A matched-pair comparison between bilateral intrafascial and interfascial nerve-sparing techniques in extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

The aim of this study was to validate the advantages of the intrafascial nerve-sparing technique compared with the interfascial nerve-sparing technique in extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. From March 2010 to August 2011, 65 patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) underwent bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. These patients were matched in a 1∶2 ratio to 130 patients with localized PCa who had undergone bilateral interfascial nerve-sparing extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy between January 2008 and August 2011. Operative data and oncological and functional results of both groups were compared. There was no difference in operative data, pathological stages and overall rates of positive surgical margins between the groups. There were 9 and 13 patients lost to follow-up in the intrafascial group and interfascial group, respectively. The intrafascial technique provided earlier recovery of continence at both 3 and 6 months than the interfascial technique. Equal results in terms of continence were found in both groups at 12 months. Better rates of potency at 6 months and 12 months were found in younger patients (age ≤65 years) and overall patients who had undergone the intrafascial nerve-sparing extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Biochemical progression-free survival rates 1 year postoperatively were similar in both groups. Using strict indications, compared with the interfascial nerve-sparing technique, the intrafascial technique provided similar operative outcomes and short-term oncological results, quicker recovery of continence and better potency. The intrafascial nerve-sparing technique is recommended as a preferred approach for young PCa patients who are clinical stages cT1 to cT2a and have normal preoperative potency.     

Post-chemotherapy nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for advanced germ cell tumor

Objective:   To report our experience with post-chemotherapy nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for advanced germ cell tumor (GCT).
Methods:   Between 1994 and 2008, 92 patients with advanced GCT underwent RPLND after multiple treatments with systemic chemotherapy at our institution. A nerve-sparing RPLND was carried out in 78 patients (84.8%; median age 32 years). Of them, 19 had a seminoma and 59 had a non-seminoma.
Results:   Lumbar splanchnic nerves controlling ejaculatory function were macroscopically preserved during RPLND. Bilateral and unilateral lumbar splanchnic nerves were preserved in 40 patients and 38 patients, respectively. Sixty-five patients could be evaluated for ejaculation. Fifty-four patients (83.1%) achieved antegrade ejaculation with a median postoperative interval of 3 months (range: 1–10 months). Twenty-eight patients (28/30: 93.3%) and 26 patients (26/35: 74.3%) undergoing bilateral and unilateral nerve-sparing RPLND had antegrade ejaculation, respectively ( P  = 0.041). Only two patients (2.6%) had mediastinal and retroperitoneal recurrences during a median follow-up of 42 months (range: 1–138 months), respectively. However, these patients were cured by chemotherapy and surgery.
Conclusions:   Post-chemotherapy nerve-sparing RPLND preserves ejaculatory function in the majority of patients with advanced GCT without increasing the risk of local recurrence.     

Ⅲb期睾丸非精原细胞瘤综合治疗1例并文献复习

目的:探讨以BEP方案(顺铂、依托泊苷、博来霉素)化疗和腹腔镜下保留神经的腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(nsLRPLND)为基础的综合疗法治疗临床Ⅲb期睾丸非精原细胞瘤(NSGCT)的临床经验。方法:回顾性报告1例Ⅲb期睾丸NSGCT的临床资料及治疗方法,结合文献进行讨论。结果:化疗顺利,手术成功,围手术期无明显并发症,手术用时175min,术中出血50ml。术后随访6个月,肿瘤无局部复发及远处转移。结论:以BEP方案化疗和nsLRPLND为基础的综合疗法可能成为治疗临床Ⅲb期睾丸NSGCT的方法之一。     

Erectile dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy and its treatment with sildenafil

