胸段食管癌累及野放疗与扩大野放疗对危及器官的辐射剂量学分析

目的 研究胸段食管癌逆向调强放射治疗（IMRT）中累及野照射与扩大野照射对危及器官（OAR）受照剂量的影响。方法 40例胸段食管癌患者分别行累及野靶区勾画和扩大野靶区勾画并勾画危及器官，制定IMRT计划，评估2个计划的靶区适形指数（CI）和均匀性指数（HI）及危及器官的剂量学参数，剂量学参数比较采用配对t检验。结果 2种计划的PTV均能满足处方剂量要求，PTV在CI、HI上相近（P = 0.317、0.130）。两组间平均肺剂量、两肺V₅、两肺V₂₀、两肺V₃₀、脊髓D_mean、心脏D_mean、心脏D_max、心脏V₃₀、心脏V₄₀、心脏V₆₀差异均存在统计学意义（P < 0.01）。结论 胸段食管癌患者行累及野照射与扩大野比较，可降低正常器官的受照剂量，从而降低放射性损伤风险。     

几何不确定性鲁棒优化在肝癌立体定向放疗中的应用

目的:分析基于几何不确定性的鲁棒优化计划对肝癌立体定向放疗（SBRT）剂量分布的影响。方法:选取12例肝癌SBRT患者，对每例制作3个调强计划:①基于PTV（ITV-PTV 5 mm）的常规优化（PTV-Based Plan）；②基于ITV非均匀几何不确定性（本中心计算的不确定性值:进出方向7 mm，左右和前后方向4 mm）的鲁棒优化（Robust Planactual）；③基于ITV均匀5 mm几何不确定性的鲁棒优化（Robust Plan5 mm）。所有计划都以95%的PTV满足处方剂量作为目标，以等中心均匀偏移4、5、7 mm计算扰动剂量评估鲁棒性。结果:计划①②③的均匀性指数（HI）分别为0.083±0.027、0.099±0.035、0.096±0.026，不具有统计学意义；计划①②③的适形性指数（CI）分别为0.98±0.02、1.02±0.05、1.00±0.04，计划②③相对于计划①的CI具有统计学意义。计划③的正常肝组织平均受量和V2500相对于计划①②分别下降了4.1%、2.5%和5.4%、3.0%，且具有统计学意义（P=0.034、P=0.021和P=0.004、P=0.004），计划②相对于计划①的正常肝组织平均受量和V2500不具有统计学意义（P=0.308和P=0.182），但下降了1.6%和2.5%。对于其鲁棒性，计划②③的5 mm-D99%、5 mm-D98%、5 mm-D95%的剂量-体积直方图带宽（DVHBW）差值相对于计划①更小，随着摆位不确定度的增大，其DVHBW差值越大。结论:在肝脏SBRT治疗中，采用鲁棒优化能够提高靶区剂量分布质量，即使在摆位不确定度有所增加的情况下，仍可以保证ITV的剂量覆盖同时不增加正常组织的照射剂量。     

Surgical resection after neoadjuvant durvalumab and radiation is feasible and safe in non–small cell lung cancer: Results from a randomized trial

ObjectiveSeveral trials have recently reported the safety of pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy with encouraging major pathological response rates. We report the detailed adverse events profile from a recently conducted randomized phase II trial in patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer treated with neoadjuvant durvalumab alone or with sub-ablative radiation.MethodsWe conducted a randomized phase II trial in patients with non–small cell lung cancer clinical stages I to IIIA who were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant durvalumab alone or with sub-ablative radiation (8Gyx3). Secondary end points included the safety of 2 cycles of preoperative durvalumab with and without radiation followed by pulmonary resection. Postoperative adverse events within 30 days were recorded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0).ResultsSixty patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, with planned resection performed in 26 patients in each arm. Baseline demographics and clinical variables were balanced between groups. The median operative time was similar between arms: 128 minutes (97-201) versus 146 minutes (109-214) (P = .314). There was no 30- or 90-day mortality. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 10 of 26 patients (38%) after monotherapy and in 10 of 26 patients (38%) after dual therapy. Anemia requiring transfusion and hypotension were the 2 most common adverse events. The median length of stay was similar between arms (5 days vs 4 days, P = .172).ConclusionsIn this randomized trial, the addition of sub-ablative focal radiation to durvalumab in the neoadjuvant setting was not associated with increased mortality or morbidity compared with neoadjuvant durvalumab alone.     

