米氮平联合奥替溴铵及复合乳酸菌胶囊治疗难治性腹泻型肠易激综合征的疗效观察

目的：观察米氮平联合奥替溴铵及复合乳酸菌胶囊治疗难治性腹泻型肠易激综合征（RIBS-D）的临床疗效。方法：82例RIBS-D患者随机分为试验组（43例）与对照组（39例）,两组均给奥替溴铵及复合乳酸菌胶囊,试验组加服米氮平,对照组加服安慰剂,疗程4周。结果：试验组与对照组的总有效率分别为95.35％、12.82％（P＜0.01）;试验组焦虑及抑郁评分较对照组显著降低,生活质量评分较对照组显著升高,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。结论：米氮平联合奥替溴铵及复合乳酸菌胶囊治疗RIBS-D患者,能明显改善症状、焦虑抑郁状态及生活质量,十分安全。     

米氮平与舍曲林治疗抑郁症对照研究

目的：评价米氮平与舍曲林治疗抑郁症的疗效及安全性。方法90例抑郁症患者随机分为研究组和对照组,每组45例,研究组给予米氮平治疗,对照组给予舍曲林治疗。于治疗前及治疗1、2、4、6周末采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)及临床总体印象量表(CGI-SI)评定临床疗效,副反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果研究组总有效率为86.7%,对照组总有效率为84.4%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组CGI-SI评分较治疗前均有显著下降(P<0.05),但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后两组HAMD评分均较治疗前下降(P<0.05),且研究组治疗第1、2周末HAMD总分和对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其他时点评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组不良反应较对照组更少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论米氮平与舍曲林,总体疗效相当,米氮平起效更快,不良反应更少。     

米氮平联合rTMS治疗伴睡眠障碍的老年焦虑症疗效观察

目的探讨应用米氮平联合经颅重复磁刺激法(rTMS)治疗伴睡眠障碍的老年焦虑症患者的临床效果。方法选取本院收治的200例老年焦虑症伴失眠症的患者依据入院顺序分为联合组(米氮平+rTMS)和对照组(单用米氮平)各100例,2组患者均治疗8周时间,对比临床效果。结果治疗后联合组的PSQI量表7因子(睡眠质量、入睡时间、睡眠时间、睡眠效率、睡眠障碍、催眠药物、日间功能)及PSQI总分均显著低于对照组各因子评分及总分,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后联合组PSG睡眠进程参数(睡眠潜伏期、REM潜伏期、总睡眠时间、睡眠效率、觉醒次数)显著优于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。联合组治疗后SAS评分低于对照组(P0.05)。治疗后联合组愈显率(47.00%)显著高于对照组(32.00%)(P0.05)。结论米氮平+rTMS治疗伴睡眠障碍的老年焦虑症患者较单用米氮平具有更显著的临床效果。     

Rapid improvement in post-infectious gastroparesis symptoms with mirtazapine

We report the case of a 34-year-old woman with severe post-infectious gastroparesis who was transferred from an outside medical facility for a second opinion regarding management.This patient had no prior history of gastrointestinal symptoms.However,in the aftermath of a viral illness,she developed two months of intractable nausea,vomiting,and oral intake intolerance that resulted in numerous hospitalizations for dehydration and electrolyte disturbances.A solid-phase gastric emptying scan had confirmed delayed emptying,confirming gastroparesis.Unfortunately,conventional pro-kinetic agents and numerous anti-emetic drugs provided little or no relief of the patient’s symptoms.At our institution,the patient experienced a cessation of vomiting,reported a significant reduction in nausea,and toler-ated oral intake shortly after taking mirtazapine.Based on mirtazapine’s primary action as a serotonin(5-HT)1a receptor agonist,we infer that this receptor system mediated the clinical improvement through a combination of peripheral and central neural mechanisms.This report highlights the potential utility of 5-HT1a agonists in the management of nausea and vomiting.We conclude that mirtazapine may be effective in treating symptoms associated with non-diabetic gastroparesis that are refractory to conventional therapies.     

度洛西汀联合米氮平治疗肺癌化疗患者抑郁的临床研究

目的研究合并抑郁的肺癌化疗患者应用抗抑郁药物干预后的效果及不良反应。方法分别将经我院心理科医师协助诊断为抑郁的肺癌化疗患者90例随机分成4组:度洛西汀组(22例)、米氮平组(23例)、两药联合组(23例)及对照组(22例),均进行化疗4周期,3周为1个疗程,每个疗程化疗前采用《汉密尔顿抑郁量表》(HAMD)进行评分并比较。结果肺癌化疗患者抑郁患病率46.4%,米氮平组、度洛西汀组及两药联用组患者随治疗时间推移抑郁评分均有所减低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且两药联用组抑郁评分均小于同期其他三组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论肺癌化疗患者抑郁患病率高,度洛西汀及米氮平均有缓解肺癌患者上述情绪的作用,且两药合用效果更显著。     

Mirtazapine premedication: Effect on preoperative anxiety and propofol dose requirements at different stages of hypnosis

