AIMS: To compare long-term (1 year) efficacy and safety of pioglitazone and gliclazide in patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This was a double-blind, multicentre, comparative, parallel group trial in 283 patients with Type 2 diabetes, who were randomized to receive 1-year treatment with pioglitazone 30-45 mg/day or gliclazide 80-320 mg/day. Drug dose was titrated on the basis of self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) measurements and HbA1c values. The 1-year changes in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin, HOMA-S (HOmeostatic Model Assessment) and SMBG were compared. In a subgroup of patients (n = 10), systemic glucose production and utilization were determined by a combination of isotopic (deuterated glucose) and clamp techniques. RESULTS: In both groups, there were similar decreases in HbA1c (pioglitazone: -0.79%; gliclazide: -0.79%) and FBG (pioglitazone: -1.0 mmol/l; gliclazide: -0.7 mmol/l), whereas the slope of the reduction of fasting blood glucose was different between groups (P = 0.004). Insulin levels as well as insulin resistance assessed using HOMA-S decreased significantly only after pioglitazone treatment (-11.94 pmol/l and -1.03, respectively, both P = 0.002 vs. baseline). A significantly greater reduction in systemic glucose production was observed in the pioglitazone group (-2.48 micromol/kg/min, P = 0.042) than in the gliclazide group (-1.02 micromol/kg/min). A few, mild adverse events occurred in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A comparable decrease in HbA1c and FBG was observed with pioglitazone and gliclazide. However, with pioglitazone there was a continuous decrease in FBG over 1 year, whereas gliclazide failed to maintain a similar trend. This favourable effect of pioglitazone was due to its insulin-sensitizing effect and ability to decrease systemic glucose production. 相似文献
Introduction: Current treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is limited to symptomatic dopaminergic therapy, while no interventions have been shown to slow down disease progression.
Areas covered: The following article highlights a group of PPAR-γ agonists called thiazolidinediones (TZDs), which are currently being tested for a putative disease-modifying benefit in PD, using pioglitazone as a prototypic compound. PPAR-γ is highly expressed in neurons of the substantia nigra and CNS immune cells. Preclinical data in rodent and primate support an effect of TZDs in preventing and/or arresting neurodegeneration and development of motor symptoms. Although no data on the neuroprotective effect of TZDs is currently available, a clinical trial is ongoing where the primary objective is to assess pioglitazone’s impact on the progression of PD. The trial is also evaluating the drug’s safety concerns.
Expert opinion: The efficacy data from clinical trials must be carefully weighed against the safety concerns. However, given the solid preclinical data, and since the safety data are not yet fully conclusive and limited to the diabetic population, PPAR-γ research in PD can continue with caution. Ideally, drug discovery and development efforts will lead to the identification of new compounds with reduced risk of peripheral side effects. 相似文献