Influence of posture on blink reflex prepulse inhibition induced by somatosensory inputs from upper and lower limbs

BackgroundPrepulse inhibition (PPI) is a neurophysiological phenomenon whereby a weak stimulus modulates the reflex response to a subsequent strong stimulus. Its physiological purpose is to avoid interruption of sensory processing by subsequent disturbing stimuli at the subcortical level, thereby preventing undesired motor reactions. An important hub in the PPI circuit is the pedunculopontine nucleus, which is also involved in the control of posture and sleep/wakefulness.ObjectiveTo study the effect of posture (supine versus standing) on PPI, induced by somatosensory prepulses to either upper or lower limb. PPI was measured as the percentage inhibition of the blink reflex response to electrical supraorbital nerve (SON) stimulation.MethodsSixteen healthy volunteers underwent bilateral blink reflex recordings following SON stimulation either alone (baseline) or preceded by an electrical prepulse to the median nerve (MN) or sural nerve (SN), both in supine and standing. Stimulus intensity was 8 times sensory threshold for SON, and 2 times sensory threshold for MN and SN, respectively. Eight stimuli were applied in each condition.ResultsBaseline blink reflex parameters did not differ significantly between the two postures. Prepulse stimulation to MN and SN caused significant inhibition of R2. In supine but not in standing, R2 was significantly more inhibited by MN than by SN prepulses. In standing, SN stimulation caused significantly more inhibition of R2 than in supine, while the inhibition caused by MN prepulses did not differ significantly between postures.SignificancePPI induced by lower limb afferent input may contribute to postural control while standing.     

Orbicularis oculi responses to stimulation of nerve afferents from upper and lower limbs in normal humans

A brief mechanical or electrical stimulus to peripheral nerve afferents from the upper and lower limbs elicited a small and inconsistent EMG response of the orbicularis oculi muscles. This response was facilitated when the stimuli were delivered at fixed leading time intervals, of 45–300 ms, with respect to a supraorbital nerve electrical stimulus. Also, the peripheral nerve stimulus modified the conventional blink reflex responses, inducing facilitation of R1 and inhibition of R2. These results suggest a complex processing of sensory inputs from the face and the limbs at the brainstem, where they are probably integrated in a network of interneurons influencing the excitability of facial motoneurons.     

瞬目反射、脑干听觉诱发电位、经颅多普勒超声对椎基底动脉供血不足的诊断价值

目的：观察瞬目反射（ＢＲ）、脑干听觉诱发电位（ＢＡＥＰ）、经颅多普勒超声（ＴＣＤ）对椎基底动脉供血不足（ＶＢＩ）的诊断意义。方法：对４１例已经临床确诊的ＶＢＩ病人在间歇期进行ＢＲ、ＢＡＥＰ及ＴＣＤ检查。结果：ＴＣＤ、ＢＲ、ＢＡＥＰ异常率分别为８３％、８０％、６８％。ＢＲ提示脑桥损害１例、延髓损害１５例、广泛性脑干损害１７例；ＢＡＥＰ发现内耳听力减退２０例、脑干病变１３例；ＴＣＤ发现多血管流速异常１４例、一支流速改变１６例，有或伴有血管张力异常１３例。结论：由于ＢＲ、ＢＡＥＰ反射路径不同，检测结果不尽一致。联合检查有助于对病损部位进行定位。ＴＣＤ则有助于定性诊断     

A role for the basal ganglia in nicotinic modulation of the blink reflex

Summary In humans and rats we found that nicotine transiently modifies the blink reflex. For blinks elicited by stimulation of the supraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve, nicotine decreased the magnitude of the orbicularis oculi electromyogram (OOemg) and increased the latency of only the long-latency (R2) component. For blinks elicited by electrical stimulation of the cornea, nicotine decreased the magnitude and increased the latency of the single component of OOemg response. Since nicotine modified only one component of the supraorbitally elicited blink reflex, nicotine must act primarily on the central nervous system rather than at the muscle. The effects of nicotine could be caused by direct action on lower brainstem interneurons or indirectly by modulating descending systems impinging on blink interneurons. Since precollicular decerebration eliminated nicotine's effects on the blink reflex, nicotine must act through descending systems. Three lines of evidence suggest that nicotine affects the blink reflex through the basal ganglia by causing dopamine release in the striatum. First, stimulation of the substantia nigra mimicked the effects of nicotine on the blink reflex. Second, haloperidol, a dopamine (D₂) receptor antagonist, blocked the effect of nicotine on the blink reflex. Third, apomorphine, a D₂ receptor agonist, mimicked the effects of nicotine on the blink reflex.     

