Migration and wear of hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups in revision hip arthroplasty: A radiostereometric study

Screw-fixated and hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups were studied using radiostereometry in 29 revision and 14 primary arthroplasties. The acetabular defects in the revision cases varied from none to type 3 (wall defects) according to Gustilo—Pasternak. Morsellized allograft was used in 25 revisions. Nine of these cups rested on less than 50% living bone. After 2 years, the mean migration in the revised group reached 0.36, 0.21, and 0.49 mm in the horizontal, longitudinal, and anteroposterior (AP) directions. The mean rotations varied between 0.5° and 0.7° depending on direction. The primary implants displayed smaller mediolateral migration and AP tilt. The mean proximal wear rate for the whole group was 0.11 mm/y. A central gap on the postoperative AP view implied less migration. The size of the preoperative bone defects or amount of bone—graft used had no influence on the migration. Despite extensive use of morsellized allograft, this implant displayed the smallest migration so far reported in revision hip arthroplasty.     

Long-Term Outcomes of a Titanium-Encased Ceramic Liner Total Hip Arthroplasty (15 to 21Year Results)

BackgroundHistorically, aseptic loosening and osteolysis were responsible for most of the revisions among young and more active patients. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings reduced wear but presented mechanical issues such ceramic fracture or liner chipping during insertion. To prevent this from happening a titanium-encased alumina liner was developed. The aim of this study is to address long-term results of this specific ceramic design.MethodsAll patients received an uncemented acetabular component with ceramic-on-ceramic bearing (94 hips in 77 patients). Patients were prospectively followed over 15 years. Clinical evaluation included the Harris Hip Score and Visual Analog Scale pain scale. Radiographic analysis included integration, osteolysis, and ceramic-related mechanical issues, such as malseating of the insert.ResultsThe studied acetabular design survivorship was 98.9% at a mean follow-up of 17.2 years. One arthroplasty was revised secondary to infection but no cup had loosened or migrated during the study. Only 1 cup showed complete radiolucent lines. There was no fracture of any ceramic component in the study group. Malseating was present in 12 acetabular components (12.8%). No osteolysis was observed with over 15 years of follow-up.ConclusionIn conclusion, this acetabular component demonstrates a favorable clinical and radiological outcome with over 15 years of follow-up. Osteolysis was not observed and incomplete seating of the titanium-sleeved ceramic liner did not lead to mechanical problems.     

Uncemented versus cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of primary metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM-TR) converted to uncemented total hip replacement (UTR) or cemented total hip replacement (CTR) in patients with femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA: 31B/C).MethodsPatient data of 234 UTR or CTR revisions after primary MoM-TR failure from March 2007 to January 2018 were retrospectively identified. Clinical outcomes, including the Harris hip score (HHS) and key orthopaedic complications, were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months following conversion and every 12 months thereafter.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 84.12 (67–100) months for UTR and 84.23 (66–101) months for CTR. At the last follow-up, the HHS was better in the CTR- than UTR-treated patients. Noteworthy dissimilarities were correspondingly detected in the key orthopaedic complication rates (16.1% for CTR vs. 47.4% for UTR). Statistically significant differences in specific orthopaedic complications were also detected in the re-revision rate (10.3% for UTR vs. 2.5% for CTR), prosthesis loosening rate (16.3% for UTR vs. 5.9% for CTR), and periprosthetic fracture rate (12.0% for UTR vs. 4.2% for CTR).ConclusionIn the setting of revision of failed primary MoM-TR, CTR may demonstrate advantages over UTR in improving functional outcomes and reducing key orthopaedic complications.     

Minimum 10 Year Survivorship Analysis of a Partially Coated Hydroxyapatite Tapered Femoral Stem in Elderly Patients With an Average Age Over 75

This is a retrospective, non-comparative study of 212 consecutive patients who underwent Total Hip Arthroplasty with an uncemented hydroxyapatite (HA) coated stem system from November 1997 to March 2000. The objective of the study was to analyze the performance of the implant at a minimum of 10 years in older patients (mean age 79.6 years). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the femoral stem at 10 years was 100%, and 97.5% for the whole prosthesis. The mean Merle d'Aubigné clinical score improved from 4.4 ± 2.1 points pre-operatively to 13.39 ± 3.77 points at final follow-up (p < 0.05), and the mean VAS score for thigh pain was 1.25. The radiographic analysis showed that there were no significant radiolucent lines or osteolysis compromising the fixation of the implant.     

Aseptic Loosening of the Monk hip Prosthesis

In a preliminary report concerning 104 Monk arthroplasties satisfactory results were found within an observation time of 1.6 years (Hansen & Rechnagel 1977). However an early tendency for aseptic loosening was recorded. At a follow-up of the same patients after 5 years it was found that 17 patients, with their primary prostheses in place, had died. of the remaining 86 prostheses not less than 50 per cent had been removed because of loosening causing symptoms. Furthermore at re-examination of 39 patients with 43 of the primary prostheses still in situ radiological and clinical evidence of progressive aseptic loosening was present.

The aetiology of the loosening is discussed and it is suggested that wear of the polyethylene cap plays an important role. It is concluded that the “soft top” Monk prosthesis cannot be recommended for replacement arthroplasty of the hip.     

Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients With Body Mass Index ≥35 kg/m2: A Contemporary Analysis of 812 Patients

BackgroundCemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to have higher failure rates in obese patients, and cementless TKA may provide more durable fixation. This study compared outcomes and survivorship of obese patients undergoing cemented and cementless TKA of the same modern design.MethodsWe identified a consecutive series of 406 primary cementless TKA performed in obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m² in 2013-2018. Each case was matched 1:1 with 406 cemented TKA based on age, sex, BMI, bearing surface, and year of surgery. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Short Form-12 were collected preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years. Implant survivorship was recorded at mean 4.0 years (range 2.0-7.8).ResultsThere was no difference in mean BMI between the cemented (38.6 ± 3.4 kg/m²; range, 35-60) and cementless cohorts (38.7 ± 3.3 kg/m²; range, 35-54; P = .706). Both groups had similar final postoperative scores and improvement in scores at 2 years. Furthermore, a similar percentage met the minimal clinically important difference (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, 70.0% vs 71.2%, P = .700; Short Form-12 Physical, 74.1% vs 70.4%, P = .240). Both groups demonstrated high 7-year survivorship free from aseptic revision (99.0% vs 99.5%, P = .665).ConclusionObese patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m² undergoing cementless and cemented TKA of the same modern design had similar outcomes and survivorship at early to mid-term follow-up. Continued surveillance of this high-risk population is necessary.     

Cemented vs Uncemented Femoral Components: A Randomized,Controlled Trial at 10 Years Minimum Follow-Up

BackgroundThe type of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) fixation (cemented or uncemented) is still subject to debate. The aim of this study is to assess the survival rate, clinical outcomes, and radiological results of TKA according to the fixation type.MethodsA total of 130 patients were randomly assigned to either the cement group (cemented femoral and tibial implants) or the hybrid group (cemented tibial implant, uncemented femoral implant). The inclusion criteria were patients between 50 and 90 years old who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis between 2004 and 2005 without a history of open knee surgery. Revisions and complications were reported, as well as clinical scores and radiological signs of loosening.ResultsOne hundred eighteen patients had complete data at 10 years of minimum follow-up (59 in each group). The mean age was 72 years old. The mean follow-up was 13 years. The survival rate was 98% at 13 years in both groups (1 aseptic loosening at 2 years in the cement group, 1 septic loosening in the hybrid group). The complication rate in the cement group was 8.5% (n = 5) vs 12.1% (n = 7) in the hybrid group (P = .8). The clinical results were not significantly different. In the cement group, 25% of patients (n = 15) had radiolucent lines at 10 years. In the hybrid group, 33% of patients had bone transparencies, not evolving or symptomatic.ConclusionAt a minimum follow-up of 10 years, there were no significant differences between cemented TKA and hybrid TKA for the survivorship, the complication rate, the clinical scores, or the radiological signs of loosening.Level of EvidenceI.     

Total Knee Arthroplasty with an Uncemented Trabecular Metal Tibial Component : A Registry-Based Analysis

Previous poor results have kept the appeal of uncemented total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) minimal. We analyzed the mid-term survivorship and reasons for failures of a contemporary uncemented porous tantalum monoblock tibial component nation-wide. During the study period (2003–2010), such tibial components were used in 1143 primary TKAs recorded in the Finnish Arthroplasty Registry. Seven-year survivorship of these TKAs was 100% (95% CI 99–100) with revision for aseptic loosening of the tibial component, and 97% (95% CI 96–98) with revision for any reason as the respective end points. The most common reasons for revisions were instability and prosthetic joint infections. In conclusion, TKAs using an uncemented porous tantalum monoblock tibial component showed excellent mid-term survivorship in a population-based setting.     

Outcome of uncemented trapeziometacarpal prosthesis for treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis

Background:

Osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint of thumb occurs frequently and can be very disabling. Numerous surgical techniques including trapeziectomy with or without tendon interposition arthrodesis and partial or total joint arthroplasty with cemented and noncemented prosthesis have been described for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Initial problems of osteolysis and implant loosening have been substantially reduced with improvement in implant design. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis of the thumb can be effectively treated with uncemented total joint replacement prosthesis.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively collected data for 16 trapeziometacarpal joint replacements in 14 patients. One patient was excluded as they required revision with trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction following fracture of Trapezium. The trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis was used in all cases and all operations were carried out by one surgeon. Clinical outcome was determined by a pre and postoperative patient rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and Michigan Hand Questionnaire Score. Range of motion, grip, tip pinch and key pinch strength were measured and compared with the unoperated hand. Radiological assessment was carried out by plain radiographs for preoperative staging of arthritis and postoperative radiographs at latest followup for evaluation of osteolysis and implant loosening. Average followup period was 26 months.

Results:

There was an improvement in hand function and pain level based on PRWE and Mischigan Hand outcome Questionnaire Score. One patient had intraoperative fracture of Trapezium and subsequent radiographs at 14 months followup showed loosening of the trapezial component due to nonunion of the fracture and complete disintegration of the trapezium. There were no cases of dislocation or implant loosening for the remaining 15 CMC joints at the latest followup.

Conclusion:

The use of uncemented prosthesis in treatment of Questionnaire Score. Range of motion joint osteoarthritis gives excellent short term results in improving hand function in terms of strength and stability and achieving pain relief.