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary liver tumors: An effective liver-directed therapy in the toolbox

The use of radiation for primary liver cancers has historically been limited because of the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. Treatment fields have become more conformal because of several technical advances, and this has allowed for dose escalation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, is now able to safely treat liver tumors to ablative doses while sparing functional liver parenchyma by using highly conformal therapy. Several retrospective and small prospective studies have examined the use of SBRT for liver cancers; however, there is a lack of well-powered randomized studies to definitively guide management in these settings. Recent advances in systemic therapy for primary liver cancers have improved outcomes; however, the optimal selection criteria for SBRT as a local therapy remain unclear among other liver-directed options such as radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization.     

A systematic review of axillary nodal irradiation for the management of the axilla in patients with early-stage breast cancer

BackgroundGiven numerous publications and clinical trials regarding axillary management in breast cancer, we sought to summarize this complex literature to help clarify this field for clinicians. This systematic review focuses on the role of irradiation of the axillary nodes (locoregional nodal irradiation [LRNI]) in the management of the axilla in patients with early-stage breast cancer in various clinical settings.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, the Cochrane library, the proceedings of the ASCO, the ASTRO, the ESMO, the ESTRO, and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (2016–2019) meetings. The quality of the studies was assessed with design-specific tools. The study was registered in PROSPERO.ResultsWe included one systematic review, one individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis, and five randomized controlled trials (RCTs). After axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), LRNI resulted in small benefits in breast cancer specific mortality, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastases-free survival but not overall survival. After a positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), LRNI may provide equivalent locoregional control and disease-free survival (DFS) compared to ALND with a lower risk of lymphedema. No randomized data is available for the neoadjuvant setting.ConclusionsThe summary of the role of radiation, is relevant to radiation oncologists for choosing the correct cohort of patient requiring LRNI and to surgeons making clinical decisions regarding the timing and type of breast reconstruction offered to patients.     

Metastasis-directed Therapy in Prostate Cancer: Prognostic Significance of the ESTRO/EORTC Classification in Oligometastatic Bone Disease

AimsOligometastatic disease (OMD) represents a spectrum of clinical scenarios and various classification systems have been proposed. Bone-only OMD can occur in patients with advanced prostate cancer and validated decision-making tools are needed to assist patient selection for metastasis-directed therapy. The aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic utility of a classification system for OMD.Materials and methodsA retrospective review was conducted of all patients with bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) since November 2011. SBRT was delivered using CyberKnife® and gantry-based linear accelerator platforms. All patients were classified into oligometastatic states based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (ESTRO/EORTC) classification system. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were carried out to determine the prognostic utility of this classification system.ResultsIn total, 105 patients with 145 osseous metastases were treated over 119 sessions. The median follow-up after SBRT was 23 months (interquartile range 10–39.8). Twelve patients had died after a median time of 31 months. The 3-year metastatic progression-free survival was 23% (95% confidence interval 13–32) and the 3-year overall survival was 88% (95% confidence interval 80–96). Patients in a metachronous oligometastatic state were 4.50 (95% confidence interval 1.19–17.10, P = 0.03) times more likely to experience metastatic progression compared with those with synchronous oligometastases, and 6.69 (95% confidence interval 1.05–42.50, P = 0.04) times more likely to experience any failure. Hazard ratio magnitudes increased for patients in a repeat oligometastatic state. The multivariate model for both metastatic progression-free survival and failure-free survival found prostate-specific antigen doubling time <4 months (P = 0.002; P = 0.05) to independently predict for progression.ConclusionThe ESTRO/EORTC classification of OMD predicts for progression in patients treated with SBRT for bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer at our institution. Further validation in prospective series over multiple tumour sites is needed. These characterisation factors should be assessed in patients considered for metastasis-directed therapy together with established prognostic features.     

