新生儿肺部超声在早产儿肺部感染评价中的价值

目的 探讨新生儿肺部超声在早产儿肺部感染评价中的价值。 方法 选取肺部感染早产儿80例为观察组，无肺部感染的早产儿80例为对照组，均给予新生儿肺部超声检查，比较2组肺部超声评分、氧合指数、呼吸指数，比较观察组不同病情、预后患儿肺部超声评分、氧合指数、呼吸指数,分析肺部超声评分和氧合指数、呼吸指数的相关性。 结果 观察组肺部超声评分、氧合指数低于对照组，呼吸指数高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。观察组极危重患儿肺部超声评分、氧合指数低于危重和非危重患儿，呼吸指数高于危重和非危重患儿，危重患儿肺部超声评分、氧合指数低于非危重患儿，呼吸指数高于非危重患儿，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。肺部超声评分与呼吸指数呈负相关（r=-0.455，P＜0.05），与氧合指数呈正相关（r=0.470，P＜0.05）。观察组死亡患儿肺部超声评分、氧合指数低于存活患儿，呼吸指数高于存活患儿，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。肺部超声评分预测患儿预后的ROC曲线下面积为0.874，高于呼吸指数和氧合指数（P＜0.05），其截断值为20分时，敏感度和特异度为88.50%和75.00%。 结论 新生儿肺部超声在早产儿肺部感染评价中有较好的效果，值得临床使用。     

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines on the management of community acquired pneumonia in children

Childhood community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the leading cause of mortality in children under 5 years worldwide. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) may be limited by method of development, scope of recommendations and the quality of supporting evidence. This study systematically identified, appraised and compared the recommendations of CPGs for the management of paediatric CAP using the AGREE II tool.The systematic review yielded 1409 non-duplicate results, of which 14 CPGs were appraised. Four of the fourteen CPGs were deemed high quality. Most CPGs were considered low-medium quality with ‘rigour of development’ and ‘applicability’ the weakest domains. These areas should be considered in deriving CPGs in the future. Recommendations were generally similar across all guidelines; however, there was notable heterogeneity in three areas. This suggests the need for further evidence to guide management decisions on oxygen saturation thresholds for admission, the utility of investigations such as acute phase reactants, and the duration of antibiotic therapy.     

儿童社区获得性肺炎血清维生素A的变化及与免疫功能相关性

目的 研究社区获得性肺炎(community acquired pneumonia,CAP)患儿血清维生素A(vitamin A,VA)水平及与免疫功能的相关性,为肺炎病情评估提供一定参考。方法 以入住新乡医学院第一附属医院PICU的63例重度社区获得性肺炎(severe community acquired pneumonia, SCAP)患儿(SCAP组)、普通儿科病区的30例轻度社区获得性肺炎(mild community acquired pneumonia, MCAP)患儿(MCAP组),以及同期体检的30名健康儿童(对照组)为研究对象,检测其血清中VA和免疫球蛋白(immunoglobulin,Ig)G、IgA、IgM水平,及SCAP组体内T淋巴细胞亚群(总T淋巴细胞、CD4、CD8、CD4/CD8),并对SCAP组体内VA水平及以上指标的相关性进行分析。结果 3组性别和年龄差异无统计学意义;血清中VA的平均含量分别为0.36、0.25和0.19 mg/L,CAP组VA的含量较对照组明显降低,且SCAP组明显低于MCAP组(P<0.05)。根据WHO推荐的VA诊断标准,3组VA临床缺乏/亚临床缺乏率分别为10.00%、36.67%和61.90%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。CAP组血清中Ig水平较对照组明显降低,且SCAP组明显低于MCAP组(P<0.05)。SCAP组血中总T淋巴细胞、CD4、CD8和CD4/CD8的平均水平分别为53.28%、30.26%、20.24%和1.59;分析VA水平与免疫相关指标关系发现VA水平与Ig(IgG、IgA、IgM)水平、总T淋巴细胞、CD4呈正相关,与CD8水平不相关。结论 肺炎患儿血清VA水平与病情严重程度及机体免疫功能相关。     

