脑出血继发损伤中沉默信息调节因子2的表达和炎症反应*

目的：探讨脑出血对酵母沉默信息调节因子2（Sirt2）和炎症的影响。方法：将胶原酶Ⅳ注入SD大鼠右侧 纹状体中建立脑出血模型，通过免疫印迹和ELISA 等方法测定大鼠脑出血后48 h 的Sirt2 的表达及炎症变化。利 用Hemin 诱导PC12 细胞损伤模拟体外脑出血模型，并检测Sirt2 及炎症变化；采用短发夹RNA（shRNA）-Sirt2 沉 默Sirt2 在PC12 细胞中的表达及对炎症的影响。结果：手术后48 h 脑出血行为学评分最低。脑出血组Sirt2 的表达 显著高于假手术组。脑出血组IL-6、IL-1β 表达显著升高。结论：脑出血可以促进Sirt2 的表达和炎症反应，降低 Sirt2 的表达可减缓炎症反应。 关键词 脑出血；沉默信息调节     

丙泊酚麻醉对老龄大鼠认知功能和海马神经元γ-氨基丁酸A受体表达的影响

目的观察丙泊酚麻醉对老龄大鼠认知功能及海马神经元γ-氨基丁酸A(GABA)受体表达的影响。方法50只SD老年大鼠随机分为丙泊酚组和对照组,每组25只。丙泊酚组大鼠腹腔注射1%丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳注射液6 mL/kg,对照组腹腔注射等体积的生理盐水。麻醉后1 d进行Morris水迷宫实验,分别采用HE染色和尼氏体染色观察海马区神经细胞及尼氏体(Nissl体)形态学变化,Western Blot检测GABA蛋白量表达。结果麻醉后,2组大鼠肛温、心率、呼吸频率、血氧饱和度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随着实验时间的延长,2组大鼠逃逸潜伏期、总里程数逐渐减小,丙泊酚组大鼠各时间点逃逸潜伏期、总里程均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。丙泊酚组大鼠穿越平台区域次数、时间小于、短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组海马区Nissl体存在于细胞浆及树突,染色较深,神经细胞排列整齐,形态规则;丙泊酚组Nissl体消失,神经细胞数量减少,细胞核破裂、丢失。丙泊酚组大鼠海马GABA蛋白表达量低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论丙泊酚对大鼠认知功能有影响,并与海马区GABA的表达相关。     

异丙酚和异氟醚对非体外循环搭桥术患者围术期细胞因子的影响

目的:研究异丙酚和异氟醚对非体外循环搭桥术患者围术期炎性与抗炎性细胞因子平衡的影响。方法:择期非体外循环搭桥患者50例,随机分为2组。异丙酚组微量泵输入剂量为4～6mg·kg-·1h-1,异氟醚组吸入浓度为1%～1.5%。检测诱导前、打开心包、旁路血管开放30min,术后2h、24h血清白细胞介素6(IL-6)、白细胞介素10(IL-10)和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)的浓度。结果:2组患者旁路血管开放后IL-6浓度较术前升高(P<0.01),术后2h达高峰;术后2h异氟醚组高于异丙酚组(P<0.05)。IL-10浓度变化趋势与IL-6相似,旁路血管开放后、术后2h和24h异丙酚组高于异氟醚组(P<0.05)。2组患者TNF-α水平均无显著变化。结论:异丙酚麻醉促进IL-10的产生,抑制IL-6的产生,控制术中应激反应异丙酚优于异氟醚。     

