慢加急性肝功能衰竭患者心理合并症的配对病例-对照研究

目的：探讨慢加急性肝功能衰竭（ACLF）患者心理状况及与其他慢性肝脏疾病患者心理症状差异。方法采用病例对照研究,纳入40例 HBV相关ACLF患者,以年龄、性别因素分别匹配40例 HBV相关肝硬化患者、40例慢性乙型肝炎（CHB）患者及40例健康对照,采用描述性分析方法分析不同组间患者心理症状差异。结果汉密顿抑郁量表评分结果提示,HBV 相关 ACLF 组、HBV 相关肝硬化组评分均高于 CHB 组与健康对照组。症状自评量表（SCL-90）评分显示除敌对和偏执2个维度评分无差异,其他8个维度差异均具有统计学意义。结论 HBV相关ACLF患者抑郁程度和精神神经状况较CHB和健康对照组更严重。     

Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) and the Liver

Within a year of its emergence, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has evolved into a pandemic. What has emerged during the past 1 year is that, apart from its potentially fatal respiratory presentation from which the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) derives its name, it presents with a myriad of gastrointestinal (GI) and liver manifestations. Expression of the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) receptor throughout the GI tract and liver, which is the receptor for the SARS-CoV-2, may be responsible for the GI and liver manifestations. Besides acting directly via the ACE-2 receptor, the virus triggers a potent immune response, which might have a role in pathogenesis. The virus leads to derangement in liver function tests in close to 50% of the patients. The impact of these derangements in patients with a normal underlying liver seems to be innocuous. Severe clinical presentations include acute decompensation and acute-on-chronic liver failure in a patient with chronic liver disease, leading to high mortality. Evolving data suggests that, contrary to intuition, liver transplant recipients and patients with autoimmune liver disease on immunosuppression do not have increased mortality. The exact mechanism underlying why immunosuppressed patients fare well as compared to other patients remains to be deciphered. With newer variants of COVID-19, which can spread faster than the original strain, the data on hepatic manifestations needs to be updated to keep a step ahead of the virus.     

Hdac1 Regulates Differentiation of Bipotent Liver Progenitor Cells During Regeneration via Sox9b and Cdk8

1. Download high-res image (250KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Child-Pugh,MELD, and ALBI scores for predicting the in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

Objectives: Our study aimed to evaluate the discriminative abilities of Child-Pugh, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores in predicting the in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

Methods: Cirrhotic patients with ACLF admitted between 2010 January and 2014 June were retrospectively reviewed. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: One hundred patients were eligible for the Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) criteria. AUROCs of Child-Pugh, MELD, and ALBI scores in predicting the in-hospital mortality was 0.63 (95%CI: 0.52–0.72, P = 0.05), 0.75 (95%CI: 0.65–0.83, P < 0.0001), and 0.53 (95%CI: 0.42–0.63, P = 0.69), respectively. Eighty-eight patients were eligible for the EASL/AASLD criteria. AUROCs of Child-Pugh, MELD, and ALBI scores in predicting the in-hospital mortality were 0.59 (95%CI: 0.48–0.69, P = 0.14), 0.57 (95%CI: 0.46–0.68, P = 0.26), and 0.57 (95%CI: 0.46–0.67, P = 0.29), respectively. There was no significant difference among them.

Conclusion: Child-Pugh, MELD, and ALBI scores might be ineffective in predicting the in-hospital mortality of cirrhosis with ACLF.     

Hemodynamic Studies in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Background Patients with decompensated cirrhosis and acute liver failure have circulatory dysfunctions leading to high portal pressure and cardiac output (CO) and low systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Circulatory changes in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients have not been studied. We studied the portal, systemic, and pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with ACLF and compared them with compensated and decompensated cirrhotics. Patients and Methods Clinical features and hemodynamic profile were studied in patients with ACLF and compared with age- and sex-matched compensated and decompensated cirrhotics with portal hypertension. Results The study cohort comprised 144 patients categorized into one of three groups (ACLF, compensated cirrhosis, and decompensated cirrhosis), with 48 (33%) patients in each group. All values are given as the mean ± standard deviation, except for frequencies (%). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and SVR were lower in the ACLF than the compensated group and were similar to those of the decompensated group (MAP 90 ± 16 vs. 99 ± 15 vs. 96 ± 16 mmHg; SVR 912 ± 435 vs. 1350 ± 449 vs. 891 ± 333 dyn s/cm⁵). The mean CO of the ACLF patients was higher than that of the compensated group and similar to that of the decompensated group (CO 8.9 ± 3.5 vs. 6.1 ± 1.7 vs. 9.0 ± 3.0 l/min). The pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (PCWP) were similar in all the three groups (PVR 78 ± 48 vs. 109 ± 70 vs. 61 ± 47 dyn s/cm⁵; PCWP 8 ± 4 vs. 8 ± 4 vs. 10 ± 5 mmHg). The mean hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in the ACLF group was 15.1 ± 6.3 mmHg, which was significantly higher than that of the compensated group (11.7 ± 6.3 mmHg), but lower than that of the decompensated cirrhosis group (20.2 ± 6.0 mmHg). When patients of ACLF were categorized on the basis of their variceal size, the mean HVPG in ACLF patients with small varices was similar to that of compensated cirrhotics (13.7 ± 5.7 vs. 11.7 ± 6.3 mmHg; P = 0.146), while in the ACLF patients with large varices, the HVPG was comparable to that of the decompensated cirrhotics (18.7 ± 6.6 vs. 20.2 ± 6.0 mmHg; P = 0.442). Conclusions The systemic hemodynamics in patients with ACLF is similar to that in decompensated cirrhotics. The portal pressure in these patients is higher than that in the compensated cirrhotics, and in the subgroup with large varices, it becomes similar to that of decompensated cirrhotics.