预防医学实验教学体系改革与实践

目的探索预防医学实验教学的新方法和教学模式,以培养学生的科研思维,加强学生动手操作能力的锻炼。方法针对预防医学实验教学中存在的诸如课程设置因受制于理论课而缺乏系统性和科学性、各学科实验课程设置交叉重复等问题,对预防医学实验教学体系进行了系统改革,通过实践对教学结果进行分析。结果创建了整合式以能力培养为中心的基础性、综合设计性新型实验教学体系,实现了实验课程模块化、实验教学内容系列化、实验项目层次化、实验课程考核方式多样化、教学方法科学化、教学评价制度化等模块化管理。结论新的教学体系通过实践取得的明显效果,对培养具有创新思维和实践动手能力强的复合型高素质预防医学人才具有积极指导作用。     

基于虚拟仿真实验的化妆品检验与安全性评价实验教学改革探讨

虚拟仿真实验是利用虚拟仿真技术对实验过程、实验仪器进行模拟，具有直观性、共享性、节约成本等优点。由于化妆品检验与安全性评价传统实验形式单一，易受实验时间、场所、经费的限制，因此本研究尝试将虚拟仿真实验应用于化妆品检验与安全性评价实验教学，从优选实验项目、组织开展虚拟仿真实验、教学效果评价三个方面阐述，探讨虚拟仿真实验在化妆品检验与安全性评价实验教学中的应用。     

自动电位滴定法和高效液相色谱法测定深颜色果蔬中维生素C浓度的比较

目的：探讨应用自动电位滴定法和高效液相色谱（HPLC）法定量测定深颜色果蔬中维生素C（Vc）浓度的可行性，为少量或批量果蔬样品Vc浓度的测定提供方法依据。方法：选取市售的15种蔬菜和15种水果的可食部分，加入一定量的草酸做Vc保护剂进行匀浆、过滤、离心处理，取一定量的上清液分别对其中的Vc浓度进行自动电位滴定和HPLC分析，对于同一红柿椒样品，分别用2种分析法对样品的Vc浓度进行准确度和精确度的测定。结果：2种分析法检测30种果蔬中Vc的浓度差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），电位法对红柿椒中Vc浓度测定的回收率为98.34%～103.98%，HPLC法对Vc浓度测定的回收率为99.66%～101.49%；电位法测定红柿椒中Vc的相对标准偏差（RSD）为1.77%～2.88%，HPLC法测定Vc的RSD为0.15%～0.32%，且HPLC法线性关系良好(R2=0.999　9)。结论：2种分析法对深颜色果蔬样品中Vc浓度测定的准确度和精密度均能满足定量分析的要求，均为较理想的测试方法。     

Multidisciplinary team approach to diabetes. An outlook on providers’ and patients’ perspectives

Objective/BackgroundThis study sought to uncover the perspectives of various stakeholders towards multidisciplinary team (MDT) care, discover new understandings and help inform current practice on MDT care for diabetic patients.Methods5 electronic databases were searched for articles that evaluated patients’ and providers’ perspectives on type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) MDT management. Articles retrieved were sieved, coded and findings were analytically themed together in accordance to Thomas and Harden methodology.Results15 articles were identified with three common themes: interactions between healthcare providers, benefits to patients and constraints and facilitators of the healthcare system. Trust and synergistic teamwork are important factors in promoting effective care. Patients commended MDT's improved accessibility and convenience and felt more welcomed. Often plagued by poor support, lack of manpower and resources, MDTs are less efficient and incapable of realizing their full potential.ConclusionThis review illustrates that the MDT model does improve diabetes treatment outcome, help prevent or reduce complications. Nevertheless, the MDT model can be a double-edged sword as poor interactions between HCPs can hamper quality patient care. The current MDT model is also based on available resources of the health system. More effort is needed to modify the MDT model to meet the changing needs of patients.