异丙酚与安氟醚或七氟醚静吸复合麻醉对心肌酶的影响

目的:观察异丙酚与安氟醚或七氟醚静吸复合麻醉对心肌酶的影响.方法:32例择期非心脏手术的全麻病人,随机分为4组(每组8例),分别给予安氟醚麻醉(A组)、七氟醚麻醉(B组)、异丙酚-安氟醚麻醉(C组)、异丙酚-七氟醚麻醉(D组).其中A、B组为对照组,C、D组为观察组.分别于麻醉前、麻醉诱导后2 h和术后3 d采集静脉血测血清磷酸肌酸激酶(CK)及其同功酶(CK-MB)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、α-羟丁酸脱氢酶(HBDH).结果:麻醉诱导后2 h,A组CK、CK-MB值、LDH及HBDH值升高,与麻醉前比较差异有显著性(P<0.01或P<0.05);B组CK和CK-MB值升高,与麻醉前比较差异有显著性(P<0.05或P<0.01).术后3 d,A、B两组CK值升高,与麻醉前和麻醉诱导后2 h比较差异有显著性(P<0.01或P<0.05),AST值升高,与麻醉前比较差异有显著性(P<0.01或P<0.05).而且A、B两组相比较,A组的CK、LDH值升高幅度明显大于B组(P<0.05).C、D两组仅CK值在术后3 d与麻醉前比较差异均有显著性(P<0.01),但其升高幅度均明显低于A、B两组的同时值(P<0.01),其余各项心肌酶的变化在麻醉诱导后2 h及术后3 d差异均无显著性(P>0.05).与C组比较,A组在麻醉诱导后2 h CK、CK-MB、HBDH值升高(P<0.01),LDH值升高(P<0.05);在术后3 d CK值升高(P<0.01).与D组比较,B组CK值在麻醉诱导后2 h及术后3 d升高(P<0.01),CK-MB值在麻醉诱导后2 h升高(P<0.05).结论:安氟醚和七氟醚两者均能使心肌酶升高,但安氟醚所致的心肌酶升高幅度更明显;临床麻醉剂量的异丙酚能有效地防止安氟醚和七氟醚麻醉时心肌酶的升高.     

丙泊酚对大鼠缺血再灌注肾NF-κB、TNF-α表达的影响

目的 研究丙泊酚对大鼠肢体缺血再灌注损伤后肾组织中肿瘤坏死因子-α（tumornecrosisfactor-α，TNF-α）、核因子-κB（nuclear factor-κxB，NF-κB）表达的影响。方法 24只SD雄性大鼠，随机分为假手术对照组（A组），肢体缺血再灌注组（B组）和丙泊酚干预组（C组），每组8只。采用免疫组织化学方法检测TNF-α、NF-κB的表达，行图像分析半定量。结果 B组大鼠肾组织中TNF-α、NF-κB的表达明显高于A组（P〈0．05），C组明显低于B组（P〈0．05）。结论 肢体缺血再灌注后有明显肾损伤，丙泊酚对肢体缺血再灌注肾损伤有一定程度的保护作用，其机制可能与下调大鼠肢体缺血再灌注损伤肾组织中TNF-α、NF-κB的过度表达有关。     

术前美托洛尔或咪唑安定对全麻诱导丙泊酚用量和血流动力学的影响

目的观察术前口服美托洛尔和肌注咪唑安定对麻醉诱导丙泊酚用量及血流动力学的影响。方法拟全麻行择期手术病人（ASAI-Ⅱ级）60例，随机分为美托洛尔组（Met组）、咪唑安定组（Mid组）和苯巴比妥钠组（Phe组）各20例，三组分别口服美托洛尔50mg、肌注咪唑安定0．04mg／kg、肌注苯巴比妥钠0．1g。以30mg·kg^-1·h^-1恒速推注丙泊酚直至病人入睡，随后静注芬太尼3μg／k，维库溴铵0．1mg／kg，辅助通气3min后进行气管插管。记录丙泊酚用量、入室、诱导前后、插管前后平均动脉压（MAP）和心率（HR）。结果Met组、Mid组、Phe组丙泊酚用量分别为1．36mg／kg±0．22mg／kg、1．40mg／kg±0．08mg／kg、1．61mg／kg±0．23mg／kg，与Phe组相比，Met组和Mid组丙泊酚用量减少（P〈0．01）。血流动力学变化：插管后组间对比Met组和Mid组MAP较Phe组低（P〈0．01）；插管后Mid组和Phe组HR基础值明显升高（P〈0．01或P〈0．05），而Met组无明显差异（P〉0．05）；插管后组间对比Met组和Mid组HR均比Phe组慢（P〈0．01）。结论术前口服美托洛尔或肌注咪唑安定与肌注苯巴比妥钠相比，均能减少丙泊酚诱导用量，但美托洛尔能更有效抑制血流动力学波动。     