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively evaluated the erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and the efficacy of sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED) following RRP according to the preoperative erectile function. METHODS: We evaluated 48 Japanese patients who underwent nerve-sparing RRP at the Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan, between January 1996 and December 2001. Erectile function following nerve-sparing RRP was assessed by a simple mailed questionnaire that was constructed for the study. RESULTS: Of the 48 patients, 36 had normal erectile function preoperatively, but for 12, function was not sufficient to penetrate. The overall estimated recovery rates of any degree of erection were 50.6% at 36 months and 94.3% at 60 months. However, that of erection sufficient to penetrate was only 17.7% at 36 months and was only seen in bilateral nerve-sparing patients. Sildenafil was effective in 9 of 13 ED patients (69.2%) in both nerve-sparing groups. When patients were divided according to preoperative erectile function, no difference was found in the efficacy rate between patients with normal function and those with ED. CONCLUSIONS: Even bilateral nerve-sparing RRP can not always guarantee a sufficient erection. However, sildenafil is effective for ED following nerve-sparing RRP regardless of the nerve-sparing procedure or preoperative erectile function. Thus, preoperative function alone, although depending on its severity, may not necessarily be a reason for exclusion from receiving nerve-sparing RRP if patients want to have the operation.     

Impact of unilateral interposition sural nerve graft on the recovery of sexual function after radical prostatectomy in Japanese men: A preliminary study

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of an interposition nerve graft on sexual function after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: This study includes 64 patients, without hormonal therapy, who underwent a radical prostatectomy and intraoperative electrophysiological confirmation of cavernous nerve preservation. Twelve patients underwent a unilateral interposition sural nerve graft (UNG) for the resected neurovascular bundle. Twenty-one and 31 patients underwent bilateral nerve-sparing (BNS) and unilateral nerve-sparing (UNS) surgery without a nerve graft, respectively. As the age of patients was significantly younger in the UNG group than in the other groups, age-matched analysis also was conducted. Sexual function, evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire using the University of California Los Angeles-Prostate Cancer Index, was compared statistically among the three groups. RESULTS: In the age-matched analysis, the postoperative sexual function (SXF) score of the UNG group showed an intermediate level of recovery between those of the BNS and UNS groups at 12 months and reached the same level as the score at 12 months of the BNS group at 18 months postoperatively. The difference in the SXF score between the UNG and UNS groups began to appear after 6 months postoperatively and increased steadily with time. However, the background factors, such as the baseline SXF score, the usage rate of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, and the rate of comorbidities were different between the UNG and UNS groups. CONCLUSIONS: The difference of the SXF score between the UNG and UNS groups increased with time after 6 months postoperatively. However, it might be difficult at present to attribute a better recovery of the SXF score to the nerve graft because of the difference in the background factors between the groups.     

Unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique to preserve the pelvic autonomic nerves while increasing radicality

We performed unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing (UNS or BNS) radical hysterectomies combined with a parametrial excision in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. The parametrial excision technique is characterized by a meticulous sharp dissection of the avascular plane outside the visceral fascia of the uterus and vagina under direct vision, providing an en bloc parametria and ensuring that all regional spread of the disease is contained within negative surgical margins. The aim of this study was to describe this surgical technique and to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and the impact on early bladder function. From February 2005 to November 2006, 32 patients with FIGO stage IB-IIB cervical cancer, who had the tumor of more than 20 mm in diameter, underwent the UNS surgery or BNS surgery. A parametrial excision was performed in all the patients. The surgical procedure was safely completed in all the patients. Though 14 patients had tumor invasion to the parametria, none of the patients had a positive surgical margin in the parametrium. The bladder function of patients in the UNS group immediately after surgery was more damaged than that in the BNS group. However, all the patients in both groups recovered spontaneous voiding with no need of self-catheterization during the perioperative periods. This preliminary study showed that the surgical technique is feasible and safe. For confirmation of the efficacy of this technique, further large prospective studies are needed.     