Viral infections in critical care: a narrative review

Viral infections form a substantial part of the intensive care workload, even before the recent and ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The growing availability of molecular diagnostics for viral infections has led to increased recognition of these pathogens. This additional information, however, provides new challenges for interpretation and management. As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has amply demonstrated, the emergence and global spread of novel viruses are likely to provide continued challenges for critical care physicians into the future. This article will provide an overview of viral infections relevant to the critical care physician, discussing the diagnosis and management of respiratory viral infections, blood borne and enteric viruses. We will also discuss herpesviridae complications, commonly seen due to reactivation of latent infections. Further, we explore some rarer and emerging viruses, including recognition of viral haemorrhagic fevers, and briefly discuss post-viral syndromes which may present to the intensive care unit. Finally, we will discuss infection control and its importance in preventing nosocomial viral transmission.     

新型冠状病毒肺炎危重症中医药干预的必要性思考

新型冠状病毒肺炎(NCP)是一种具有广泛传染、较强致病性的外感疫病,对公众健康造成极大威胁[1-2]。由于病邪侵入人体后传变迅速,疫毒易于弥漫三焦、充斥表里转为危重症,处于危重症时现代医学目前只能对症支持治疗,为恢复危重症患者脏器机能、改善危重症状,配合中医药辨证施治值得深入思考。现以中医整体辨证的视角对新型冠状病毒肺炎所致危重病症辨证梳理,为临床提供一定的借鉴。     

35例新型冠状病毒肺炎患者中医临床特征分析

目的分析广东省新型冠状病毒肺炎患者临床资料及中医证候,为该病的防治提供科学依据。方法将2020年1月23日至2020年2月14日本院收治的35例新型冠状病毒肺炎患者纳为研究对象,收集患者的基本情况、流行病学史及疾病史,通过血液生化分析及胸部CT检查患者临床情况,由5名高级职称中医师对患者舌象进行诊断,并根据《广东省新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎中医药治疗方案(试行第一版)》进行辨证。结果新型冠状病毒肺炎患者年龄分布较广,平均年龄为(44.00±15.17)岁,以男性居多,57.14%的患者有武汉及周边地区旅居史,42.86%的患者有确诊患者接触史;50%以上的患者淋巴细胞绝对值降低,CD3、CD4和、CD8降低以及C反应蛋白增加;胸部CT显示,80%以上的患者出现肺部病变,其中双肺病变占60%,病变类型以斑块状阴影居多;多数患者伴有发热(85.71%)、咳嗽(80.00%)、肌肉酸痛(42.86%)、乏力(40.00%)等临床症状;患者的证型主要是湿邪郁肺(45.71%),其次为邪热壅肺(37.14%),病机特点以湿为主,其次为热;舌苔以腻苔为主,舌质以红和淡红为主。结论新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的中医证型以湿邪郁肺为主,致病特点以"湿"为主,可针对性地采取中医治疗。     

Meta分析评价热毒宁注射液联合抗生素治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的疗效及安全性

【目的】用Meta分析方法评价热毒宁联合抗生素治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的临床疗效及安全性。【方法】计算机检索Pubmed、Embase、CBM、CNKI、VIP和万方数据等中英文数据库,纳入符合标准的随机对照试验文献,采用Jadad质量评分法进行评价,对纳入的文献进行Meta分析。【结果】最终纳入8篇研究,总病例数2451例,Meta分析结果显示:与单用抗生素组相比,联合用药组在总有效率[OR=4.83,95%CI(2.9,6.62),P<0.05]、咳嗽咳喘咳痰消失时间[WMD=-2.64,95%CI(-2.75,-2.54),P<0.05]、肺部啰音消失时间[WMD=-0.96,95%CI(-1.18,-0.74),P<0.05]、X线病灶阴影吸收时间(WMD=-2.88,95%CI(-3.05,-2.71),P<0.00001]、呼吸气促消失时间[WMD=-1.26,95%CI(-1.32,-1.20),P<0.05]等方面更具优势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。【结论】热毒宁联合抗生素治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎安全可行,效果良好,但结论尚需更多高质量的大样本、多中心、随机、双盲、对照的临床试验进一步证实。