黄利兴辨治失眠浅析

黄利兴临床善治失眠,其认为阳不入阴为失眠的总病机,主要病机包括心神失养、心神受扰、肝不藏魂等。任何影响心肝神魂安定的因素均可成为失眠的病因。黄利兴根据失眠的不同临床表现,将失眠分成入睡困难型失眠、多梦型失眠、浅睡型失眠、早醒型失眠及彻夜难眠型睡眠进行辨证论治。     

MRI STIR序列对非神经根源性腰痛患者的诊断价值

【摘要】 目的：观察MRI检查中短T1反转回复（short T1 inversion-recovery,STIR）成像技术对于非神经根源性腰痛患者腰椎退变性病变的显示能力,评价其临床应用价值。方法：2010年9月～2011年6月对在我院就诊的有腰痛症状但无神经根放射痛症状的患者进行腰椎MRI扫描,共纳入130例患者,其中男89例,女41例,年龄17~81岁,平均48.3±16.0岁。病史均超过1年。MRI扫描序列包括：矢状面TSE-T1WI、TSE-T2WI、STIR序列,横断面TSE-T2WI序列。对STIR图像及TSE-T2WI图像上腰椎退变性病变进行观察,观察内容包括：L1～S1椎间盘退变情况、椎间盘突出/膨出的节段及程度、腰椎小关节骨质增生情况、棘间韧带水肿情况和腰背部皮下软组织水肿情况。分别对STIR序列与TSE-T2WI序列发现腰椎间盘退变、椎间盘突出/膨出、椎小关节病变、腰部软组织病变的能力进行比较。结果：130例非神经根源性腰痛患者中,STIR序列对于腰椎间盘退变、棘间韧带水肿及腰背部皮下软组织水肿的检出数分别为482个、118节和25例,TSE-T2WI序列检出311个、42节和8例,两序列检出率有显著性差异（P<0.05）;STIR与TSE-T2WI序列对于腰椎间盘突出/膨出和椎小关节骨质增生的检出数均为182个和71个,无差异。两序列均发现5例腰椎滑脱,19例腰椎管狭窄。结论：MRI STIR序列对非神经根源性腰痛患者腰椎间盘退变、棘间韧带水肿及腰背部皮下软组织水肿显示能力优于MRI T2WI。     

固原市医疗机构消毒质量调查

目的加强医疗单位消毒、灭菌工作,进一步规范化管理,有效地预防和控制院内感染,保证医疗安全。方法采取检查、现场采样的方法对全市52家医疗单位消毒质量进行检测。结果共采样682份,合格518份,平均总合格率75.95%。结论各级医疗单位消毒灭菌工作均存在不同程度缺陷,应依相关法律、法规针对性规范消毒灭菌管理。     

Bryan颈人工椎间盘置换术失败原因分析

Objective To analyze the failed Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty and to improve its re-sults. Methods From October 2004 to October 2007, 48 patients underwent Bryan cervical disc arthro-plasty. All patients were followed up 2 to 38 months(mean 18 months). Among them, 4 failed cases were an-alyzed, which include 1 male and 3 females, with the age of 42, 51, 40, 49 years. Results Case 1 reported the brachial plexus injury as the result of the patient's shoulders being overstretched while fixing his position during operation, the muscular power of both upper extremities declining to degree Ⅱ and Ⅲ upon operation completion, which was restored to degree 4 when discharged from hospital (45 days after operation). Case 2 reported the compression on the spinal cord as the result of failure to remove the ossification of posterior lon-gitudinal ligament (OPLL) which had been identified by the preoperative CT; the patient complained of no release of symptoms after the operation and postoperative CT showed that compression still existed. Case 3 reported incomplete spinal cord injury caused by massive bleeding during decompression, a function of ex-tremely small vertebral canal anteroposterior diameter (5 mm shown in preoperative MRI); the muscular pow-er of left extremity dropped to degree 0 upon operation completion; the patient could walk with crutch 10 days after operation. Case 4 reported'heterotopic ossification (OP) which occurred 1 year after operation and became deteriorated 2 years later, but did not affect the motion of prosthesis. Conclusion Bryan disc arthroplasty is being extensively used as an effective procedure for decompression and reconstruction of the cervical disc. Excellent clinical results are related to strict selection of indications, perioperative manage-ment, and the experience and surgical technique of the surgeon are also important to the final outcome.     

Bryan颈人工椎间盘置换术失败原因分析

目的 对Bryan颈人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎病的失败原因进行分析.方法 2004年10月至2007年10月,采用Bryan颈人工椎间盘对48例颈椎病患者的56个椎间盘进行治疗,其中单节段40例,双节段8例.术后随访2～38个月,平均18个月.手术失败4例,男1例,女3例;年龄分别为42、51、40、49岁.患者均为经6周的保守治疗无效后行Bryan颈人工椎间盘置换.结果 1例全麻后在用胶带固定患者体位的过程中造成对臂丛的过度牵拉,术后双上肢肌力下降到2～3级.1例术前CT及MRI显示C4～C6水平后纵韧带骨化,其中C4,5节段骨桥形成,向后方压迫脊髓;手术切除部分骨化后纵韧带,使之漂浮;术后患者症状无改善,并出现锥体束征阳性,复查CT及MRI示存在骨化后纵韧带压迫脊髓.1例术前MRI显示C4-5椎间盘突出,椎管前后径约为5 mm,C4,5水平脊髓变性;术中向外侧减压时致椎管内静脉破裂,出血影响术野;术后左侧肢体肌力下降至0级.1例术后1年发现假体后方异位骨化,但不影响关节活动.结论 臂丛损伤、减压不彻底、术中椎管内静脉出血和异位骨化可能是引起颈椎人工椎间盘置换术失败的主要原因.     

