How is safety of dermatology drugs assessed: trials,registries, and spontaneous reporting

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Skin conditions are common and highly varied in their etiology; therefore, a diverse array of therapeutics are utilized. Drug safety studies in dermatology can be challenging as there are over 3000 diagnoses to consider. As a result, dermatologists rely on data from multiple sources including clinical trials and real-world evidence.

Areas covered: In this review, we cover the main sources of safety data available, their strengths and weaknesses and how dermatologists should utilize such data. We use real-world examples of the different types of adverse events reported and how they are best captured by either randomized controlled trials or post-marketing pharmacovigilance methods. With multiple new therapies in dermatology, such as dupilumab for atopic dermatitis and janus-kinase inhibitors for alopecia areata the specialty is awash with evolving high-level evidence for their use. It is important to understand the optimal way to assess safety from trials but also appreciate the need for ongoing capture of safety data in clinical practice.

Expert opinion: In dermatology, there is a plethora of conditions to treat and clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance, such as drug registries and spontaneous reporting, all enable dermatologists to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the safety profiles of drugs being used.     

Adverse drug reaction reporting in institutions across six Chinese provinces: a cross-sectional study

Background: Although China’s adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting and monitoring has developed rapidly, many challenges remain. This study assessed ADR monitoring and reporting in China and identified monitoring problems.

Research design and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted of ADR reporting institutions in six Chinese provinces in April–December 2014. Questionnaires assessed ADR systems, basic resources, and pharmacovigilance activity.

Results: Of 720 questionnaires distributed, the response rate was 81.8%. About 93% (n = 371) of pharmaceutical companies and medical institutions had established ADR monitoring departments/units. Few institutions (26%, n = 104) allocated an ADR budget; 7% (n = 30) had received ADR monitoring funding in the last year (2013). Almost all institutions (99%, n = 555) had computers and 47% (n = 263) had a network database. Many institutions conducted public education about drug safety (49%, n = 283), medicine utilization reviews/quality surveys (28%, n = 158), and medicine consultation services (88%, n = 511). Institutions in eastern, central, and western China differed significantly on implementation of existing regulations and pharmacovigilance activities.

Conclusions: The institutions surveyed have established ADR monitoring systems. However, these systems have flaws. Urgent improvements are needed in funding, basic resources, reporting processes, and other pharmacovigilance activities.     

Hematological toxicities in immune checkpoint inhibitors: A pharmacovigilance study from 2014 to 2019

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown remarkable clinical effects in many cancer types. However, ICIs could also induce severe organ system toxicities, including those of the hematological system. The present study aimed to extensively characterize the hematological toxicities of ICIs immunotherapy. Data were extracted from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2019. Disproportionality analysis, including information component (IC) and reporting odds ratio (ROR), was used to detect potential disproportionality signal. The lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval of IC (IC₀₂₅) exceeding zero or that of ROR (ROR₀₂₅) exceeding one was considered statistically significant for detecting disproportionality signal. A total of 29 294 335 records were extracted from the database, with 132 573 related to ICIs. Overall, hematological adverse events (AEs) were more frequently reported in ICIs (IC₀₂₅: 0.81; ROR₀₂₅: 1.80). On further analysis, hematological AEs were overreported in female patients (female vs male, ROR₀₂₅: 1.04) and anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy groups (anti-CTLA-4 vs anti-PD-1, ROR₀₂₅: 1.33) and polytherapy groups (polytherapy vs monotherapy, ROR: 1.20, ROR₀₂₅: 1.11). Moreover, class-specific hematological AEs were also detected and differed in unique ICI regimens. Notably, disseminated intravascular coagulation had the highest proportion of death outcomes among the top 10 most frequently reported ICI-associated hematological AEs. Our study shows a high reporting frequency of hematological AEs induced by ICI monotherapy (especially by anti-CTLA-4 therapy) and reinforced by polytherapy. A spectrum of class-specific disproportionality signal was also detected; some were fatal and reported for the first time. The heterogeneous clinical spectrum of hematological toxicities, including the non-negligible proportion of death as reported outcome, are warranted to be reminded by clinicians. Early recognition and management of ICI-related hematological AEs are highly important and further studies are needed to confirm the results of our study.     

Drug-induced vitiligo: a case/non-case study in Vigibase®, the WHO pharmacovigilance database

Vitiligo is a common depigmenting disorder ensuing the loss of epidermal melanocytes. It is a multifactorial disease with immunological, genetic and environmental factors including drug exposure. The purpose of the study was to investigate the drugs and therapeutic subclasses associated with vitiligo occurrence reported in VigiBase^®, the WHO pharmacovigilance database. A case/non-case study was carried out by defining cases as vitiligo reports and non-cases as all other reports. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated for the ‘suspected’ drugs and drug classes according to ATC level 4. During the study period, 741 cases of vitiligo were registered. Mean age was 49 ± 20 years. The disproportionality analysis showed an association between vitiligo and pembrolizumab (ROR 116.9, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 94.8, 144.3), nivolumab (ROR 22.6, 95% CI 15.8, 32.4), ipilimumab (ROR 41.7, 95% CI 25.0, 69.7), imiquimod (ROR 152.8, 95% CI 103.0, 226.7), adalimumab (ROR 3.8, 95% CI 2.5,5.8), infliximab (ROR 2.6, 95% CI 1.65, 4.01), alemtuzumab (ROR 27.8, 95% CI 17.6, 43.9), and ustekinumab (ROR 9.3, 95% CI 5.6, 15.6). Concerning the pharmacological classes ATC level 4, a significant association was found with monoclonal antibodies, interferons, selective immunosuppressants, TNF-alpha inhibitors, interleukin inhibitors, and topical antivirals. This study confirmed the expected associations between vitiligo and immune checkpoint inhibitors and strengthened the emerging signal about the association between vitiligo and imiquimod, TNF-alpha inhibitors and interferons. New signals were shown with selective immunosuppressants including alemtuzumab and interleukin inhibitors.