26所基层民营口腔诊所医务人员手卫生现况调查

 目的 调查十堰市区基层民营口腔诊所医务人员手卫生现况。方法 2019年9—11月采用便利抽样法对十堰市区民营口腔诊所医务人员手卫生现况进行隐蔽式调查,分析并比较不同岗位类别医务人员的手卫生依从率及正确率。结果 共调查民营口腔诊所26所,设有专用洗手设施的仅17所(占65.38%),配有快速手消毒剂的12所(46.15%)。隐蔽式观察102名医务人员,观察有效手卫生时机2 183次,医务人员实际执行572次,手卫生依从率26.20%,正确率25.52%(146次)。不同岗位类别医务人员的手卫生依从率、正确率比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.001)。护士的手卫生依从率(30.80%)、正确率(31.85%)较其他岗位人员高。医务人员在接触患者体液后的依从率(76.24%)和正确率(40.26%)较其他手卫生时刻高,接触患者前后的手卫生依从率最低,仅为15.38%、24.72%。医务人员不同手卫生时刻的依从率、正确率比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.001)。结论 基层民营口腔诊所医务人员手卫生依从率和正确率均较低,急需相关部门加强对基层民营口腔诊所的手卫生管理。     

口腔科门诊应对新型冠状病毒感染防疫探讨

目前新型冠状病毒感染疫情在全国蔓延，疫情防控成为医院工作的重点。口腔科门诊患者人流量大、口腔疾患多、口腔内病菌种类复杂、诊疗过程中患者无法戴口罩、医务人员的手和器械需要接触患者的唾液、血液、病菌等，特别是在相对封闭的环境中长时间暴露于高浓度气溶胶情况下存在经气溶胶传播的可能。本院口腔科门诊通过开诊前准备、就诊期间应急管理、消毒隔离管理等方面细化防疫措施，成果显著，有效保障医患安全。     

江苏省专科护士工作投入现状及影响因素调查分析

目的 了解江苏省省级专科护士工作投入现状及影响因素，为针对性管理提供参考。方法 采用一般资料调查问卷与专科护士工作投入量表对2 472名省级专科护士进行调查分析。结果 专科护士工作投入总均分为4.06±0.46;多元线性回归分析显示，性别、聘任方式、专科类别、工作类型、出任专科护理门诊、论文发表是专科护士工作投入的影响因素(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论 专科护士工作投入水平较高，其影响因素较多，护理管理者应关注专科护士专业开展现况，采取针对性措施支持专科护理的有效开展，从而进一步提高专科护士的工作投入水平。     

Routine Laboratory Testing Every 4 Versus Every 6 Weeks for Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Quality Improvement Project

1. Download high-res image (408KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

The patient perspective,experience and satisfaction of day case unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A short-term mixed-methods study

BackgroundDay case unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is increasingly being performed worldwide. When performed in the appropriate patient, day case UKA has been demonstrated to be safe, cost effective and improve resource allocation. Limited evidence highlights increased patient satisfaction of day case UKA when compared with inpatient UKA. A detailed study of the patient perspective, experience and satisfaction following day case UKA has not been described before.MethodsA retrospective case series review of 21 consecutive patients (19 unilateral, 2 bilateral) undergoing day case UKA in an elective orthopaedic centre was undertaken. A qualitative and quantitative patient assessment of the day case UKA experience was administered. A five-point Likert scale satisfaction questionnaire, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and open-ended interview was undertaken. The qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis.ResultsOne hundred percent of patients expressed satisfaction (76.2% completely satisfied, 33.8% moderately satisfied) with day case UKA. The majority of patients (90.5%) reported that if they had to undergo UKA again they would prefer a day case over an inpatient procedure. Patients consider surgical outcome, physiotherapy provision, discharge planning, postoperative medications and follow up as key aspects of day case UKA care. One patient was re-admitted following discharge.ConclusionsThe present study demonstrates a high level of patient satisfaction with day case UKA. The results reported herein are subject to the study limitations of sample size, recall bias and inclusion criteria. We recommend that the themes identified by patients are addressed through a multidisciplinary approach with well-defined clinical pathways for a high-quality patient-centred experience.