浅议医院统计管理信息网络化建设和作用

本文主要讲述了医院统计管理的信息化网络化的作用:医院统计管理的信息化网络化给登录者带来的便利;医院统计管理的信息化网络化对医院现代化建设起到重要作用;医院统计管理的信息化网络化的建设。     

高位腰椎间盘突出症的手术治疗

目的：探讨高位腰椎间盘突出症的手术治疗方法。方法：37例高位腰椎间盘突出症患者中，男25例，女12例：年龄38～65岁，平均54．3岁；L1／2 7例，L2／3 13例；L3／4 17例。22例行双侧小关节切除自体小关节骨及cage后路椎间融合椎弓根钉内固定术，15例行前路椎间盘切除植骨融合钛板内固定术。应用JOA评分评价患者手术前后及随访时的神经功能，总结手术并发症，观察植骨融合情况。结果：后路手术患者中2例硬脊膜撕裂．1例椎弓根螺钉位置偏斜；前路手术患者中1例硬脊膜破裂，2例术后出现单侧神经根麻痹，1例术后出现难控制性呃逆。随访24～66个月，平均43．5个月，JOA评分由术前11．85&#177;2．41分提高到随访时的25．34&#177;3．23分，优良率为83．78％；其中前路手术者JOA评分由11．92&#177;2．53改善到24．49&#177;3．19分，优良率为80．00％；后路手术者由11．71&#177;2．34改善到25．83&#177;3．41分，优良率86．36％。无内固定物松动、断裂等并发症发生，后路手术者骨性融合率为95．45％，前路手术者骨性融合率为93．33％。结论：高位腰椎间盘突出症采用手术治疗是必要的，前或后路手术均可取得良好的疗效。     

Bryan颈人工椎间盘置换术失败原因分析

Objective To analyze the failed Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty and to improve its re-sults. Methods From October 2004 to October 2007, 48 patients underwent Bryan cervical disc arthro-plasty. All patients were followed up 2 to 38 months(mean 18 months). Among them, 4 failed cases were an-alyzed, which include 1 male and 3 females, with the age of 42, 51, 40, 49 years. Results Case 1 reported the brachial plexus injury as the result of the patient's shoulders being overstretched while fixing his position during operation, the muscular power of both upper extremities declining to degree Ⅱ and Ⅲ upon operation completion, which was restored to degree 4 when discharged from hospital (45 days after operation). Case 2 reported the compression on the spinal cord as the result of failure to remove the ossification of posterior lon-gitudinal ligament (OPLL) which had been identified by the preoperative CT; the patient complained of no release of symptoms after the operation and postoperative CT showed that compression still existed. Case 3 reported incomplete spinal cord injury caused by massive bleeding during decompression, a function of ex-tremely small vertebral canal anteroposterior diameter (5 mm shown in preoperative MRI); the muscular pow-er of left extremity dropped to degree 0 upon operation completion; the patient could walk with crutch 10 days after operation. Case 4 reported'heterotopic ossification (OP) which occurred 1 year after operation and became deteriorated 2 years later, but did not affect the motion of prosthesis. Conclusion Bryan disc arthroplasty is being extensively used as an effective procedure for decompression and reconstruction of the cervical disc. Excellent clinical results are related to strict selection of indications, perioperative manage-ment, and the experience and surgical technique of the surgeon are also important to the final outcome.     

Bryan颈人工椎间盘置换术失败原因分析

Objective To analyze the failed Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty and to improve its re-sults. Methods From October 2004 to October 2007, 48 patients underwent Bryan cervical disc arthro-plasty. All patients were followed up 2 to 38 months(mean 18 months). Among them, 4 failed cases were an-alyzed, which include 1 male and 3 females, with the age of 42, 51, 40, 49 years. Results Case 1 reported the brachial plexus injury as the result of the patient's shoulders being overstretched while fixing his position during operation, the muscular power of both upper extremities declining to degree Ⅱ and Ⅲ upon operation completion, which was restored to degree 4 when discharged from hospital (45 days after operation). Case 2 reported the compression on the spinal cord as the result of failure to remove the ossification of posterior lon-gitudinal ligament (OPLL) which had been identified by the preoperative CT; the patient complained of no release of symptoms after the operation and postoperative CT showed that compression still existed. Case 3 reported incomplete spinal cord injury caused by massive bleeding during decompression, a function of ex-tremely small vertebral canal anteroposterior diameter (5 mm shown in preoperative MRI); the muscular pow-er of left extremity dropped to degree 0 upon operation completion; the patient could walk with crutch 10 days after operation. Case 4 reported'heterotopic ossification (OP) which occurred 1 year after operation and became deteriorated 2 years later, but did not affect the motion of prosthesis. Conclusion Bryan disc arthroplasty is being extensively used as an effective procedure for decompression and reconstruction of the cervical disc. Excellent clinical results are related to strict selection of indications, perioperative manage-ment, and the experience and surgical technique of the surgeon are also important to the final outcome.