Robust antibody response after a third BNT162b2 vaccine compared to the second among immunocompromised and healthy individuals,a prospective longitudinal cohort study

PurposeAs protection from COVID-19 following two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine showed a time dependent waning, a third (booster) dose was administrated. This study aims to compare the antibody response following the third dose versus the second and to evaluate post-booster seroconversion.MethodsA prospective observational study conducted in Maccabi Healthcare Services. Serial SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG tests, 1,2,3 and 6 months following the second vaccine dose and one month following the third were obtained. Neutralizing antibody levels were measured in a subset of participants. Per individual SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG titer ratios were calculated one month after the booster administration compared to titers one month following the second dose and prior to booster.ResultsAmong 110 participants, 56 (51%) were women. Mean age was 61.7 ± 1.9 years and 66 (60%) were immunocompromised. One month after third dose, IgG titers were induced 7.83 (95 %CI 5.25–11.67) folds and 2.40 (95 %CI 1.90–3.03) folds compared to one month after the second, in the immunocompromised and immunocompetent groups, respectively. Of the 17 immunocompromised participants who were seronegative after the second dose, 4 (24%) became seropositive following the third. Comparing the titers prior to the third dose, an increase of 50.7 (95 %CI 32.5–79.1) fold in the immunocompromised group and 25.7 (95 %CI 19.1–34.7) fold in and immunocompetent group, was observed.ConclusionA third BNT162b2 vaccine elicited robust humoral response, superior to the response observed following the second, among immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals.     

Immunotherapy as Single Treatment for Patients With NSCLC With Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis—the META-L-BRAIN Study

IntroductionBrain metastases (BMs) occur in 40% of patients with lung cancer. The activity of immunotherapy in these patients, however, remains controversial, as the cornerstone treatment is radiotherapy (RT). Because RT is associated with adverse events that may impair the quality of life, the possibility of substituting it with a single systemic approach is attractive. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the potential benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with NSCLC with untreated BM (unBM).MethodsStudies that enrolled patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs and specifically allowed for unBM were identified by searching the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and other databases. The outcomes evaluated were intracerebral overall response rate (icORR) and intracerebral disease control rate (icDCR) for unBM, and grades 3 and 4 toxicity rate.ResultsWe included 12 studies with a total of 566 individuals in the final analysis. Anti–programmed cell death protein-1 therapy seems to be active in the central nervous system, with an icORR of 16.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.8%–24%; I² = 33.17%) and an icDCR of 45% (95% CI: 33.4%–56.9%; I² = 46.91%). In the meta-analysis for icORR (risk ratio = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.57–2.79) and icDCR (risk ratio = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.55–1.43) we did not observe any difference among patients with BM who were treated with RT before ICI start and those who were treated with ICI only.ConclusionsICI seems to be effective as a single treatment for active BM in selected patients with advanced NSCLC.     

尿液10项肾损伤标志物检测试剂的性能评价

摘要:目的对尿液 10项肾损伤标志物检测试剂进行性能评价,并评估其临床适用性。方法对北京利德曼公司尿液a1 微球蛋白(u-a|MG)、总蛋白(u-TP)、免疫球蛋白G(u-IgG) 、微量清蛋白(u-Alb)、中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(u-NGAL)、半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C(u-CysC).视黄醇结合蛋白(u-RBP)、β2微球蛋白(u-β2MG)、N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶(u-NAG).、转铁蛋白(u-Trf)检测试剂盒进行性能评价。正确度和精密度验证参考美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)EP15-A3,验证物质采用ERM-DA470k、ERM-DA471、B2M-NIBSC等参考物质及纯度物质;线性验证参考CLSI EP06;抗干扰能力参考CISI EP07;不同检测系统间比对参考CISI EP09。结果正确度方面,10 项标志物检测试剂测定标准物质在低值、中值、高值的偏倚分别为-2.69% ~4.67%、-3.60% ~3.33% .-2.38% ~3.02%;不精密度方面,重复性以不精密度表示,在低值和高值处分别为1.90%~5.43%、0.63% ~2.42%,室内不精密度为2.27%~5.63%、1.09%~3.41%,均满足临床要求;10项尿液标志物线性范围在0.06~4.40 mg/L至21.83~2 146.77 mg/L之间。抗干扰方面,u-1 MG、u-Alb、u-β2MG、u-Trf 、u-CysC、u-NAG分别在血红蛋白终浓度≤8 g/L、≤8 g/L、≤4 g/L、≤4 g/L、≤2g/L、≤1 g/L时,未受到明显干扰(百分偏差≤+ 10%) ,而u-TP、u-IgG、 u-RBP、u-NGAL在血红蛋白终浓度≥0.125 g/L时即受干扰。不同检测系统间偏差超出临床允许范围。结论尿液 10项肾损伤标志物的正确度、精密度、线性范围和抗血红蛋白干扰能力满足临床需要,不同检测系统间标志物测量结果可比性欠佳。     

