排序方式： 共有4条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
2.
William Wang Zhiwei Jiang Jingjun Qiu Xiang Guo 《Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics》2017,27(6):945-962
The primary objective of a multiregional clinical trial (MRCT) is to assess the efficacy of all participating regions and evaluate the probability of applying the overall results to a specific region. The consistency assessment of the target region with the overall results is the most common way of evaluating the efficacy in a specific region. Recently, Huang et al. (2012) proposed an additional trial in the target region to an MRCT to evaluate the efficacy in the target ethnic (TE) population under the framework of simultaneous global drug development program (SGDDP). However, the operating characteristics of this statistical framework were not well considered. Therefore, a nested group sequential program for regional efficacy evaluation is proposed in this paper. It is an extension of Huang’s SGDDP framework and allows interim analysis after MRCT and in the course of local clinical trial (LCT) phase. It is able to well control the family-wise type I error in the program level and enhances the flexibility of the program. In LCT sample size estimation, we introduce virtual trial, which is transformed from the original program by using discounting factor, and an iteration method is employed to calculate the sample size and stopping boundaries of interim analyses. The proposed sample size estimation method is validated in the simulations and the effect of varied weight, effect size of TE population, and design setting is explored. Examples with normal end point, binary end point, and survival end point are shown to illustrate the application of the proposed nested group sequential program. 相似文献
3.
Purpose
Multiregional clinical trials (MRCT) are a standard strategy used to improve global drug approval efficiency and the feasibility of clinical trials. Japan is the world's third largest drug market with a unique health care system, making it a key inclusion as an operational region for MRCT (MRCT-JP) for global drug development. We aimed to identify the factors required for efficient drug development by comprehensively reviewing the clinical trials of drugs approved in Japan to identify the factors associated with whether or not MRCT-JP is implemented.Methods
We surveyed the review reports and summaries of application data published by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. We identified drugs for which the clinical trial data package included MRCT-JP and selected the same number of drugs for which the clinical trial data package did not include MRCT-JP from the most recent survey period for comparison. We also examined other publication information, in addition to the review reports, as necessary. The influence of each explanatory variable was analyzed by logistic regression analysis, with whether or not MRCT-JP was implemented as the explanatory variable. Statistical significance was set at 5%.Findings
In the survey period up to September 2017, 165 drugs developed with MRCT-JP were approved for manufacture and sale in Japan. “Respiratory system,” “inhalation,” “biological drug,” and “under review” evaluation status for the United States, European Union, and other areas, “approved” evaluation status for the United States, “new ingredients,” “priority review,” “non-Japanese firm,” and “Top 1–10” and “Top 11–20” drug sales rankings for pharmaceutical companies were identified as potential factors leading to the implementation of MRCT-JP. In contrast, “general anti-infectives for systemic use,” “various,” “external,” “chemical compound,” “unsubmitted” evaluation status for both the United States and European Union, and “Top 51+” drug sales rankings were potential factors for not implementing MRCT-JP.Implications
Therapeutic classification and agent type, in addition to capital type and United States and European Union evaluation status suggested by a previous study, were associated with implementing MRCT-JP. It is important to determine the best way to utilize MRCT-JP to maximize the value of products. Our findings were based on successful cases and may therefore be helpful for designing clinical development plans. Appropriate use of MRCT-JP will improve productivity in the pharmaceutical industry. 相似文献4.
In recent years, there is an increasing trend to conduct multi-regional clinical trials (MRCT) for drug development in pharmaceutical industry. A carefully designed MRCT could be used in supporting the new drug's approval in different regions simultaneously. The primary objective of an MRCT is to investigate the drug's overall efficacy across regions while also assessing the drug's performance in some specific regions. In order to claim the study drug's efficacy and get drug approval in some specific region(s), the local regulatory authority may require the sponsors to provide evidence of consistency in the treatment effect between the overall patient population and the local region. Usually, the regional specific consistency requirement needs to be pre-specified before the study conduct and the consistency in treatment effect between the region(s) of interest and overall population will be evaluated at the final analysis. In this article, we evaluate the consistency requirements in multi-regional clinical trials for different endpoints, that is, continuous, binary, and survival endpoints. We also compare the different consistency requirements of the same endpoint/measurement if multiple consistency requirements are enforced and our recommendations for each endpoint/measurement will be made based on the comprehensive consideration. 相似文献
1