Comparison of Transcallosal Inhibition Between Hemispheres and Its Relationship with Motor Behavior in Patients with Severe Upper Extremity Impairment After Subacute Stroke

ObjectiveTo compare corticospinal excitability and transcallosal inhibition between contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) and ipsilesional M1. We also investigated the correlation between transcallosal inhibition and upper extremity motor behavior.Materials and methods19 individuals with unilateral ischemic subacute stroke who had severe upper extremity impairment participated in this study. Corticospinal excitability was assessed by measuring the resting motor threshold, active motor threshold and motor evoked potential amplitude. Transcallosal inhibition was investigated by measuring the duration and depth of the ipsilateral silent period (ISP). The data from the two hemispheres were compared and the relationships of transcallosal inhibition with upper extremity motor impairment, grip strength and pinch strength were analyzed.ResultsResting motor threshold (p = 0.001) and active motor threshold (p = 0.001) were lower and motor evoked potential amplitude was higher (p = 0.001) in the contralesional M1 compared to the ipsilesional M1. However, there were no differences between the two M1s in ISP duration (p = 0.297) or ISP depth (p =0. 229). Transcallosal inhibition from the contralesional M1 was positively associated with motor impairment (ISP duration, p = 0.003; ISP depth, p = 0.017) and grip strength (ISP duration, p = 0.016; ISP depth, p = 0.045).ConclusionsSymmetric transcallosal inhibition between hemispheres and positive association of transcallosal inhibition from contralesional M1 with upper extremity motor behavior indicate that recruitment of contralesional M1 may be necessary for recovery in patients with severe upper extremity impairment after subacute ischemic stroke.     

The STING activator c-di-AMP exerts superior adjuvant properties than the formulation poly(I:C)/CpG after subcutaneous vaccination with soluble protein antigen or DEC-205-mediated antigen targeting to dendritic cells

Vaccination is the most efficient strategy to protect from infectious diseases and the induction of a protective immune response not only depends on the nature of the antigen, but is also influenced by the vaccination strategy and the co-administration of adjuvants. Therefore, the precise monitoring of adjuvant candidates and their immune modulatory properties is a crucial step in vaccine development. Here, one central aspect is the induction of appropriate humoral and cellular effector mechanisms.In our study we performed a direct comparison of two promising candidates in adjuvant development, the STING activator bis-(3,5)-cyclic dimeric adenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP) and the Toll-like receptor ligand formulation poly(I:C)/CpG. These were evaluated in C57BL/6 mice using the model antigen ovalbumin (OVA) in subcutaneous vaccination with soluble protein as well as in a dendritic cell (DC) targeting approach (αDEC-OVA). Strikingly, c-di-AMP as compared to poly(I:C)/CpG resulted in significantly higher antigen-specific IgG antibody levels when used in immunization with soluble OVA as well as in antigen targeting to DC. In vaccination with soluble OVA, c-di-AMP induced a significantly stronger CTL, Th1 and IFNγ-producing CD8⁺ memory T cell response than poly(I:C)/CpG. The response was CTL and Th1 cell dominated, a profile shared by both adjuvants. In the context of targeting OVA to DC, c-di-AMP induced significantly increased Th1 and Th2 cell responses as compared to poly(I:C)/CpG. Interestingly, the Th1 response dominated the overall T cell response only when c-di-AMP was used, indicating a distinct modulatory property of c-di-AMP when the DC targeting immunization approach was exploited.Taken together, we describe superior properties of c-di-AMP as compared to poly(I:C)/CpG in subcutaneous vaccination with soluble antigen as well as antigen targeting to DC. This indicates exceptionally effective adjuvant properties for c-di-AMP and provides compelling evidence of its potential for further adjuvant development, especially also when using DC targeting approaches.     

Investigating the association between eye colour and the Neurological Pupil index

IntroductionBrown or dark brown eyes make it difficult to distinguish the contrast between a black pupil and the surrounding iris, which may result in clinical assessment errors. The pupillometer can be used to derive an indexed value, the Neurological Pupil index™ (NPi) for pupillary light reflex. However, there are limited data associating the NPi and iris colour. We examine the NPi and eye colour association.MethodsData were pooled from the Establishing Normative Data for Pupillometer Assessments in Neuroscience Intensive Care (END-PANIC) Registry. The analysis includes 14,168 observations collected from 865 patients with neurological conditions who were admitted to the intensive care unit. Summary statistics and statistical models were developed to examine the association using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) summary procedure.ResultsThe mean age of the cohort was 56 years (standard deviation = 17). Eye colour included dark brown (n = 339), blue (n = 234), brown (n = 173), green (n = 82), and other (n = 37). There was significant differences (p < 0.0001) between mean NPi values by eye colour [blue = 4.08 (0.92), brown = 3.34 (1.45), dark = 3.71 (1.33), green = 4.08 (0.67), other = 3.76 (1.25)]. However, a further random-effects mixed model after controlling for confounding variables revealed no significant difference in NPi values among different eye colour groups.ConclusionsThe pupillary light reflex, when assessed using the pupillometer, is not dependent on the eye colour. Practitioners are not required to consider eye colour as a confounder when they perform pupillary assessment for examining patients with neurological conditions.     