靶控输注咪唑安定对靶控输注丙泊酚镇静催眠效应的影响

目的评价靶控输注咪唑安定对靶控输注丙泊酚镇静催眠效应的影响。方法ASAI～Ⅱ级择期手术患者40例，随机分为四组：A组为单纯丙泊酚组，B、C、D组为丙泊酚 咪唑安定组，咪唑安定靶浓度分别为10、20、30ng／mL。咪唑安定达到平衡后，血浆靶控输注丙泊酚。记录丙泊酚效应部位浓度为1、2、3、4、5μg／mL时BIS值和OAA／S评分，并记录OAA／S评分达到4、3、2、1时丙泊酚效应部位浓度和BIS值，记录BIS值为50时丙泊酚效应部位浓度。结果1．咪唑安定达到平衡后，C组和D组BIS值显著下降；D组中OAA／S评分也显著下降，并低于B组和C组；2．随丙泊酚浓度升高四组患者．BIS值和OAA／S评分逐渐下降；3．相同丙泊酚浓度时，BIS值和OAA／S评分随咪唑安定浓度增加呈降低趋势；4．B、C、D三组患者OAA／S评分达到3、2、1以及BIS值达到50时所需丙泊酚效应部位浓度均显著低于A组，达到相同OAA／S评分D组所需丙泊酚效应部位浓度显著低于B组和C组。结论效应部位浓度为10、20、30ng／mL的咪唑安定均能显著降低丙泊酚靶控浓度，以达到需要的镇静深度；随咪唑安定浓度加深，降低作用越明显。     

The use of propofol and alfentanil by infusion in military anaesthesia

A total intravenous technique using propofol and alfentanil was used successfully in four battlefield casualties treated at a British Military Field Hospital during the recent Gulf conflict. All patients made a rapid recovery of adequate quality for prompt evacuation. We believe that the use of propofol and alfentanil as an induction and maintenance regimen for military anaesthesia merits further evaluation and comparison with established techniques.     

Intubating conditions provided by propofol and alfentanil - acceptable, but not ideal

Background: The use of muscle relaxants to facilitate intubation is associated with several side effects regardless of whether depolarizing or non-depolarizing drugs are used. In the present study we compared the intubating conditions, haemodynamic responses and changes in oxygen saturation following induction with alfentanil and propofol or alfentanil, thiopental and suxamethonium.
Methods: Eighty patients (ASA I or II) were in a double-blind manner assigned to receive either of the two induction methods. Intubating conditions were assessed on the basis of jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the endotracheal tube and coughing on intubation. Heart rate, systolic arterial pressure and oxygen saturation were monitored throughout the procedure.
Results: The use of alfentanil and propofol resulted in significantly lower scored intubation points. Systolic arterial pressure decreased and heart rate increased significantly in the alfentanil-thiopental-suxamethonium group as compared to the alfentanil-propofol group. There were no significant changes in oxygen saturation.
Conclusion: The results show that propofol and alfentanil in combination provides haemodynamic stability and unaltered oxygen saturation but less optimal intubating conditions.     

An audit of adverse events in children sedated with chloral hydrate or propofol during imaging studies

We examined records of sedations provided by the paediatric anaesthesiology staff for 455 children (ages 1 mo-17 yr) undergoing MRI or CT scans at our institution over a twelve-month period with regard to the monitoring of adverse events: excessive sedation, agitation, vomiting, hypoxaemia, and major airway compromise. One hundred-and-thirty-one patients (29%) received chloral hydrate; 324 patients (71%) received propofol. All patients were monitored with continuous noninvasive pulse oximetry and received supplemental oxygen via nasal cannulae. Of the patients who received chloral hydrate, 64 (49%) were over one year of age; of the patients who received propofol, 318 (98%) were one year of age or older. In the chloral hydrate group, 23 patients (19%) were deemed excessively sedated and four patients (3%) were agitated; no patients in the propofol group experienced any of the adverse outcomes reviewed. Furthermore, no patients in either group had significant airway compromise and none was admitted to the hospital as a result of the sedation.