全文获取类型
收费全文 | 329篇 |
免费 | 18篇 |
专业分类
基础医学 | 1篇 |
口腔科学 | 258篇 |
临床医学 | 7篇 |
内科学 | 1篇 |
外科学 | 7篇 |
综合类 | 56篇 |
预防医学 | 5篇 |
药学 | 12篇 |
出版年
2024年 | 1篇 |
2023年 | 8篇 |
2022年 | 10篇 |
2021年 | 8篇 |
2020年 | 2篇 |
2019年 | 69篇 |
2018年 | 74篇 |
2017年 | 45篇 |
2016年 | 6篇 |
2015年 | 7篇 |
2014年 | 25篇 |
2013年 | 14篇 |
2012年 | 10篇 |
2011年 | 11篇 |
2010年 | 8篇 |
2009年 | 9篇 |
2008年 | 5篇 |
2007年 | 6篇 |
2006年 | 8篇 |
2005年 | 3篇 |
2003年 | 4篇 |
2002年 | 2篇 |
2001年 | 1篇 |
2000年 | 4篇 |
1998年 | 1篇 |
1997年 | 1篇 |
1995年 | 1篇 |
1994年 | 1篇 |
1987年 | 1篇 |
1982年 | 1篇 |
1978年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有347条查询结果,搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
《Saudi Dental Journal》2021,33(7):518-523
ObjectiveOptimal tooth reduction is a key requirement for aesthetics, function, and the longevity of fixed restorations. Research has demonstrated that controlled and conservative tooth preparation is crucial for the long-term success of adhesive restorations. Different techniques of fabricating reduction guides have been previously reported in literature. The present technical note describes the fabrication technique and clinical application of a customized metal preparation reduction guide.Material and methodPatient presented with tilted maxillary left central incisor. The flared-out part of the tooth was modified prior to veneer restoration preparation. Resin pattern reduction guide was fabricated on the diagnostic cast with a window on the tilted mesial portion of the tooth. After intraoral evaluation, resin pattern guide was casted. Metal reduction guide was place intraorally and reduction was provided on the exposed surface of the tooth. After the removal of the tilted portion, a harmonious arch form allowed the clinician to provide adequate evaluation and preparation for veneer restorations.ResultsThe device demonstrated good practical value, allowing for selective and controlled reduction of tooth structure, and definitive protection of adjacent tooth surfaces from iatrogenic damage. The clinical outcome successfully addressed the patient’s restorative and aesthetic needs, and the veneer was stable 2 years postoperatively.ConclusionUse of a metal guide assists clinicians to provide a more predictable reduction of a desired tooth surface, while decreasing the risk of compromising the other/adjacent tooth surfaces. 相似文献
2.
Farhad Tabatabaian Alireza Jafari Mahshid Namdari Minoo Mahshid 《The Journal of prosthetic dentistry》2019,121(2):327-332
Statement of problem
The effects of coping and veneer thickness on the color of zirconia-based restorations are unknown.Purpose
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of coping and veneer thickness on the color of zirconia-based restorations on different implant abutment backgrounds and to define minimum coping and veneer thicknesses for the backgrounds investigated to achieve a target color.Material and methods
Thirty zirconia disk specimens with thicknesses of 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mm and 30 veneering ceramic disk specimens with thicknesses of 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 mm were fabricated. Three backgrounds were prepared: titanium alloy, zirconia ceramic, and base metal alloy. The zirconia specimens were placed on the backgrounds, and the veneering ceramic specimens were located on the zirconia specimens. Spectrophotometric measurements were made to determine CIELab values. Color difference (ΔE) values were calculated to measure color differences between the specimens and the A2 VITA classical shade tab. ΔE values were compared with a perceptibility threshold (ΔE=2.6). Repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni test, and 1-sample t test were used to analyze data (α=.05).Results
Mean ΔE values ranged from 2.0 to 9.8. Coping thickness, veneer thickness, and their combination significantly affected ΔE (P<.001).Conclusions
To achieve the target color with zirconia-based restorations, regardless of the backgrounds tested, the minimum thickness of zirconia coping should be 0.6 mm, and the minimum thickness of veneering ceramic should be 1.2 mm. 相似文献3.
Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo Lemos Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes Marcelo Coelho Goiato Eduardo Piza Pellizzer 《The Journal of prosthetic dentistry》2019,121(5):766-774.e3
Statement of problem
Consensus is lacking regarding the optimal number of implants for supporting complete-arch prostheses with good survival rates and lower prosthetic complications and marginal bone loss.Purpose
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the influence of the number of implants used for complete-arch prostheses with at least 5 years of follow-up.Material and methods
A search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria and was registered in The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42016048468). The following was the population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question: Does the number of implants influence the longevity of complete-arch prostheses?Results
Nineteen studies including 1006 patients with a mean age of 61.44 years were selected for evaluation. The number of implants per jaw ranged between 2 and 9 in the maxilla, mandible, or both jaws. For implant survival rate in complete-arch prostheses with fewer than 5 implants per jaw, the pooled weighted event rate was 1.4% (I2=25.26%; P=.211) and 4.2% (I2=81.35%; P<.001) for complete arches with more than 4 implants per jaw. For the prosthesis survival rate, the pooled weighted event rate for a complete-arch with fewer than 5 implants per jaw was 1.5% (I2=0%; P=.677) and 9% (I2=17.33%; P=.304) for complete arches with more than 4 implants per jaw. For prosthesis complications for complete arches with fewer than 5 implants per jaw, the pooled weighted event rate was 19.9% (I2=93.5%; P<.001) and 24.5% (I2=88.89; P<.001) for complete arches with more than 4 implants per jaw. The mean marginal bone loss for complete arches with fewer than 5 implants per jaw was 1.22 ±0.49 mm (I2=99.46; P<.001) and 1.46 ±0.46 mm (I2=99.6; P <.001) for more than 4 implants per jaw.Conclusions
The current systematic review indicated no relationship of the number of implants used to support a complete-arch prosthesis with implant survival rate, prosthesis survival rate, prosthesis complications, or marginal bone loss in studies with follow-up periods of between 5 and 15 years. 相似文献4.
5.
Jack Goldberg Tiffany Lee Jin-Ho Phark Winston Chee 《The Journal of prosthetic dentistry》2019,121(2):322-326
Statement of problem
Components have been introduced that allow the screw channel of an implant crown to be angled lingually and the screws to be tightened in a non-axial direction to the implant. Information is lacking as to how the removal torque value (RTV) and force to failure (FTF) of these components compare with those of conventional screws.Purpose
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the RTV and FTF values of cyclically loaded implant-supported restorations. Specifically, values for conventional axially tightened gold screws were compared with those for non-axially tightened screws aligned at 3 different angulations.Material and methods
A total of 28 external hexagon implants were embedded in acrylic resin and divided into 4 groups. Simulated restorations were fabricated on abutments capable of different screw channel angulations. Dynamic abutments (DA) were waxed at different angulations and then cast. Simulated restorations were placed on the implants and tightened: group 0GS: 0-degree angulation gold screw tightened to 35 Ncm (control group); group 0DAS, 0-degree angulation with dynamic abutment (DAS) screw; group 20DAS: 20-degree angulation with DA screw; group 28DAS: 28-degree angulation with DAS screw. In groups 0DAS, 20DAS, and 28DAS, the DAS screw was used and tightened to 25 Ncm. Screw removal torque values were recorded by using a digital torque gauge at baseline and, after reaching cyclic fatigue, by using a dual-axis mastication simulator for 1 200 000 cycles. The fracture strength (FS) of the implant restorations was tested under compression until failure by using a universal testing machine. Differences between baseline and removal torque (ΔRT) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed by using 1-way ANOVA for ΔRT and FS separately (α=.05).Results
ΔRT and FS values were not significantly different among the groups (P>.05). The screw fractured in 5 of 28 specimens (17.8%); the remaining specimens failed with fracture of the implant.Conclusions
The removal torque and FS values of the angulated abutment screw were comparable to those of the gold screw. Angulation of the abutment had no significant influence on the screw removal torque values. 相似文献6.