A modality-specific somatosensory evoked potential test protocol for clinical evaluation: A feasibility study

ObjectiveWe aimed to establish an objective neurophysiological test protocol that can be used to assess the somatosensory nervous system.MethodsIn order to assess most fiber subtypes of the somatosensory nervous system, repetitive stimuli of seven different modalities (touch, vibration, pinprick, cold, contact heat, laser, and warmth) were synchronized with the electroencephalogram (EEG) and applied on the cheek and dorsum of the hand and dorsum of the foot in 21 healthy subjects and three polyneuropathy (PNP) patients. Latencies and amplitudes of the modalities were assessed and compared. Patients received quantitative sensory testing (QST) as reference.ResultsWe found reproducible evoked potentials recordings for touch, vibration, pinprick, contact-heat, and laser stimuli. The recording of warm-evoked potentials was challenging in young healthy subjects and not applicable in patients. Latencies were shortest within Aβ-fiber-mediated signals and longest within C-fibers. The test protocol detected function loss within the Aβ-fiber and Aδ-fiber-range in PNP patients. This function loss corresponded with QST findings.ConclusionIn this pilot study, we developed a neurophysiological test protocol that can specifically assess most of the somatosensory modalities. Despite technical challenges, initial patient data appear promising regarding a possible future clinical application.SignificanceEstablished and custom-made stimulators were combined to assess different fiber subtypes of the somatosensory nervous system using modality-specific evoked potentials.     

Sepsis after elective neurosurgery: Incidence,outcomes, and predictive factors

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition resulting from systemic infection, with mortality rates approaching 30%. Most neurological surgeries are now performed electively, which permits medical optimization preoperatively. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 122,466 adult elective neurosurgical patients from 2012 to 2018 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. To select for a medically optimized population, patients were included if they arrived from home on the day of surgery, were not pregnant or puerperium, and had no documented evidence of preexisting infection. We analyzed demographic, comorbidity, and operative information; performed multivariate logistic regression to explore factors predictive of postoperative sepsis; and evaluated outcomes for patients who developed sepsis. Overall, 0.87% of patients developed postoperative sepsis (n = 1,067). The rate of sepsis was higher in the cranial subpopulation (1.21%; n = 330) and lower in the spinal subpopulation (0.77%; n = 733). The overall sepsis cohort was older, had more males, was more functionally dependent, had longer operation durations, and had higher rates of medical comorbidities. Minority race and smoking were not associated with sepsis. The sepsis cohort fared worse than the control cohort across all outcome measures, including prolonged length-of-stay (≥90^th percentile), discharge anywhere but home, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, and 30-day mortality. Results for the cranial and spine subpopulations follow similar trends. In summary, sepsis in the elective neurosurgical population is an uncommon but devastating cause of excess morbidity and mortality.     

Cortical mechanisms underlying variability in intermittent theta-burst stimulation-induced plasticity: A TMS-EEG study

ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) variability depends on the ability to engage specific neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1).MethodsIn a sham-controlled interventional study on 31 healthy volunteers, we used concomitant transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG). We compared baseline motor evoked potentials (MEPs), M1 iTBS-evoked EEG oscillations, and resting-state EEG (rsEEG) between subjects who did and did not show MEP facilitation following iTBS. We also investigated whether baseline MEP and iTBS-evoked EEG oscillations could explain inter and intraindividual variability in iTBS aftereffects.ResultsThe facilitation group had smaller baseline MEPs than the no-facilitation group and showed more iTBS-evoked EEG oscillation synchronization in the alpha and beta frequency bands. Resting-state EEG power was similar between groups and iTBS had a similar non-significant effect on rsEEG in both groups. Baseline MEP amplitude and beta iTBS-evoked EEG oscillation power explained both inter and intraindividual variability in MEP modulation following iTBS.ConclusionsThe results show that variability in iTBS-associated plasticity depends on baseline corticospinal excitability and on the ability of iTBS to engage M1 beta oscillations.SignificanceThese observations can be used to optimize iTBS investigational and therapeutic applications.