Comment on “Outcomes of curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis”

The present letter to the editor is in response to the research “Outcomes of curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis” by Elshaarawy et al in World J Gastroenterol 2021; 13(5): 424–439. The preoperative assessment of the liver reserve function in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with cirrhosis is crucial, and there is no universal consensus on how to assess it. Based on a retrospective study, Elshaarawy et al investigated the impact of various classical clinical indicators on liver failure and the prognosis after hepatectomy in HCC patients with cirrhosis. We recommend that we should strive to explore new appraisal indicators, such as the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min.     

术前控制营养状态评分与肝细胞癌肝切除术后预后的研究进展

肝细胞癌(HCC)是最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。尽管在早期诊断和个体化治疗方面取得了进展,但经根治性切除等治疗后,HCC患者的临床预后仍不佳,复发率高。因此,在HCC患者中识别准确可靠的预后标志物是必要的。作为一种新的免疫营养生物标志物,控制营养状态(CONUT)评分已被报道用于预测癌症患者的预后。本文将对术前CONUT评分与HCC肝切除术后预后的研究进展进行综述。     

Surgical Management and Outcomes of Patients with Multifocal Hepatoblastoma

ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of patients with multifocal hepatoblastoma (HB) treated at our institution with either orthotopic liver transplant (OLTx) or hepatic resection to determine outcomes and risk factors for recurrence.BackgroundMultifocality in HB has been shown to be a significant prognostic factor for recurrence and worse outcome. The surgical management of this type of disease is complex and primarily involves OLTx to avoid leaving behind microscopic foci of disease in the remnant liver.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review on all patients <18 years of age with multifocal HB treated at our institution between 2000 and 2021. Patient demographics, operative procedure, post-operative course, pathological data, laboratory values, short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed.ResultsA total of 41 patients were identified as having complete radiologic and pathologic inclusion criteria. Twenty-three (56.1%) underwent OLTx and 18 (43.9%) underwent partial hepatectomy. Median length of follow-up across all patients was 3.1 years (IQR 1.1–6.6 years). Cohorts were similar in rates of PRETEXT designation status identified on standardized imaging re-review (p = .22). Three-year overall survival (OS) estimate was 76.8% (95% CI: 60.0%–87.3%). There was no difference in rates of recurrence or overall survival in patients who underwent either resection or OLTx (p = .54 and p = .92 respectively). Older patients (>72 months), patients with a positive porta hepatis margin, and patients with associated tumor thrombus experienced worse recurrence rates and survival. Histopathology demonstrating pleomorphic features independently associated with worse rates of recurrence.ConclusionsThrough proper patient selection, multifocal HB was adequately treated with either partial hepatectomy or OLTx with comparable outcome results. HB with pleomorphic features, increased patient age at diagnosis, involved porta hepatis margin on pathology, and the presence of associated tumor thrombus may be associated with worse outcomes regardless of the local control surgery offered.Level of EvidenceIII.     

肝段或肝叶切除术对肝内胆管结石再次手术效果的影响

目的对比不同术式对肝内胆管结石再次手术效果，探讨肝段或肝叶切除术的优势。 方法回顾性分析2011年8月至2014年8月收治的79例肝内胆管结石再次手术患者资料，依据术式不同分为肝段(叶)切除术组(甲组，n＝38)和非肝段(叶)切除术组(乙组，n＝41)两组。应用SPSS 19.0软件对所有临床数据进行统计学分析，手术相关指标等以( ±s)的形式表示，组间比较采用独立t检验；术后并发症发生情况及预后情况等计数资料以例(%)的形式表示，采用χ²检验；P<0.05差异有统计学意义。 结果两组患者术中出血量、手术时间及术后住院时间相比，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；甲组患者的术后并发症发生率5.3%(2/38)显著低于乙组22.0%(9/41)(P<0.05)；甲组残留结石发生率、症状复发率2.6%(1/38)、 0(0/41)均显著低于乙组17.1%(7/41)、 12.2%(5/41)(P<0.05)，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；但两组患者的病死率2.6%(1/38)和0(0/41)相比，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论肝段(叶)切除术能够有效改善肝内胆管结石再次手术效果，值得推广。     