保留盆腔神经对宫颈癌患者术后生存质量的影响

【摘要】目的探讨腹腔镜下保留盆腔自主神经的广泛子宫切除术(laparoscopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy,LNSRH)对早期宫颈癌患者术后生存质量的影响。方法回顾性分析我院2013年7月至2015年3月收治的70例Ⅰa～Ⅱa 宫颈癌患者的临床资料和随访资料,所有患者均行腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术,其中35例行LNSRH 腹腔镜下盆腔淋巴结清扫(laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy,LPL),为观察组,另35例行腹腔镜下广泛性子宫切除(laparoscopic radical hysterectomy,LRH) LPL,为对照组。术前及术后6月对所有患者进行宫颈癌治疗功能评价系统(FACT-Cx)的问卷调查,评价宫颈癌患者术后近期生活质量。结果术前两组FACT-Cx总评分及各部分得分差异无统计学意义,术后观察组FACT-Cx总评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后各部分评分中除了附加关注得分观察组高于对照组,其余各部分得分两组统计差异无统计学意(P>0.05)。结论保留盆腔自主神经的腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术较传统腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术患者术后有较为理想的生活状态,腹腔镜下保留盆腔神经的宫颈癌根治术可能对提高早期宫颈癌患者术后生活质量有效,值得临床进一步研究。     

盆腹腔自主神经的网络结构及腹腔镜下的解剖与分离

人体的内脏神经系统（包括交感、副交感系统及传入系统）是一个相互关联且十分复杂的完整的网络结构。在保留神经的腹腔镜广泛性子宫切除术中笔者按照网络的概念进行相关神经的解剖、分离与保留。而不应仅仅分离保留几个主要的神经分支，从而更好地达到在完成标准的腹腔镜宫颈癌手术治疗的同时又尽量地减少了术后膀胱功能障碍的发生。     

Various types of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomies and their effects on bladder function

Objective

This study was conducted to ascertain the correlation between preserved pelvic nerve networks and bladder function after laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2011, 53 patients underwent total laparoscopic radical hysterectomies. They were categorized into groups A, B, and C based on the status of preserved pelvic nerve networks: complete preservation of the pelvic nerve plexus (group A, 27 cases); partial preservation (group B, 13 cases); and complete sacrifice (group C, 13 cases). To evaluate bladder function, urodynamic studies were conducted preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

Results

No significant difference in sensory function was found between groups A and B. However, the sensory function of group C was significantly lower than that of the other groups. Group A had significantly better motor function than groups B and C. No significant difference in motor function was found between groups B and C. Results showed that the sensory nerve is distributed predominantly at the dorsal half of the pelvic nerve networks, but the motor nerve is predominantly distributed at the ventral half.

Conclusion

Various types of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomies can be tailored to patients with cervical carcinomas.     

Evaluation of pelvic visceral functions after modified nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy

Background Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy （NSRH） was developed in an attempt to minimize complications after radical hysterectomy.Since 2008,a modified NSRH-nerve plane-sparing radical hysterectomy （NPSRH） has been developed at the Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.The aim of this study was to investigate the role of NPSRH in improving postoperative pelvic visceral dysfunctions.Methods Eighty-three patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics （FIGO） stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer received NPSRH （the study group） from January 2008 to October 2012.One hundred and sixty-six patients who underwent conventional radical hysterectomy （CRH） were randomly selected as the control group.Age,pathological type and stage were matched between the two groups.The safety of surgery was assessed by duration of operation and blood transfusion rate.Postoperative short-term bladder function was analyzed by duration of catheterization.Long-term bladder,anorectal and sexual function were evaluated with questionnaires.Results Seventy-eight patients （94.0%） in the NPSRH group and one hundred and sixty patients （96.4%） in the CRH group completed the study.Median follow-up time was 31.9 months and 31.0 months respectively （P=0.708）.There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age,body mass index,FIGO stage,pathologic type,preoperative and postoperative therapy （P 〉0.05）.The blood transfusion rate shared no difference between two groups （P=0.364）.The operation time in the NPSRH group was significantly longer than CRH group （P 〈0.01）.But the duration of catheterization and hospitalization in the NPSRH group was significantly reduced compared with CRH group （P 〈0.01）.In addition,the incidence of long-term urinary frequency,urinary incontinence,urinary retention,straining to void,constipation and diarrhea was significantly lower in the NPSRH group （P 〈0.05）.However,there was no significant difference regarding sexual function （P 〉0.05）.Conclusions The current evidence indicated that NPSRH improved long-term bladder function compared to CRH.Moreover,it may improve long-term anorectal function as well.