (range 0–13). 18% required stricture resection. 39% underwent Nissen fundoplication. None have needed esophageal replacement.ConclusionsFor multiple reasons including the tendency of both esophageal pouches to have a leftward bias, less tracheal compression by upper pouch, and clean field of surgery for reoperative cases, we now more commonly use left-sided approach for MIS LGEA repair compared to right side, regardless of left aortic arch.Level of evidenceLevel IV Treatment Study.     

一测多评法同时测定艾纳香油中5种成分

目的建立一测多评法同时测定艾纳香Blumea balsamifera(L.)DC.油中β⁃蒎烯、β⁃石竹烯、樟脑、α⁃石竹烯和龙脑5种成分的含有量。方法艾纳香油乙酸乙酯提取物的分析采用PEG⁃20 M柱(30 m×0.32 mm,1.0μm);程序升温;载气为高纯氮气(99.999%);FID检测器温度240℃,进样口温度240℃。以龙脑为内标,计算其他4种成分的相对校正因子,再测定其含有量。结果蒎烯、β⁃石竹烯、樟脑、α⁃石竹烯和龙脑分别在1.49~59.5μg/mL(r=0.9996)、2.22~88.8μg/mL(r=0.9996)、6.48~259μg/mL(r=0.9997)、3.64~146μg/mL(r=0.9991)和16.4~656μg/mL(r=0.9998)范围内线性关系良好,平均加样回收率(RSD)分别为97.4%(0.9%)、99.0%(1.3%)、98.9%(0.9%)、97.6%(0.9%)和99.7%(1.0%)。一测多评法所得结果接近于外标法。结论该方法准确稳定,重复性好,可用于艾纳香油的质量控制。     

针对目前已注册的上市中成药治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎临床研究分析＊

本研究系统分析了中成药治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎临床研究方案注册信息，以提高相关临床研究设计质量，以及为中成药上市后评价提供参考和建议。对中国临床试验注册中心网站（www.chictr.org.cn）和美国临床试验注册中心网站（clinicaltrials.gov）进行检索，以新型肺炎、COVID-19、中成药等为检索词，检索新型冠状病毒肺炎中成药相关临床研究方案。按照纳排标准筛选临床研究，并提取注册号、研究题目、研究设计及类型、干预措施等数据，采用描述性分析方法对纳入研究的注册信息进行分析。共纳入新型冠状病毒肺炎中成药相关研究方案35个，其中涉及的8种中成药是新冠肺炎诊疗方案（第七版）中所推荐使用的药物。评价的干预措施共涉及23种中成药（如血必净注射液、喜炎平注射液、连花清瘟胶囊/颗粒等）。主要疗效指标以退热时间、疾病痊愈时间/有效率等为主。结果显示：中成药治疗新冠肺炎的临床研究响应快速，目前已注册多个临床研究，包括疾病诊治、预防全过程。但也存在问题，如研究人群不明确、评价指标代表性差等，相关研究设计和实施尚有待优化，以进一步提高临床试验研究的可行性，以期为当前和后续更多的临床研究方案提供参考。     

Use of Alternative Designs and Data Sources for Pediatric Trials

Abstract

Children are considered a vulnerable group and as such are granted additional protection as research subjects. Research projects using children as research subjects are justifiable if the answer to the scientific question of the study cannot be obtained by enrolling adult subjects (cf. scientific necessity). Thus, there is an ethical obligation to explore innovative analytical strategies that seek balance between the feasibility of conducting a trial and maximizing the utilization of data on efficacy and safety. On this note, there is enthusiasm for implementing some less popular but efficient alternative designs for confirmatory pediatric trials. Within the pediatric extrapolation paradigm, examples of such designs, other than purely based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data, are described in this article along with their advantages and disadvantages. This article will also discuss how to incorporate alternative data sources in the analysis of pediatric clinical trials. A discussion of existing approaches and a road-map to their utilization will be provided. Real case examples on the use of the approaches are provided.     

Long noncoding RNA actin filament‐associated protein 1 antisense RNA 1 promotes malignant phenotype through binding with lysine‐specific demethylase 1 and repressing HMG box‐containing protein 1 in non‐small‐cell lung cancer

The number of documented long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) has dramatically increased, and their biological functions and underlying mechanisms in pathological processes, especially cancer, remain to be elucidated. Actin filament‐associated protein 1 antisense RNA 1 (AFAP1‐AS1) is a 6810‐nt lncRNA located on chromosome 4p16.1 that was first reported to be upregulated in esophageal adenocarcinoma tissues and cell lines. Here we reported that AFAP1‐AS1, recruiting and binding to lysine‐specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), was generally overexpressed in human non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues using quantitative real‐time PCR. Higher AFAP1‐AS1 expression was significantly correlated with larger tumor size (P = .008), lymph node metastasis (P = .025), higher TNM stage (P = .024), and worse overall survival in NSCLC patients. In vitro experiments revealed that AFAP1‐AS1 downregulation inhibited cell migration and induced apoptosis; AFAP1‐AS1 knockdown also hindered tumorigenesis in vivo. Moreover, mechanistic investigations including RNA immunoprecipitation and ChIP assays validated that AFAP1‐AS1 repressed HMG box‐containing protein 1 (HBP1) expression by recruiting LSD1 to the HBP1 promoter regions in PC‐9 and H1975 cells. Furthermore, HBP1 functions as a tumor suppressor, and its ectopic expression hindered cell proliferation. Rescue assays determined that the oncogenic effect of AFAP1‐AS1 is partially dependent on the epigenetic silencing of HBP1. In conclusion, our results indicate that AFAP1‐AS1 is carcinogenic and that the AFAP1‐AS1/LSD1/HBP1 axis could constitute a new therapeutic direction for NSCLC.     

Analysis of Interventional Clinical Research Protocols Related to Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Future Expectations

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID?19) is a newly emerging infectious disease.After its outbreak, researchersstarted a large number of clinical interventional studies, using a variety of interventions to study the different types of COVID?19 cases. In this article, we searched the websites of Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, etc., to study the publicly registered research information. Through the classification and summary of interventional methods, evaluation indicators, research design, etc., this article provided readers with the outline of clinical research about COVID?19, and looked forward to the scientificity, feasibility, and future evidence of the clinical researches.     

Long‐term therapy of multiple basal cell carcinomas: Clinicodermoscopic score for monitoring of intermittent vismodegib treatment

Vismodegib treatment of multiple basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) is limited by adverse effects and high relapse rates: intermittent regimens are therefore preferred for long‐term administration. The objective of this study was to investigate clinical and dermoscopic changes in BCCs during long‐term intermittent treatment and to identify those most indicative of tumor persistence/clearing. Clinical and dermoscopic images (n = 380 each) of 38 BCCs were acquired at 10 observation times (t0–t9). Biopsies were performed at baseline (t0) and after 72 weeks of treatment (t9). All images were evaluated retrospectively by experts who assessed the presence/absence of 12 clinical and 14 dermoscopic features: clinical scores (CScs) and dermoscopic scores (DScs) were then calculated.