腰椎棘突间记忆合金动态稳定装置理论验证

为了在腰椎退变性疾病保守治疗和融合手术中间地带寻找一种有效的预防与辅助相结合的微创治疗方式,通过对比目前常用的几种腰椎棘突间动态稳定系统的临床疗效观察和优缺点,以及对腰椎棘突间的生理结构、生物力学和相关数据的分析,在充分了解记忆合金材质的基础上,自行设计研究一种记忆合金材料的新型腰椎棘突间动态固定装置,既能重建腰椎的正常生物力学特性,满足人体脊柱的正常活动,又避免对原有结构的破坏,减少术后并发症的发生,同时也可以优化目前的治疗方法。通过研究,腰椎棘突间记忆合金动态稳定装置在理论上效果满意,可以解决现有技术的不足,优于目前的几种腰椎棘突间动态稳定系统。     

基于患者出射EPID剂量验证的在体调强放疗质控技术研究

背景与目的：调强放疗（intensity-modulated radiation therapy，IMRT）中剂量投照失误可导致严重后果，而目前常用的治疗前计划验证方法并不能反映患者真实投照剂量。实现一种评估患者在体剂量执行准确度的方法，能够在分次治疗中及时发现较大剂量错误，避免发生患者投照剂量过高或不足。方法：复旦大学附属肿瘤医院收治的患者首次实施治疗前行锥形束计算机断层成像（cone beam computed tomography，CBCT）扫描，与定位CT图像进行配准保证治疗体位与模拟定位时一致，实时治疗中使用电子射野影像装置（electronic portal imaging device，EPID）获取患者出射剂量影像，并把首次出射EPID影像作为剩余分次治疗的基准值，后续分次实时治疗野结束后快速将其出射EPID影像与对应基准影像进行γ分析比较，以验证治疗计划是否准确执行于患者身上。设计模体实验对治疗部位错误和摆位误差情况进行分析，来评估本方法识别放疗差错的准确性。结果：本方法可有效地识别出IMRT放疗中患者治疗部位错误和非平行于射野角度方向的摆位误差，但对平行于射野角度方向的摆位误差并不敏感，30例鼻咽癌患者临床应用结果中能够直观显示分次治疗间摆位重复性情况。结论：基于EPID实现的一种在体剂量验证方法能够对调强放疗中患者实时剂量的准确性进行评估，在单个治疗野结束后可快速检测出较大治疗错误。     

Impact of training level on postplacental levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device expulsion

Objective

To determine the association between provider training level and postplacental intrauterine device (IUD) outcomes following insertion instruction by email only.

A pilot study of levonorgestrel concentrations and bleeding patterns in women with epilepsy using a levonorgestrel IUD and treated with antiepileptic drugs

Objectives

We explored levonorgestrel (LNG) concentrations, bleeding patterns and endometrial thickness in women with epilepsy (WWE) initiating an LNG-intrauterine device (IUD) co-administered with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

Impact of training on use of inhalational techniques of different inhaler devices: A single institutional cross sectional observation study

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of training on use of inhalational techniques of different inhaler devices in spirometry proved cases of COPD and Bronchial Asthma in a tertiary care centre.MethodsA total of 128 spirometry proved cases of Asthma and COPD were enrolled. They were equally distributed in four groups comprising of 32 patients each according to their inhalation devices namely pMDI, Rotahaler, Accuhaler and Turbohaler. Patients were asked to demonstrate their inhalation technique and errors were noted according to their inhaler specific checklist. Patients were also interviewed regarding their knowledge about inhalation devices. Training about proper inhalation techniques was given to every participant. Rechecking of inhalation technique was again done at the second visit after 2 wks in the similar manner. Correct and incorrect steps of inhalation technique again evaluated by filling the checklist of the individual device to see post training improvement.ResultIn our study, out of total cases more than one third of the patients were >60 yrs of age (41.4%) and most of the patients were males (62.5%). During the interview at first visit, almost 92% patients claimed to know how to use the inhalation device correctly but in reality most of the patients (around 96.1%) had committed at least one mistakes in their inhalation technique among all the inhalation steps. Errors were noted in different steps of inhalation including the essential steps among all the four devices. Statistically significant improvement in inhalation techniques including the essential steps were found among all the four devices after educational intervention and demonstration of sequential steps involved in particular inhaler.ConclusionOur study confirmed a significant increase in the percentage of improvement in inhalation technique after proper demonstration and training about the inhalation devices. Inhalation technique including essential steps of inhalation significantly improved in all the four devices used.     

Health and economic benefits of advanced pneumatic compression devices in patients with phlebolymphedema

Objective

Phlebolymphedema (chronic venous insufficiency-related lymphedema) is a common and costly condition. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of evidence comparing phlebolymphedema therapeutic interventions. This study sought to examine the medical resource utilization and phlebolymphedema-related cost associated with Flexitouch (FLX; Tactile Medical, Minneapolis, Minn) advanced pneumatic compression devices (APCDs) relative to conservative therapy (CONS) alone, simple pneumatic compression devices (SPCDs), and other APCDs in a representative U.S. population of phlebolymphedema patients.

Utilization and Complications of Central Venous Access Devices in Oncology Patients

Purpose: To describe how central venous access devices (CVADs) are utilized for ambulatory oncology patients and to evaluate the rate of complications. Method: Single institution retrospective study of oncology patients with CVADs who received systemic treatment at the Walker Family Cancer Centre (WFCC) between 1 January and 31 December 2018. Results: A total of 480 CVADS were placed in 305 patients, of which 408 (85%) were peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 72 (15%) were implanted vascular access devices (PORTs). The incidence of early and late complications was 9% and 24%, respectively. For the entire cohort, the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was 16%, of which 9% were CVAD-related thrombosis (CRTs) and 7% were distant VTE. The CRT rates were similar for PICCs and PORTs (9% vs. 7%). A total of 6% of CVADs were complicated by infection (i.e., localized infections and bacteremia), with a total infection rate of 0.43 and 0.26 per 1000 indwelling days for PICCs and PORTs, respectively. The incidence of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) was greater for PICCs than PORTs, at a rate of 0.22 compared with 0.08 per 1000 indwelling days, respectively. The premature catheter removal rate was 26% for PICCs and 18% for PORTs. PORTs required more additional hospital visits. Conclusions: PICCs were utilized more frequently than PORTs and had a higher rate of premature removal. The rates of VTE and CRT were similar for both CVAD types. PORTs had a lower rate of infection per 1000 indwelling days. However, the management of PORT related complications required more visits to the hospital and oncology clinic.