Niacin Toxicity Resulting from Urine Drug Test Evasion

Background: Niacin, a well-established agent for treating dyslipidemia, has been promoted on the Internet as a method for passing urine drug screening, although there are no data to support its use for this purpose. In a handful of cases, this practice has resulted in serious niacin toxicity. Objectives: The aim of this article is to describe a unique clinical presentation of niacin toxicity. Case Report: A 23-year-old previously healthy man presented to an Emergency Department with altered mental status, fever, acute renal failure, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and coagulopathy. It was revealed that he had taken approximately 22.5 g of sustained-release niacin over the preceding 48 h in an attempt to pass a pre-employment urine drug screen. After a complicated hospital course that included mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure and hemodialysis for acute renal failure, the patient made a full recovery and was discharged 10 days after his initial presentation. Conclusion: After a massive niacin overdose, the young man in this case presented with a complex clinical picture that mimicked concurrent thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Although this patient was fortunate to make a full recovery, the case highlights the potential for multi-system toxicity with niacin overdose, and the potential for harm posed by medical misinformation on the Internet.     

An open-label comparison of the effects of simvastatin and niacin alone and combined on the lipid profile and lipoprotein (a) level in an Indian population with dyslipidemia

Abstract

Background:

Patients with dyslipidemia often require the use of >1 lipid-altering agent to achieve the target levels recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of simvastatin and niacin alone and combined on the lipid profile and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) level in an Indian population with dyslipidemia.

Methods:

This 12-week, open-label, nonrandomized study was conducted at the Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar (Punjab), India. Patients aged 30 to 70 years with dyslipidemia were eligible. Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups. Group 1 received simvastatin 20 mg/d for 12 weeks. Group 2 received niacin at doses of 375 mg/d for 1 week, 500 mg/d for 1 week, and 500 mg BID for 10 weeks. Group 3 received simvastatin 10 mg/d plus niacin (375 mg for 1 week and 500 mg for 11 weeks). The lipid profile (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], total cholesterol [TC], and triglycerides [TG]) and Lp(a) were measured before the start of therapy and at 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. Percentage changes from baseline were calculated. Adverse effects (AEs) were recorded at weeks 6 and 12 and through spontaneous reporting.

Results:

Ninety patients were enrolled (50 men, 40 women; 30 patients per treatment group). In group 1, the mean (SD) percentage decrease in LDL-C level at 12 weeks was 42.79% (16.29%) (P < 0.05), but no significant change was seen in group 2 or 3. The mean (SD) percentage increases in HDL-C level were 18.43% (13.28%) and 20.82% (17.57%) in groups 2 and 3, respectively (both, P < 0.05), but no significant change was seen in group 1. TC levels decreased by a mean (SD) of 32.97% (13.66%) in group 1 (P < 0.05), but no significant change was seen in group 2 or 3. TG and Lp(a) levels did not change significantly in any of the 3 treatment groups. Flushing, myalgia, and dyspepsia were the most common AEs in patients receiving niacin.

Conclusions:

In this study in Indian patients with dyslipidemia, simvastatin-niacin combination therapy was associated with greater changes in lipid profile compared with either agent used alone. Niacin was also associated with greater changes in Lp(a) levels. AEs were less prevalent with combination therapy than with niacin alone.Key words: dyslipidemia, simvastatin, niacin, combination therapy     

Statins,fibrates, nicotinic acid,cholesterol absorption inhibitors,anion‐exchange resins,omega‐3 fatty acids: which drugs for which patients?

Classes of lipid lowering drugs differ strongly with respect to the types of lipids or lipoproteins they predominantly affect. Statins inhibit the de-novo synthesis of cholesterol. Consequently, the liver produces less VLDL, and the serum concentration primarily of LDL cholesterol (but, to a lesser extent, also of triglycerides) is lowered. Further, statins somewhat increase HDL cholesterol. There is abundant evidence that statins lower the rate of cardiovascular events. Cardiovascular risk reduction is the better, the lower the LDL cholesterol values achieved with statin therapy are. Some evidence is available that anion exchange resins which also decrease LDL cholesterol decrease vascular risk, too. This is not the case for the ezetimibe, which strongly lowers LDL cholesterol: its potential to decrease vascular risk remains to be proven. In contrast evidence for cardiovascular risk reduction through the mainly triglyceride lowering fibrates as well as for niacin is available. Niacin is the most potent HDL increasing drug currently available and besides increasing HDL cholesterol efficaciously lowers triglycerides and LDL cholesterol. Large ongoing trials address the decisive question whether treatment with fibrates and niacin provides additional cardiovascular risk reduction when given in addition to statin treatment.     

反刍动物烟酸营养研究进展

烟酸在反刍动物能量、蛋白质、脂肪代谢中发挥重要作用.本文对反刍动物瘤胃中烟酸的来源、分布、吸收及合成影响因素的相关主要研究进行了回顾,并综述了近年国内外烟酸对反刍动物营养代谢影响的主要研究进展,最后对今后的研究方向进行了展望,以期为反刍动物生产和研究提供参考.     

Niacin for Stroke Prevention: Evidence and Rationale

Low levels of high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol are associated with increased atherothrombotic events, including stroke. Niacin is a safe and effective means of raising HDL, yet its role in stroke prevention is not well characterized. The purpose of the study is to determine the role of niacin in stroke prevention. A search of the PUBMED database using the keywords niacin, stroke, atherosclerosis, and/or carotid artery was undertaken to identify studies for review. National guidelines from the American Heart Asssociation and National Cholesterol Education Program were reviewed. Treatment of low serum HDL (<40 mg/dL) is an identified goal of dyslipidemic therapy. Niacin is effective in raising HDL levels and reducing cardiovascular events in individuals with high vascular risk and can be used for treatment of stroke patients with low serum HDL. Niacin can be used safely in combination with statins, the first‐line dyslipidemic treatment for secondary stroke risk reduction, with increased efficacy. Studies are needed to better define the role for niacin in secondary stroke prevention. Treatment of stroke patients with extended‐release (ER) of niacin, alone or in combination with statins, should be considered in stroke patients with atherosclerotic mechanisms with low serum HDL‐C levels.     

Targeting mulitple dyslipidemias with fixed combinations – focus on extended release niacin and simvastatin

Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor in the initiation and progression of cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis. Several pharmacological agents have been developed over the past 50 years which target various lipid components such as low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglyceride, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Similar to other risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus, the management of dyslipidemia can be complicated and may require combination therapy for effective treatment. This review discusses the biochemical mechanisms of action and clinical uses for simvastatin (the most widely available and commercially prescribed statin) and niacin, and the combination of these agents in the management and treatment of dyslipidemia.