Maturation of Startle Modulation

This study of the maturation of prestimulation-induced modulation of startle in 3 to 8 year old children and adults demonstrated significant effects of age on both startle magnitude and onset latency. Startle was evoked by 104dB(SPL) 50-ms bursts of white noise, and the amplitude and onset latency of the blink reflex were measured after integration of the obicularis oculi EMG. Prestimulation with 75dB 1000 Hz tones resulted in severe inhibition of both amplitude and latency in adults when 20-ms tones preceded the startling stimuli by 120 ms or 250 ms. Following sustained prestimulation for 2000 ms, the adults showed modest nonsignificant response facilitation. Eight-year-old children showed mature inhibitory and facilitatory startle amplitude modulation, but significantly less inhibition and more facilitation of onset latency compared to adults. Preschool children showed significantly less amplitude and latency inhibition and more facilitation than 8-year-olds and adults. In response to prestimulation 120 ms before startling stimuli, the preschool children actually showed latency facilitation. Modulation of startle by prestimulation is mediated by brainstem neuronal networks. These findings suggest that brainstem mechanisms which mediate startle response modulation undergo development during early childhood and do not mature until about 8 years of age.     

Auditory Discrimination and the Eyeblink

This experiment evaluated the association between blinking and cognitive activities. Subjects received 200 and 400 ms tones (1 KHz) at fixed intervals in a duration discrimination paradigm. One group (“Task”) was instructed to respond to the stimuli on the basis of duration and another (“No-Task”) was instructed to ignore the stimuli. Blink activity (latency, rate, duration) and performance (RT, hit and false alarm rates) measures were evaluated. A first analysis (Task subjects only) indicated that stimulus duration had significant effects on RT and blink latency; both were generally longer following the 400-ms than the 200-ms stimuli. In a second analysis, involving Task and No-Task subjects, blink latencies were shorter in the Task group. Blink and eyelid closure durations increased over the task period in both analyses. These effects suggest that blinks occur when attentional processes wane.     

面神经电图与瞬目反射在Bell麻痹中的应用比较

目的：比较面神经电图（ENoG)与瞬目反射（BR）在Bell麻痹中的应用价值。方法：50例Bell麻痹患者在发病后1－3天（A组）和8－14天（B组）分别作面神经EnoG与BR检查。结果：BR在1－3天患侧就表现出明显异常，但1－3天及8－14天检查无明显差异。面神经ENoG在8－14天才表现明显异常。结论：对于Bell麻痹患者早期诊断作BR优于面神经ENoG，面神经ENoG在发病后8－14天对预后评价优于BR。     

Startle modulation and explicit valence evaluations dissociate during backward fear conditioning

Blink startle magnitude is linearly modulated by affect such that, relative to neutral stimuli, startle magnitude is inhibited during pleasant stimuli and potentiated during unpleasant stimuli. Andreatta, Mühlberger, Yarali, Gerber, and Pauli (2010), however, report a dissociation between startle modulation and explicit valence evaluations during backward conditioning, a procedure in which the unconditional stimulus precedes the conditional stimulus (CS). Relative to controls, startles elicited during the CS were inhibited, suggesting that the CS had acquired positive valence, but participants still evaluated the CS as unpleasant after the experiment. In Experiment 1, we aimed to replicate this dissociation using a trial‐by‐trial measure of CS valence to measure startle modulation and CS valence simultaneously during forward and backward differential fear conditioning. In Experiment 2, we examined whether early and late portions of the CS could acquire differential valence by presenting startle probes at early and late probe positions during the CS. In both experiments, the dissociation between startle modulation and explicit valence evaluations in backward conditioning replicated, with CS+ evaluated as less pleasant than CS‐, but startles elicited during CS+ inhibited relative to CS‐. In Experiment 2, we provide preliminary evidence that this inhibition was present early, but not late, during the CS+. The results replicate the dissociation between implicit and explicit CS valence reported by Andreatta et al. (2010) using a trial‐by‐trial measure of valence. We also provide preliminary evidence that this dissociation may occur because the implicit and explicit measures are recorded at different times during the CS presentation.     

Alterations in excitatory and inhibitory brainstem interneuronal circuits in fibromyalgia: Evidence of brainstem dysfunction

ObjectivePatients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) perceive stimuli differently and show altered cortical sensory representation maps following peripheral stimulation. Altered sensory gating may play a causal role.MethodsBlink reflex, blink reflex excitability recovery, and prepulse inhibition of the blink reflex – representing brainstem excitability – were assessed in 10 female patients with FMS and 26 female healthy controls.ResultsUnconditioned blink reflex characteristics (R1 latency and amplitude, R2 and R2c latency and area-under-the-curve) did not differ significantly between patients and controls. Blink reflex excitability recovery was enhanced in patients versus controls at all intervals tested. Prepulses significantly suppressed R2 area and increased R2 latency in patients and controls. However, R2 area suppression was significantly less in patients than in controls (patients: to 80.0 ± 28.9%, controls: to 47.8 ± 21.7%). The general pattern of corresponding changes in R2c was similar.ConclusionsBlink reflex is normal, whereas blink reflex excitability recovery is enhanced and blink reflex prepulse inhibition is reduced in patients with FMS, suggesting functional changes at the brainstem level in FMS.SignificanceReduced blink reflex prepulse inhibition concurs with altered sensory gating in patients with FMS.