BackgroundMirtazapine is an antidepressant drug that blocks central 5-HT2 receptors with anxiolytic and sleep-promoting effects and theoretically can be used as a premedication.MethodsSixty ASA I-II patients aged 25–50 yr were randomly allocated according to the premedication received 2 h before induction of anesthesia into two equal groups: group M patients received mirtazapine 30 mg tablet mixed with 20 ml of water and group P patients received 20 ml of plain water. Anxiety level was measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) and bispectral index (BIS) electrodes were connected before induction of anesthesia. Intravenous (i.v) infusion of propofol 1% at a rate of 300 ml h^?1 was started to induce hypnosis till a target BIS value of 45 (BIS45) is reached, and then endotracheal intubation is performed after fentanyl and cis-atracuruim being administered. Propofol dose requirements to achieve loss of response to verbal contact (RVC), loss of eyelash reflex (ELR), and a target BIS45 were recorded. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane titrated to BIS value of 40–50 and oxygen/air mixture. Recovery time was recorded. In postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), VAS for pain and Ramsay sedation score were recorded. Patients were discharged from PACU when two consecutive Aldrete scores of 9 or 10 are obtained, and time of PACU stay was recorded.ResultsPreoperative anxiety by VAS and propofol doses required achieving loss of RVC and ELR, and target BIS45 were significantly lower in mirtazapine group. The two groups were comparable with regard to recovery and PACU stay times as well as postoperative pain and anxiety.ConclusionMirtazapine 30 mg oral tablets can be used as a premedication as it reduces preoperative anxiety and hypnotic dose requirements of propofol, and does not prolong recovery time.     

九味镇心颗粒联合米氮平治疗对功能性消化不良合并抑郁患者的疗效及安全性分析

目的 探讨九味镇心颗粒联合米氮平治疗功能性消化不良合并抑郁患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法 收集2017年7月～2018年12月于台州市第二人民医院精神科就诊的112例功能性消化不良合并抑郁患者作为观察对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组56例。对照组予米氮平治疗,观察组予九味镇心颗粒联合米氮平治疗。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表17项目(HAMD)进行抑郁临床疗效评价。8周疗程结束后,比较两组的临床疗效、HAMD评分、消化不良症状积分及不良反应。结果 8周疗程结束后,临床疗效显示,观察组治疗总有效率高于对照组(91.1%vs 76.8%,P0.05)。治疗前,对照组和观察组患者HAMD评分比较无统计学差异[(26.5±4.7)分vs (27.3±4.2)分,P0.05)]。治疗后,与对照组比较,观察组患者HAMD评分降低(10.9±2.4分vs 15.8±3.1分),消化不良症状程度积分和频次积分降低[(1.14±0.41)分vs (1.92±0.60)分,(1.02±0.39)分vs (1.83±0.55)分],差异有统计学意义(P均0.05)]。治疗过程中,两组患者均未出现严重不良反应病例。对照组和观察组患者不良反应发生率比较,无统计学差异(21.4%vs 28.6%,P0.05)。结论 九味镇心颗粒联合米氮平是功能性消化不良合并抑郁患者的有效治疗方案,抑郁治疗有效率高,能够明显改善消化不良症状,且药物安全性好。     

米氮平联合艾司西酞普兰治疗卒中后抑郁的临床疗效评价

目的：观察米氮平联合艾司西酞普兰治疗卒中后抑郁的临床效果。方法将符合卒中后抑郁症诊断的脑卒中患者98例随机分为两组,治疗组50例在常规药物治疗及康复训练的基础上加用米氮平联合艾司西酞普兰抗抑郁治疗,对照组48例单采用神经科常规药物治疗及康复训练,两组患者分别在入选时及病程1、3、6个月进行日常生活能力（BI）和汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）评分。结果治疗前两组BI、HAMD评分差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,治疗1、3、6个月后治疗组与对照组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。治疗组HAMD、BI评分于治疗3、6个月后显著改善（P〈0.05）。结论米氮平联合艾司西酞普兰治疗卒中后抑郁具有显著临床疗效。患者抑郁症状改善的同时显著改善患者日常生活能力。     

米氮平与多塞平治疗躯体化障碍的对照研究

目的:观察米氮平对躯体化障碍的疗效和副反应。方法:将60例躯体化障碍患者随机分成米氮平组和多塞平组,治疗8周,用症状自评量表(SCL-90)、临床疗效大体评定量表(CGI)评定疗效,用副反应量表(TESS)评价副反应。结果:治疗8周后,米氮平和多塞平组的疗效相当,米氮平组比多塞平起效快、副反应较小。结论:米氮平治疗躯体化障碍疗效确切,起效快,副反应小,可作为躯体化障碍治疗的首选药物之一。     

米氮平与帕罗西汀联用治疗难治性抑郁症的对照研究

目的:探讨米氮平与帕罗西汀合用治疗难治性抑郁症患者的疗效与不良反应。方法:将84例难治性抑郁症患者随机分为两组,治疗组给予米氮平与帕罗西汀联用,以帕罗西汀单用治疗作为对照组。于入组前及治疗后第2、4、6周进行汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD),社会功能缺陷筛选量表(SDSS),不良反应量表(TESS)评定。结果:6周时治疗组显进率为72.7%,总有效率为86.4%;对照组分别为50.0%、75.0%。研究组显效率与对照组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。研究组HAMA、SDSS评分在6周末减分率与对照组比较均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。TESS评定示不良反应相当(P>0.05)。结论:两药联用治疗难治性抑郁症疗效好,安全性高,且能显著改善患者的社会功能。