基于代谢组学分析的18-三体妊娠羊水差异代谢物

摘要:目的通过 非靶向代谢组学方法分析18-三体( trisomy 18,T18) 妊娠母体羊水样本,探索其差异代谢物。方法采用病 例-对照研究,以8例18-三体妊娠母体羊水样本为病例组,40例正常胎儿母体羊水样本为对照组,采用气相色谱飞行时间质 谱技术( GC-T0F/MS)检测两组羊水样本。采用主成分分析(PCA)和正交偏最小二乘法判别分析(OPIS-DA)模型分析代谢谱 差异,通过单维统计分析寻找差异代谢物。结果PCA 和OPLS-DA模型分析均显示病例组与对照组之间无明显分离趋势。 通过单维分析在两组间共发现5种差异代谢物,分别为甘油醛、葡萄糖酸、硫酸吲哚酚.磷酸盐和泛酸(P<0.05)。结论羊水 代谢组学证实18-三体妊娠存在多种代谢物水平的差异,为疾病的发生机制的探索提供了更多研究思路。     

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: It’s Not Your Normal Hoofbeats

The purpose of this article is to acquaint the reader with the presentation, diagnosis, and management of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), a group of genetic connective tissue disorders. Progressive weakness of connective tissue is the underlying cause of all types of EDS. The symptoms of EDS are numerous, with variability in presentation. However, decreased quality of life caused by chronic pain and fatigue is a commonality of all types of EDS. This article will assist the nurse practitioner in recognizing EDS and offer guidance for treatment.     

Chemotherapy and Radiation Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Elderly Patients With N3 Stage IIIB NSCLC

BackgroundStandard treatment for stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (chemo-RT). However, N3 stage IIIB disease portends a worse prognosis and the tolerability of chemo-RT in patients ≥70 years old is a concern. In this analysis, we evaluate the survival of patients with N3 stage IIIB NSCLC who were treated with chemo-RT or chemotherapy alone with a focus on elderly patients.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with N3 stage IIIB NSCLC between 2010 and 2013 using the National Cancer Database. We compared overall survival (OS) between patients who underwent chemo-RT versus chemotherapy alone. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for median OS with log rank tests. Multivariable Cox models were used for multivariable and subgroup analyses.ResultsWe included 9769 patients in our analysis, 7770 of whom received chemo-RT and 1999 who received chemotherapy alone. The median OS for patients who received chemo-RT was 16.4 months versus 12.7 months with chemotherapy alone (P < .0001). The median OS for patients ≥70 years old who received chemo-RT was 15.0 months versus 12.4 months with chemotherapy alone (P < .0001). In multivariable analyses, the benefit of chemo-RT was similar regardless of age. Subgroup analyses in patients ≥70 years indicated a benefit of chemo-RT (hazard ratio, <1.0) across all patient and disease strata.ConclusionSurvival was improved in elderly patients who received chemo-RT versus chemotherapy alone for N3 stage IIIB NSCLC. Our findings suggest that age and comorbidities should not preclude clinicians from recommending chemo-RT to these patients.