How do peer support interventions for the self-management of chronic pain,support basic psychological needs? A systematic review and framework synthesis using self-determination theory

ObjectiveTo identify how peer support interventions, for self-management of chronic pain, support basic psychological needs from a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective, using a systematic review.MethodsTen databases were searched for studies reporting qualitative research about peer interactions in pain management interventions. ‘Best fit’ framework synthesis methodology was applied to identify strategies that support the satisfaction of competence, autonomy and motivation. These were matched to definitions of strategies provided by standardised taxonomies.Results18 studies were selected for inclusion. The synthesis resulted in a conceptual model, identifying 12 peer strategies that support psychological needs for self-management of chronic pain; 10 overlapped with existing taxonomies.ConclusionThis was the first known attempt to synthesise evidence about peer support strategies for people living with pain, using SDT as an a priori framework. The model demonstrates commonality between the motivation-promoting processes of peer support and those of other behaviour change interventions and identifies additional unique strategies provided by peers. This systematic classification of peer support strategies provides a means for future study of the efficacy and comprehensiveness of peer interventions.Practice implicationsThe model could assist healthcare professionals and support groups to optimise the potential of peer processes.     

The effect of education given to type 2 diabetic individuals on diabetes self-management and self-efficacy: Randomized controlled trial

AimThis study used a randomized controlled trial design and was carried out to examine the effect of education on diabetes self-management and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes.MethodsThe study was carried out between July 2016–March 2017. Data were collected using information form, Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ), self-efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes (DSS).The individuals in the experimental group were given education. Both groups were reminded about the control time of their metabolic values on the phone in the 3rd and 6th months.ResultsThe average age of the individuals was 59.91 ± 8.93 (n = 78), 62.8% (n = 49) were female, 92.3% (n = 72), were married, 42.3% (n = 33) were high school graduates and their diabetes duration was 7.05 ± 3.9. There was a statistically significant difference in the 6th month metabolic values in the experimental group compared to the control group. When diabetes self-management and self-efficacy were examined, a statistically significant difference was found in the experimental group compared to the control group at 3rd and 6th months (p < 0.05, p < 0.01).ConclusionIn this study, a significant increase in diabetes self-management and self-efficacy and a significant decrease in metabolic values were observed as a result of education and phone reminders given to individuals with type 2 diabetes.     

Factors associated with patient activation in a socially deprived population: Evidence from Germany

ObjectivePatient activation has been identified as a crucial determinant of health, but little is known about its own determinants, particularly in low socioeconomic status populations. To address this research gap, we analyzed factors that might explain variation in patient activation in such a population.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional patient survey (n = 582) in a low socioeconomic status urban district in Germany in 2017. Using multivariate linear regressions, we examined the association between patient activation and a range of psychological, sociodemographic, and health-related factors. To assess the relative importance of these factors, we used dominance analysis.ResultsOur results suggest that age, employment status, linguistic acculturation, health status, and self-efficacy were significantly associated with patient activation. Dominance analysis indicated that self-efficacy was the most important factor explaining variation in patient activation.ConclusionsAge, employment status, linguistic acculturation, health status, and self-efficacy are important determinants of patient activation.Practice implicationsOur results can inform decision makers about approaches for more targeted and effective interventions to improve patient activation in low socioeconomic status populations. Much might be gained by investing in interventions that focus on age, employment status, linguistic acculturation, and health status. Interventions that improve self-efficacy may represent a particularly promising approach.     

