Treatment of Umbilical Granuloma in Infants With Topical Application of Common Salt: A Scoping Review

BackgroundCommon salt is a safe, effective and cheap home-made remedy for umbilical granuloma. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and summarize the available evidence and examine the research conducted on salt treatment for umbilical granuloma.MethodsA literature search was performed in the second week of September, 2022 using Google scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases using the keywords ‘umbilical granuloma’ and ‘salt treatment’ to identify all English articles pertaining to salt treatment for umbilical granuloma. Tables were made to summarize the methodological characteristics, results and the dosage regimens of salt used by different authors. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used for assessing risk of bias in RCTs. The indexing statuses of the journals publishing these studies were also noted. The overall efficacy with the use of common salt was calculated by adding the success rates mentioned in each study.ResultsTwenty-four articles (2 systematic reviews, 6 Randomized Controlled Trials, 11 prospective cohort studies, 1 case control study, 3 retrospective case series and 1 case report) were included. An overall 93.91% success rate (1033/1100) was seen with common salt application, without any reports of complications/recurrences.ConclusionTopical application of common salt for umbilical granulomas is simple, effective and inexpensive. This scoping review provides a broader outlook at the existing level of evidence and may help in planning interventional comparative studies, so that recommendations can be formulated. It also highlights a lack of properly designed randomized controlled trials on this topic.Level of EvidenceI.     

Prior surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures is associated with increased complications following subsequent reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to compare complication rates between patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after a prior open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for proximal humerus fracture (PHF) to those undergoing RSA as a primary treatment for PHFs, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, or rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA).MethodsPatients who underwent RSA between 2015 and 2020 were identified in the Mariner database. Patients were separated into 3 mutually exclusive groups: (1) RSA for osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tear, or CTA (Control-RSA); (2) RSA as a primary treatment for PHF (PHF-RSA); and (3) RSA for patients with prior ORIF of PHFs (ORIF-RSA). Ninety-day medical and 2-year postoperative surgical complications were identified. In addition, patients in the PHF-RSA group were subdivided into those undergoing RSA for PHF within 3 months of the fracture (acute) vs. those treated greater than 3 months from diagnosis (delayed). Multivariate regression was performed to control for differences in comorbidities and demographics.ResultsA total of 30,824 patients underwent primary RSA for arthritis or CTA, 5389 patients underwent RSA as a primary treatment for a PHF, and 361 patients underwent RSA after ORIF of a PHF. ORIF before RSA was associated with an increased risk of overall revision (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, P = .002), infection (OR 2.40, P < .001), instability (OR 2.43, P < .001), fracture (OR 3.24, P = .001), minor medical complications (OR 1.59, P = .008), and readmission (OR 2.55, P = .001) compared with the Control-RSA cohort. RSA as a primary treatment for PHF was associated with an increased risk of 2-year revision (OR 1.60, P < .001), infection (OR 1.51, P < .001), instability (OR 2.84, P < .001), and fracture (OR 2.54, P < .001) in addition to major medical complications (OR 2.02, P < .001), minor medical complications (OR 1.92, P < .001), 90-day emergency department visits (OR 1.26, P < .001) and 90-day readmission (OR 2.03, P < .001) compared with the Control-RSA cohort. The ORIF-RSA group had an increased risk of periprosthetic infection (OR 1.94, P = .002) when compared with the PHF-RSA cohort. There were no differences in medical or surgical complications in the RSA-PHF cohort between patients treated in an acute or delayed fashion.ConclusionRSA following ORIF of a PHF is associated with increased complications compared with patients undergoing RSA for nonfracture indications. Prior ORIF of a PHF is also an independent risk factor for postoperative infection after RSA compared with patients who undergo RSA as a primary operation for fracture. The timing of RSA as a primary operation for PHF does not appear to impact the rates of postoperative medical and surgical complications.     

