Patient Preferences for Benefits,Risks, and Administration Route of Hypomethylating Agents in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Introduction/BackgroundTherapy with infused or injected hypomethylating agents (HMAs) may lead to higher treatment administration burden (ie, local reaction, visit frequency and duration) vs. oral HMAs. ObjectivesTo reveal preferences of US and Canadian patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) for HMAs’ benefits, risks, and administration burden through an online discrete-choice experiment (DCE).Materials and MethodsChoice of DCE attributes and survey development were informed by literature review and interviews with clinicians, MDS patients, and caregivers serving as patient proxies, and patient advocacy groups (PAGs) representatives, including from AAMAC, AAMDS, and MDSF. DCE choice tasks were analyzed using random parameter logit models. Survey patients were recruited by the PAGs via their networks. To understand key preference drivers and how much patients were willing to trade between attributes, we calculated each attribute's relative attribute importance (RAI) and marginal rates of substitution.ResultsOne hundred eighty-four respondents (including 158 patients; mean age, 67.2 years; male, 50.5%; White, 50.5%; US residents, 88%) completed the survey. MDS risk was low (34.8%), high (30.9%), or unknown (34.2%). RAI (in decreasing order) was as follows: risk of AML (40%), fatigue level (33%), number of visits (12%), mode of administration (6%), visit duration (5%), and administration frequency (4%). Assuming the same risk of AML transformation or level of fatigue, most respondents (76.6%) were predicted to switch to an oral pill if it were available to them.ConclusionGiven equivalent effectiveness across HMAs, patients’ preferences for HMA administration method should be considered in treatment decision-making to minimize burden and facilitate adherence.     

Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients With Cancer: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Patients with active cancer are at an increased risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events. Historically, in patients with cancer, low molecular weight heparins have been preferred for treatment of VTE, whereas warfarin has been the standard anticoagulant for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). More recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been demonstrated to reduce the risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism in large randomized clinical trials of patients with VTE and AF, respectively, thus providing an attractive oral dosing option that does not require routine laboratory monitoring. In this review, we summarize available clinical trial data and guideline recommendations, and outline a practical approach to anticoagulation management of VTE and AF in cancer.     

Venetoclax in AML: Where We Are and Where We Are Headed

The developmental path for venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been rapid and stands in stark contrast to the incremental progress that has characterized the field in previous decades. For perspective, on December 31, 2013, the first AML patient was enrolled into a study using venetoclax; 59 months later, on November 21, 2018, venetoclax received accelerated approval by the FDA for use in AML. In June 2020, Dr. DiNardo presented the results of the required confirmatory study at the European Hematology Association meeting, showing that venetoclax with azacitidine resulted in a superior response rate and overall survival compared to azacitidine alone for older, newly diagnosed AML patients. This swift progress has provided a welcome and potent new therapy for patients with AML; with it come questions about how its role can be expanded, and how its use can be optimized.     

Oxime K074 – in vitro and in silico reactivation of acetylcholinesterase inhibited by nerve agents and pesticides

Abstract

Oxime K074 was formerly considered to be a lead structure for design of novel oximes for reactivation of tabun-inhibited acetylcholinesterase (AChE). In this study, we are summarizing its reactivation activity in case of other nerve agents (sarin, cyclosarin, VX and Russian VX) and pesticides (chlorpyrifos, methylchlorpyrifos and DDVP). For this purpose, standard in vitro method using rat brain homogenate was used. As resulted, oxime K074 was able to reactivate brain ChE (cholinesterases) inhibited by all used nerve agents and pesticides excluding cyclosarin-inhibited ChE. Only slight modification in structure of sarin (isopropyl moiety) and cyclosarin (cyclohexyl moiety) caused extraordinary differences in the reactivation of acetylcholinesterase inhibited by these nerve agents. Obtained molecular docking results suggest that the oxime K074 interacts very well with the inhibitors addressed in this work, and the data obtained by the QM/MM approach showed a good correlation with our experimental results of reactivation rate (%) by the oxime K074.