腹腔镜肝癌根治术的热点与未来发展

随着腹腔镜肝切除技术的发展与推广，腹腔镜肝切除中的一些难点，如术中出血的控制、解剖性肝切除、巨大肝癌切除、腹腔镜下联合肝脏分割与门静脉支结扎的二步肝切除术(ALPPS)等方面均基本解决。术中超声与荧光染色技术也得到普及。本文就上述问题做一概述，并对腹腔镜肝切除未来发展提出思路，以进一步推动我国腹腔镜肝切除的技术进步。     

腹腔镜扩大左半肝联合全尾叶切除术

1．肝门处预置肝门阻断带，必要时行肝门阻断控制出血；2.肝脏肿瘤压迫第一、二、三肝门及下腔静脉，紧贴肿瘤包膜处理各管道，采取左右结合、由浅入深的策略；3.优先离断肝实质，劈肝后分离出左侧肝蒂，以直线切割闭合器离断左侧肝蒂；4.肝实质内紧贴包块包膜离断肝实质；5.肝脏包块侵犯肝中静脉及右侧尾状叶，术中联合肝中静脉及全尾叶切除；6.术中避免损伤右侧肝蒂及右肝静脉；7.术中使用超声刀、Ligasure等能量器械断肝、止血；8.缝合技术在腹腔镜肝切除手术中具有重要作用。     

Spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma: Optimal timing of partial hepatectomy

BackgroundPartial hepatectomy has been used to treat patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) which spontaneously ruptured. It is still controversial as to whether emergency partial hepatectomy (EmPH) should be carried out at the time of rupture, or the patients should initially be managed by operative or non-operative treatment to stop the bleeding, followed by staged early or delayed partial hepatectomy when the patient's condition becomes stable.MethodsConsecutive 10-year patients with ruptured HCC managed at our center were included in this study. Patients who underwent partial hepatectomy were further subdivided into the EmPH group, the staged early partial hepatectomy (SEPH) group, and the staged delayed partial hepatectomy (SDPH) group. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors affecting overall survival(OS) were conducted before and after propensity score matching analyses amongst the included patients. OS, postoperative mortality, recurrence free survival (RFS), and peritoneal metastatic rates were compared. The risk factors of peritoneal metastases were determined using the COX regression analysis.ResultsThe 130 patients who underwent partial hepatectomy were subdivided into the EmPH group (surgery at the time of rupture, n = 30), the SEPH group (surgery ≤ 8 days of rupture, n = 67), and the SDPH group (surgery > 8 days of rupture, n = 33). The remaining 86 patients underwent non-surgical treatment. Partial hepatectomy was an independent predictor of better OS (HR 2.792, P < 0.001). For resectable HCC, the 30-day mortality, OS, and RFS were similar between the EmPH group, and the staged partial hepatectomy (SPH) group which included the patients who underwent SEPH and SDPH. The SEPH group had significantly better OS and RFS. Multivariate COX regression analysis demonstrated that SDPH was strongly associated with postoperative peritoneal dissemination (OR 28.775, P = 0.003).ConclusionPartial hepatectomy provided significantly better survival than non-surgical treatment for patients who presented with ruptured HCC. Early partial hepatectomy within 8 days of rupture which included EmPH (carefully selected) and SEPH, resulted in significantly less patients with peritoneal dissemination and better long-term survival outcomes (especially RFS) than SDPH.     

腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术的前瞻性对比研究

目的探讨腹腔镜下解剖性肝切除术和非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝癌的临床疗效。 方法按照前瞻性随机对照试验选取本院2015年1月至2018年2月期间收治的106例肝癌患者进行，按照随机数字表法分为解剖组(行腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术)和非解剖组(行腹腔镜非解剖性肝切除术)各53例。采用SPSS20.0统计软件对数据进行分析，围术期指标、肝功能指标用( ±s)表示，采用独立t检验；术后并发症发生率、术后1年复发转移率和生存率组间比较用χ²检验；P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果解剖组的手术时间明显长于非解剖组，但术中出血量、输血量明显减少，住院时间显著短于非解剖组(P<0.05)。非解剖组术后第1、3、7天血清ALT、TBIL值明显高于解剖组(P<0.05)；术后1、3天血清AST值解剖组低于非解剖组(P<0.05)。解剖组术后并发症发生率为7.5%低于非解剖组22.6%(P<0.05)。解剖组与非解剖组1年总体生存率分别为94.3%和88.6%，两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；1年无瘤生存率分别为90.6%和75.5%(P＝0.038)，两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论相对于腹腔镜非解剖性肝切除术，腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术临床疗效更好，并有效提高1年无瘤生存率，值得在临床上进一步推广应用。