自我管理对类风湿性关节炎患者疼痛缓解的效果评价:Meta分析和系统评价

目的:分析自我管理对类风湿性关节炎患者疼痛缓解的效果。方法:通过检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Clinical Trails 5个数据库1980年1月1日至2018年7月31日的文献,按照纳入标准筛选文献后,收集以自我管理对RA患者疼痛缓解研究的随机对照试验,提取所需数据用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入8篇文献,采用Cochrane协作网的“偏倚风险评估”工具对文献质量进行评价,其中6篇文献为A级(低度偏倚),2篇文献为B级(中度偏倚)。Meta分析结果显示,VAS疼痛评分(SMD=-0.32,P=0.50);疼痛自评(SMD=0.10,P=0.65);生命质量评分QoL(SMD=-0.72,P=0.38);健康评估问卷HAQ(MD=-0.12,P=0.31);DAS-28(MD=-0.28,P=0.42。结论:自我管理对RA患者疼痛缓解差异没有统计学意义。其临床及家庭应用价值和意义还需要进一步的证实。     

Apps for pain self-management of older people’s arthritic pain,one size doesn’t fit all: A qualitative study

Introduction Arthritic pain is a major cause of illness and disability among older people. People living with arthritic pain carry out self-management activities to adequately manage their pain. As the trend of smartphone uptake continues to rise among older people, there are opportunities to explore the role of these devices in helping older people better manage their pain. Aim: To explore the attitudes and experiences of older people with chronic arthritic pain towards using an app for their pain selfmanagement. Methods A qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with community-dwelling older Australians living with arthritic pain (n = 16). Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Four themes emerged from the data: (1) Apps are valuable self-management tool, but they do have the potential for harm; (2) A pain self-management app needs to strictly align with the user's needs; (3) Clinician's involvement is crucial when integrating an app into older people's pain selfmanagement regime; and (4) pain self-management app must be designed with enduser in mind. In addition, suggestions on how to make an app more useful and userfriendly were offered by the participants. Discussion While pain self-management apps have the potential to assist older people in their pain self-management process, this modality is not of interest to all older people. Adaptable apps that offer clinician input may be best placed to offer individual level relevance to older users. Future pain selfmanagement app development endeavors should adopt a co-design approach where older people are involved through all stages of design and development.     

Perception du malade chronique chez les professionnels de santé : une évolution marquée par les indicateurs d’évaluation de programmes d’éducation thérapeutique du patient entre 2011 et 2017 au CHU de Clermont-Ferrand,France

BackgroundSince 2010, in France, Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) programs have applied to the Regional Health Agency (RHA) for authorization. Every four years, these programs are mandatorily re-evaluated, and the assessment allows for change in the program management criteria. In our hospital, we studied the evolution of the Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) appraisal benchmarks, otherwise known as “indicators”, in the 17 programs having been authorized and renewed at least once by the RHA.MethodThe TPE program appraisal benchmarks are classified in terms of structure, process and outcomes; program activity itself as well as pedagogic, psychosocial and bioclinical indicators are taken into consideration. We wished to determine the extent to which these indicators were addressed, applied and renewed or created during renewal of the TPE programs. Statistical tests were carried out in order to compare changes in the number of benchmarks in each category before and after the renewal process.ResultsDuring the first authorization, there existed 533 appraisal benchmarks, while they numbered 550 for the second. As for “before-and-after” changes, they consisted in a reduced number of outcome indicators (43.7% to 35.1%), whereas process indicators increased (36.8% to 43.1%) (P = 0.0141). In comparison to the category pertaining to pedagogic, psychosocial and bioclinical indicators, the most widely registered indicator category (55.5%) and the most frequently collected indicator category involved the program activity itself (54.7%) (P < 0.0001), which increased pronouncedly during renewal periods (67.6%) (P = 0.0002). Conversely, the pedagogic and psychosocial indicators were little if at all collected. As regards the latter, there was nevertheless a considerable increase in indicators related to skills and changes favoring health-promoting behaviours. Strictly bioclinical indicators have been largely supplanted by those having to do with the disease evolution, its impact and risk management.ConclusionThe major role assigned to process and structure indicators reflects the fact that they are predominantly structured by RHA requests. Even if this initial study necessitates further research, it highlights a change in the design of educational and psychosocial assessments among caregivers, a change likely to reflect their interest in how patients go about managing their illnesses, (more or less healthy) lifestyles and daily lives.