Goran I. Benic Irena Sailer Marco Zeltner Janine N. Gütermann Mutlu Özcan Sven Mühlemann 《The Journal of prosthetic dentistry》2019,121(3):426-431
Statement of problem
Trials comparing the overall performances of digital and conventional workflows in restorative dentistry are lacking.Purpose
The purpose of the third part of this clinical study was to test whether the fit of zirconia 3-unit frameworks for fixed partial dentures fabricated with fully digital workflows differed from that of metal frameworks fabricated with the conventional workflow.Material and methods
In each of 10 participants, 4 fixed-partial-denture frameworks were fabricated for the same abutment teeth according to a randomly generated sequence. Digital workflows were applied for the fabrication of 3 zirconia frameworks with Lava, iTero, and Cerec infiniDent systems. The conventional workflow included a polyether impression, manual waxing, the lost-wax technique, and the casting of a metal framework. The discrepancies between the frameworks and the abutment teeth were registered using the replica technique with polyvinyl siloxane. The dimensions of the marginal discrepancy (Discrepancymarginal) and the internal discrepancy in 4 different regions of interest (Discrepancyshoulder, Discrepancyaxial, Discrepancycusp, and Discrepancyocclusal) were assessed using a light microscope. Post hoc t tests with Bonferroni correction were applied to detect differences (α=.05).Results
Discrepancyshoulder was 96.1 ±61.7 μm for the iTero, 106.9 ±96.0 μm for the Lava, 112.2 ±76.7 μm for the Cerec infiniDent, and 126.5 ±91.0 μm for the conventional workflow. The difference between the iTero and the conventional workflow was statistically significant (P=.029). Discrepancyocclusal was 153.5 ±66.8 μm for the iTero, 203.3 ±127.9 μm for the Lava, 179.7 ±63.1 μm for the Cerec infiniDent, and 148.8 ±66.8 μm for the conventional workflow. Discrepancyocclusal was significantly lower for the conventional workflow than for the Lava and the Cerec infindent workflows (P<.01). The iTero resulted in significantly lower values of Discrepancyocclusal than the Lava and the Cerec infiniDent workflows (P<.01).Conclusions
In terms of framework fit in the region of the shoulder, digitally fabricated zirconia 3-unit frameworks presented similar or better fit than the conventionally fabricated metal frameworks. In the occlusal regions, the conventionally fabricated metal frameworks achieved a more favorable fit than the CAD-CAM zirconia frameworks. 相似文献7.
T.P. Hyde H.L. Craddock J.C. Gray S.H. Pavitt C. Hulme M. Godfrey C. Fernandez N. Navarro-Coy S. Dillon J. Wright S. Brown G. Dukanovic P.A. Brunton 《Journal of dentistry》2014
Objectives
There is continuing demand for non-implant prosthodontic treatment and yet there is a paucity of high quality Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) evidence for best practice. The aim of this research was to provide evidence for best practice in prosthodontic impressions by comparing two impression materials in a double-blind, randomised, crossover, controlled, clinical trial.Methods
Eighty-five patients were recruited, using published eligibility criteria, to the trial at Leeds Dental Institute, UK. Each patient received two sets of dentures; made using either alginate or silicone impressions. Randomisations determined the order of assessment and order of impressions. The primary outcome was patient blinded preference for unadjusted dentures. Secondary outcomes were patient preference for the adjusted dentures, rating of comfort, stability and chewing efficiency, experience of each impression, and an OHIP-EDENT questionnaire.Results
Seventy-eight (91.8%) patients completed the primary assessment. 53(67.9%) patients preferred dentures made from silicone impressions while 14(17.9%) preferred alginate impressions. 4(5.1%) patients found both dentures equally satisfactory and 7 (9.0%) found both equally unsatisfactory. There was a 50% difference in preference rates (in favour of silicone) (95%CI 32.7–67.3%, p < 0.0001).Conclusion
There is significant evidence that dentures made from silicone impressions were preferred by patients.Clinical significance
Given the strength of the clinical findings within this paper, dentists should consider choosing silicone rather than alginate as their material of choice for secondary impressions for complete dentures.Trial Registration: ISRCTN 01528038.This article forms part of a project for which the author (TPH) won the Senior Clinical Unilever Hatton Award of the International Assocation for Dental Research, Capetown, South Africa, June 2014. 相似文献8.
Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapi?o TOLEDO Renata Pilli JóIAS Yves Santini MARQUES-IASI Ana Christina Claro NEVES Sigmar de Mello RODE 《Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB》2014,22(6):516-521
Objectives
Evaluate the thickness and the marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips (OCRS) and a possible correlation between them.Material and Methods
The following OCRS were selected: Accufilm II, BK20, BK21, BK22, BK23, BK28, and BK31. The thickness was measured in three points of the OCRS with an electronic measuring device (TESA), and the mean was calculated. To produce the marks on the strips, composite resin specimens were adapted to a universal testing machine (Versat 2000) with 40 kgf load cell at a speed of 1.0 mm/min. The mark images were photographed with a stereoscopic microscope (Stemi SV11) and processed and analyzed by the 550-Leica Qwin® analyzer.Results
Values (μm) found in the 1st and 2nd thickness measurements were: Accufilm II - 16.4 and 14.2; BK20 - 10.0 and 8.1; BK21 - 9.5 and 8.0; BK22 - 9.7 and 8.7; BK23 - 9.8 and 7.9; BK28 - 12.8 and 10.0; and BK31 - 8.4 and 8.0, respectively. The mean (mm2) values found in the mark areas were: Accufilm II - 0.078; BK20 - 0.035; BK21 - 0.045; BK22 - 0.012; BK23 - 0.022; BK28 - 0.024; and BK31 - 0.024. The results were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis (p<0.05) and Pearson’s correlation tests.Conclusions
Only in the 2nd measurement, the OCRS thickness observed was similar to the value indicated by the manufacturers; the Accufilm II and the BK28 strips showed the better marks; and no correlation was found between the thickness and the marking area. 相似文献9.
目的 探究GLTC[示善(goodwill)、倾听(listening)、交流(talking)、合作(cooperation)]医患沟通模式结合病例导入式教学在口腔修复实践教学中的应用研究。方法 选取2019年7月至2020年7月在四川大学华西口腔医院实习的30名口腔医学本科实习生,按照简单随机数字表法分为对照组(n=15)和观察组(n=15)。对照组采用病例导入式教学,观察组采用GLTC医患沟通模式结合病例导入式教学。评估两组实习生的临床实习成绩(理论成绩、病历分析成绩、操作成绩、讲课成绩)、实习生进行医患沟通的能力、实习生教学主观评价。采用SPSS 22.0软件进行t检验和卡方检验。结果 观察组实习生的理论成绩、病历分析成绩、操作成绩、讲课成绩均优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组实习生的利物浦医生沟通能力评价量表评分高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组实习生教学模式主观评价中提高学习兴趣、集体意识、语言表达能力、综合分析能力、临床操作能力均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 将GLTC医患沟通模式结合病例导入式教学法应用在口腔修复实践教学中效果明显,能有效提升实习生的专业知识和技能,提高教学满意度及医患沟通能力。 相似文献
10.
目的 比较二氧化锆修复体与镍铬合金在口腔修复中的修复效能。方法 回顾性分析2020年6月至2021年6月于杭州口腔医院接受口腔修复治疗的98例患者临床资料,根据修复体材料不同分为二氧化锆组50例,镍铬合金组48例。比较两组患者的修复效果及修复前后的咬合力、咀嚼效率,并比较两组患者修复前后的菌斑指数(plaque index,PLI)、牙龈指数(gingival index,GI)、龈沟出血指数(sulcus bleeding index,SBI)和肿瘤坏死因子–α(tumor necrosis factor–α,TNF–α)、白细胞介素–6(interleukin–6,IL–6)水平,评估两组患者修复后修复体折断和崩瓷情况。结果 二氧化锆组修复优良率高于镍铬合金组(P<0.05)。修复后两组患者的咬合力、咀嚼效率高于修复前(P<0.05),且二氧化锆组咬合力和咀嚼效率均高于镍铬合金组(P<0.05)。修复后二氧化锆组和镍铬合金组PLI、GI、SBI较修复前降低(P<0.05),且二氧化锆组PLI、G、SBI低于镍铬合金组(P<0.05)。修复后两组TNF–α、IL–6较修复前均升高(P<0.05),但修复后二氧化锆组TNF–α、IL–6水平低于镍铬合金组(P<0.05)。二氧化锆组未出现一例修复体折断和崩瓷,镍铬合金组出现3例修复体折断、2例修复体崩瓷。结论 口腔修复患者应用二氧化锆修复体可促进咬合能力和咀嚼功能恢复,缓解龈沟液炎性反应,值得临床广泛推广和应用。 相似文献