Risk factors and management of stoma-related obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with diverting ileostomy

BackgroundStoma-related obstruction (SRO) is defined as small bowel obstruction occurring around the limbs of diverting ileostomy (DI). This study was aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and management of SRO after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with DI creation.MethodsThis study included 155 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery with DI creation for rectal cancer (n = 138), ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 14), and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (n = 3) between 2011 and 2019. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors of SRO.ResultsThe incidence of SRO was 7.7% (n = 12), and it was significantly lower (P < 0.01) in patients with lower anterior resection or intersphincteric resection (4.3%) than in those with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) (35.2%). The multivariate analysis revealed that IPAA was independently associated with the development of SRO (P = 0.001; odds ratio, 9.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–35.4). Eleven of 12 patients (92%) with SRO required trans-stomal tube decompression, and 8 of those (67%) underwent early stoma closure.ConclusionIPAA was an independent risk factor of SRO in laparoscopic colorectal surgery with DI creation. Early stoma closure was needed in most cases of SRO.     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放式腹膜前疝修补术治疗股疝的疗效比较

目的比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）与开放式腹膜前疝修补术治疗股疝的手术结果和对生活质量的影响。 方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2019年12月新疆医科大学第一附属医院收治的58例股疝患者的临床资料，根据手术方式不同分为TAPP组和开放式腹膜前疝修补术组（开放组），TAPP组31例，开放组27例。比较两组手术指标，采用卡罗来纳舒适量表（CCS）评估并比较两组患者术前及术后1、6、12和24个月的生活质量。 结果TAPP组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院天数及术后并发症发生率等方面和开放组相比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；TAPP组在术后24 h疼痛视觉模拟评分及术后镇痛药使用率方面明显优于开放组（P<0.05）；TAPP组术后离床时间及术后首次进食时间长于开放组（P<0.05）；2组患者术后随访24个月，均无复发病例。两种术式均能有效改善患者术前的疼痛、运动受限及总体生活质量（P<0.05）；TAPP组患者术后1个月疼痛及总体生活质量优于开放组（P<0.05）。 结论TAPP与开放式腹膜前疝修补术均可有效治疗股疝。TAPP可作为无全身麻醉禁忌股疝患者的首选治疗方法。股疝的治疗应依据患者的自身情况和手术医师的技术掌握程度制定个体化治疗方案。     

协同式早期运动干预在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者中的应用

目的 探讨协同式早期运动干预在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者中的应用效果。方法 使用随机数字表法将2020年5月-2021年5月于笔者所在医院进行腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的84例患者分为对照组和干预组,各42例。对照组术后采用常规运动干预,干预组术后采用协同式早期运动干预。比较2组术后恢复情况、身体状况、术后并发症发生情况。结果 干预组首次下床活动时间、术后排气时间、术后排便时间均早于对照组(χ²=11.823,P=0.001;χ²=4.687,P=0.001;χ²=7.611,P=0.001),术后7d干预组的多维度疲劳量表评分低于对照组(t=2.000,P=0.049),杜克活动指数高于对照组(t=2.256,P=0.027),2组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.343,P=0.558)。结论 协同式早期运动干预能够促进腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后恢复,改善身体状况,值得推广应用。     

腹腔镜下低位直肠癌前切除术

本手术为腹腔镜下低位直肠癌前切除术式，同时使用吲哚菁绿染色免疫荧光技术。手术视频总长30 min，视频全程无剪辑无加速，基本能反映出手术全程步骤的各个细节，全程手术层次入路标准，几乎无出血。腔镜下操作及缝合动作流畅，手术流程亮点包括保留左结肠动脉、吲哚菁绿染色荧光以及减张关闭盆底腹膜。     

Variation in use of open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and associated outcome metrics in a universal health care system

BackgroundUniversal health care (UHC) should ensure equal access to and use of surgery, but few studies have explored variation in UHC systems. The objective was to describe practice of distal pancreatectomy in Norway covered exclusively by an UHC.MethodsData on all patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy from the Norwegian Patient Register over a 5-year period. Age- and gender-adjusted population-based resection rates (adj. per million/yr) for distal pancreatectomy were analysed across 4 regions and outcomes related to splenic salvage rate, hospital stay, reoperation, readmissions and 90-day mortality risk between regions. Risk is reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (c.i.).ResultsRegional difference exist in terms of absolute numbers, with the majority of procedures done in one region (n = 331; 59.7%). Regional variation persisted for age- and gender-adjusted population-rates, with highest rate at 23.8/million/yr and lowest rate at 13.5/mill/yr (for a 176% relative difference; or an absolute difference of +10.3 resections/million/yr). Overall, a lapDP instead of an open DP was 3.5 times more likely in SouthEast compared to all other regions combined (lapDP rate: 83% vrs 24%, respectively; OR 15.4, 95% c.i. 10.1–23.5; P < 0.001). The splenic salvage rate was lower in SouthEast (19.9%) compared to all other regions (average 26.5%; highest in Central-region at 37.0%; P = 0.010 for trend). Controlled for other factors in multivariate regression, ‘region’ of surgery remained significantly associated with laparoscopic access.ConclusionDespite a universal health care system, considerable variation exists in resection rates, use of laparoscopy and splenic salvage rates across regions.     

双线悬吊法经腹腔入路腹腔镜下肾盂成形术

目的探讨双线悬吊法经腹腔入路腹腔镜下肾盂成形术的临床价值。 方法2016年9月至2018年11月在连云港市第一人民医院采取双线悬吊法经腹腔入路腹腔镜下肾盂成形术患者22例，其中男19例，女3例。年龄4个月～14岁，平均年龄（5.3±2.7）岁。左侧20例，右侧1例，双侧1例，共23侧。右侧经结肠肝曲系膜缘打开侧腹膜入路，左侧经结肠系膜入路，在术中将输尿管和肾盂切口的两端用双线悬吊于腹壁，以便于缝合，用5-0可吸收线行Anderson-Hynes肾盂输尿管成形术，并从吻合口留置双J管，术后结合超声检查随访。 结果22例顺利完成手术，无中转开腹手术者。手术时间90～260 min，单侧平均（137±55）min。术中失血5～20 ml。平均住院时间7 d。术后1例因返流反复发热，在拔出双J管后症状消失，1例发生尿外渗，保留腹腔引流3 d后自愈。术后随访6～25个月，患儿临床症状消失，复查超声提示肾积水消失或减少，肾皮质逐渐增厚。 结论双线悬吊法经腹腹腔镜下肾盂成形术是一种安全、有效、容易学习的手术方法。