Microwave Ablation versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

PurposeTo assess the cost effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with inoperable stage I non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and MethodsA literature search was performed in MEDLINE with broad search clusters. A decision-analytic model was constructed over a 5-year period. The model incorporated treatment-related complications and long-term recurrence. All clinical parameters were derived from the literature with preference to long-term prospective trials. A healthcare payers’ perspective was adopted. Outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) extracted from prior studies and U.S. dollars from Medicare reimbursements and prior studies. Base case calculations, probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, and multiple 1- and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsMWA yielded a health benefit of 2.31 QALYs at a cost of $195,331, whereas SBRT yielded a health benefit of 2.33 QALYs at a cost of $225,271. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $1,480,597/QALY, indicating that MWA is the more cost-effective strategy. The conclusion remains unchanged in probabilistic sensitivity analysis with MWA being the optimal cost strategy in 99.84% simulations. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that MWA remains cost effective when its annual recurrence risk is <18.4% averaged over 5 years, when the SBRT annual recurrence risk is >1.44% averaged over 5 years, or when MWA is at least $7,500 cheaper than SBRT.ConclusionsMWA appears to be more cost effective than SBRT for patients with inoperable stage I NSCLC.     

Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: How Far Can We Go?

Following adoption of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy as a standard for localised prostate cancer, ultrahypofractioned radiotherapy delivered in five to seven fractions is rapidly being embraced by clinical practice and international guidelines. However, the question remains: how low can we go? Can radiotherapy for prostate cancer be delivered in fewer than five fractions? The current review summarises the evidence that radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer can be safely and effectively delivered in fewer than five fractions using high dose rate brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy. We also discuss important lessons learned from the single-fraction high dose rate brachytherapy experience.     

直肠癌新辅助放疗研究进展

在过去的近40年里，直肠癌的治疗方案逐渐标准化。大多数早期直肠癌患者仅通过手术即可得到充分的治疗。然而，相当比例的直肠癌患者处于局部进展期，此类患者需要行新辅助治疗。直肠癌的新辅助放射治疗已被证明能有效地降低患者术前肿瘤分期、改善患者生存以及降低直肠癌局部复发率等，随之而来的是患者放疗后出现的不同程度的放疗不良反应，但随着放射治疗规范化、放射治疗技术及设备的改进，放疗不良反应严重程度在逐渐降低。本文就新辅助放疗中的放疗方案的选择、放射治疗技术、放疗不良反应、放疗后的手术时间以及放疗后的观察与等待等问题的最新研究进展进行了系统性的综述，从而为临床直肠癌新辅助治疗提供有力依据。     

中耳胆脂瘤手术ICD-9-CM-3编码分析

手术治疗特别是中耳病变切除联合鼓室成形术是目前根治中耳胆脂瘤最主要的方法,依据2012年版的中耳炎手术分型指南内容,按照手术对外耳道后壁和鼓窦上鼓室侧壁处理方式不同,中耳病变切除具体类型和对应ICD-9-CM-3编码为:完壁式乳突根治术20.4900x009、开放式乳突根治术20.4900x008、完桥式乳突根治术20.49和上鼓室鼓窦切开术20.4900x007等,为避免上述手术编码的混淆,编码员应掌握每种术式的具体内涵。同时对于重要的其它手术操作如鼓室成形术19.4~19.5、耳甲腔成形术18.79、外耳道后壁重建术18.6和乳突缩窄术20.92等也不能漏编和多编。编码员应加强中耳结构和手术知识的学习,当不能确定手术具体类型时,应与耳鼻喉医师沟通,确定正确手术类型和内容时方可编码。