腰椎棘突间记忆合金动态稳定装置理论验证

为了在腰椎退变性疾病保守治疗和融合手术中间地带寻找一种有效的预防与辅助相结合的微创治疗方式,通过对比目前常用的几种腰椎棘突间动态稳定系统的临床疗效观察和优缺点,以及对腰椎棘突间的生理结构、生物力学和相关数据的分析,在充分了解记忆合金材质的基础上,自行设计研究一种记忆合金材料的新型腰椎棘突间动态固定装置,既能重建腰椎的正常生物力学特性,满足人体脊柱的正常活动,又避免对原有结构的破坏,减少术后并发症的发生,同时也可以优化目前的治疗方法。通过研究,腰椎棘突间记忆合金动态稳定装置在理论上效果满意,可以解决现有技术的不足,优于目前的几种腰椎棘突间动态稳定系统。     

New approaches to moderate CRISPR-Cas9 activity: Addressing issues of cellular uptake and endosomal escape

1. Download : Download high-res image (81KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Method’s corner: Allergist’s guide to network meta-analysis

Network meta-analyses (NMAs) simultaneously estimate the effects of multiple possible treatment options for a given clinical presentation. For allergists to benefit optimally from NMAs, they must understand the process and be able to interpret the results. Through a worked example published in Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, we summarize how to identify credible NMAs and interpret them with a focus on recent innovations in the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). NMAs build on traditional systematic reviews and meta-analyses that consider only direct paired comparisons by including indirect evidence, thus allowing the simultaneous assessment of the relative effect of all pairs of competing alternatives. Our framework informs clinicians of how to identify credible NMAs and address the certainty of the evidence. Trustworthy NMAs fill a critical gap in providing key inferences using direct and indirect evidence to inform clinical decision making when faced with more than two competing courses of treatment options. This document will help allergists to identify trustworthy NMAs to enhance patient care.     

基于患者出射EPID剂量验证的在体调强放疗质控技术研究

背景与目的：调强放疗（intensity-modulated radiation therapy，IMRT）中剂量投照失误可导致严重后果，而目前常用的治疗前计划验证方法并不能反映患者真实投照剂量。实现一种评估患者在体剂量执行准确度的方法，能够在分次治疗中及时发现较大剂量错误，避免发生患者投照剂量过高或不足。方法：复旦大学附属肿瘤医院收治的患者首次实施治疗前行锥形束计算机断层成像（cone beam computed tomography，CBCT）扫描，与定位CT图像进行配准保证治疗体位与模拟定位时一致，实时治疗中使用电子射野影像装置（electronic portal imaging device，EPID）获取患者出射剂量影像，并把首次出射EPID影像作为剩余分次治疗的基准值，后续分次实时治疗野结束后快速将其出射EPID影像与对应基准影像进行γ分析比较，以验证治疗计划是否准确执行于患者身上。设计模体实验对治疗部位错误和摆位误差情况进行分析，来评估本方法识别放疗差错的准确性。结果：本方法可有效地识别出IMRT放疗中患者治疗部位错误和非平行于射野角度方向的摆位误差，但对平行于射野角度方向的摆位误差并不敏感，30例鼻咽癌患者临床应用结果中能够直观显示分次治疗间摆位重复性情况。结论：基于EPID实现的一种在体剂量验证方法能够对调强放疗中患者实时剂量的准确性进行评估，在单个治疗野结束后可快速检测出较大治疗错误。     

电针傍刺经筋结点治疗缺血性脑卒中急性期上肢偏瘫的临床研究

目的通过观察电针傍次上肢经筋结点治疗缺血性脑卒中急性期上肢偏瘫的临床疗效,探讨电针傍次经筋结点治疗缺血性卒中急性期肢体瘫痪的作用机制。方法60例缺血性卒中急性期偏瘫的患者采用SPSS软件随机数字生成器分为治疗组与对照组各30例。治疗组采用电针傍刺上肢经筋结点治疗,对照组采用电针上肢常规经穴治疗。分别于治疗前后观察评价两组上肢的肌力(MMT徒手肌力评定法)、关节活动度(ROM关节活动度评定法)、运动功能(Fugl-Meyer运动功能评分量表、ARAT上肢动作研究量表)、临床神经功能缺损程度(NIHSS量表)确定疗效。结果两组患者治疗后ROM评分下降,Barthel指数、Fugl-Meyer评分、ARAT评分均上升。治疗组较对照组ROM评分、Barthel指数、Fugl-Meyer评分、ARAT评分改善更优(P<0.05);疗程结束后治疗组肌力经MMT评定后有效率为90%,高于对照组的76.67%(P<0.05);治疗组疗效经神经功能缺损程度评价有效率为93.33%,高于对照组76.67%(P<0.05)。结论电针傍刺经筋结点与常规针刺治疗都可以改善缺血性卒中急性期上肢瘫痪,但电针傍刺经筋结点治疗效果更佳。